Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I now support Bush's war 100%.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:23 PM
Original message
I now support Bush's war 100%.
Here is my logic:

- Senator Byrd was against the war.
- Senator Byrd was a member of the KKK.
- I am against the KKK.

Therefore, I am now behind Bush and his war 100%.

And I am appalled at the DUer's out there who support and defend the KKK. Not their right to assemble or free speech, but actually support the KKK in standing with Senator Byrd in his opposition to the Iraq war, and Bush's mission accomplished.



NOTE: This post is sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's the difference.
Byrd has come full circle and has completely distanced himself from his old philosophies.

Ratzinger's rhetoric, while not exactly full fledged Nazi, still has echoes of the uber-right wing Nazi sentiment in his sermons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here's another difference...
Byrd voluntarily joined the KKK as a young man. Ratzinger was forced to join the Hitler Youth. Therefore, Byrd is actually much worse than Ratzinger, because Byrd's racism was a CHOICE.

Do you really want to continue playing this stupid game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But
We don't know for sure that Pope Benedict XVI, was forced to join the Hitler Jugend, not all German youth were members, and those that didn't join still survived the war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. And it was a bad CHOICE
The Nazi's choice may have been a tougher one to make, but be certain that he did in fact make that choice.

I do believe that if W himself had been named Pope, some here would insist that we no longer criticize him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No one disagrees what Byrd did in the PAST was wrong.
It's the PRESENT we're concerned about. And it's not a stupid game. Both their pasts are relevant, but some of us are willing to forgive one and not the other based on what they're doing now.

If you don't want to participate in "this stupid game", by all means, you can hit the "ignore thread" button. That's what it's there for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good one.
And it helps highlight the useless absolutism being expressed by so many DUers here.

I'm not a huge fan of the Catholic Church, but this shit of saying that the new Pope was a Nazi is just plain ridiculous. He was a young German man during WWII -- his being in the Hitler Youth and serving as a helper for an artillery unit is not the same as him being a volunteer in the SS or a sadistic guard at Auschwitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's right. And people change.
That governor from Alabama comes to mind. What's his name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ragin_acadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. George Wallace?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes, that's who I am talking about.
Of course he didn't change until after he was shot. But I guess that's as good as it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ragin_acadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. from what i heard, his post civil rights apology was
something to the effect of "that's the way politics were conducted then"

which i can verify, i took a florida politics course, and if you look at any FL campaign posters pre 1965, all the candidates would accuse each other of supporting the "mongrelization of the white race"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC