Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Free Republic frequently breaks "Four Paragraph Rule." Hmmm...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:54 PM
Original message
Free Republic frequently breaks "Four Paragraph Rule." Hmmm...
Do they have special dispensation to do so from various sources?

I don't just mean posting an extra paragraph or two, but very often the whole article.

Is it worth searching through their site to find and report copyright violations?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. They've lost in court over copyright infringement
From some specific sites, they require just a few paragraphs, but they keep on stealing other's intellectual property if the source site is not on their list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. They also break all the rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling
not to mention civility.

I don't have the stomach to go over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think the 4-'graf rule is DU's rule,
not any kind of universal, etched-in-stone Fair Use law. I could be wrong, though. And if they're pasting whole articles and/or not linking to the sources, yeah, they're for sure doing some violating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, maybe I'll poke around if I have the time and a strong stomach
I know the Four Paragraph Rule isn't a law per-se, but I do remember hearing that it was pretty much universally accepted as being a good rule-of-thumb boundary between fair usage and theft.

Many boards and mailing lists follow The Four Paragraph Rule and cite fair usage as their rationale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fair Use: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The fair use doctrine is an aspect of United States copyright law that provides for the licit, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under certain, specifiable conditions. The term "fair use" is unique to the United States; a similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions.

Fair use makes copyrighted work available to the public as raw material without the need for permission or clearance, so long as such free usage serves the purpose of copyright law, which the U.S. Constitution defines as the promotion of "the Progress of Science and useful Arts" (I.1.8), better than the legal enforcement of claims of infringement. The doctrine hereby attempts to balance the interests of individual copyright holders with the social or cultural benefits that follow from the creation and distribution of derivative works. Insofar as this doctrine protects forms of expression that might otherwise be enjoined as copyright infringing, it has been related to First Amendment free speech protections in the U.S. Constitution.

Fair use under United States law

The legal concept of "copyright" was first ratified by Britain's Statute of Anne of 1709. As room was not made for the unauthorized reproduction of copyrighted content within this newly formulated statutory right, the courts gradually created a doctrine of "fair abridgement", which later became "fair use", that recognized the utility of such actions. The doctrine only existed in the U.S. as common law until it was incorporated into the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107 (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=17&sec=107), excerpted here:

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

More:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. On another board I go on
they allow you to put the whole article as long as you don't palagarise and claim it as your own and you cite the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've never seen any other website adhere to this other than this one.
I don't know the actual rule but I frequent many forums and this is the onlyone that I've ever heard such a thing on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC