Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The end of the Catholic Church in America?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:02 PM
Original message
The end of the Catholic Church in America?
The election of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, a former Nazi soldier, as Pope Benedict XVI raises great questions. It was well known, prior to the beginning of the Conclave, that the 11 American Cardinals were hoping to block Ratzinger's election, and their failure to do so might very well mark the beginning of a final schism between Rome and the American Catholic Church.

The new Pope, who is (if such a concept can be considered) even MORE conservative, is shrouded in controversy. Americans have been leaving the Faith in droves since the beginning of John Paul II's reign in 1978, and the election of Benedict XVI will most likely accelerate, not check, the pace of this defection.

The new Pope is even more violently opposed to birth control, homosexuality, the roles of women in the Church, and many other "hot button" issues than was his predecessor, and was also notorious for criticizing John Paul for reaching out to the other major religions of the world. Expect a retrenchment of the Church into its own little world, and away from the world stage.

Fortunately for those of us of the Faith, since Benedict XVI is 78 years old, we can expect a short reign. Maybe the Church will have a leader who will come to his senses before another Great Schism is inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd actually be happy to see a Schism.
I think we'd do fine here in the States with our own brand of Catholicism - one that more accurately reflects our cultural values. It could even bring me back to the Church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Except it wouldn't be Catholicism
It's a nice idea, but the very definition of Catholicism is grounded in the concept of the Vicar of Christ. "One holy, catholic, and apostolic church". Yes, it's a small "c" on catholic, but the basic concept remains. The only way for the faithful to affect the church would be to join it in ministry. Not sure most of us are ready and willing to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. I think we should form a
"Church of America" and make Bush the head of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Uhh...no thanks.
I'll pass on that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Schism, how quaint
There is no need for a Great Schism. The church has been falling apart for centuries. Basically since Martin Luther nailed the
theses on the door. No formal schism is required, since the church is basically irrelevant to those who don't need it. What ever you believe you can find a church to support/allow it. Why reform when you can build anew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. The "Nazi Soldier" line is stupid
The implications of being a former Hitler youth member may well be valid, but many others share that biographic detail - and have/had no problem holding high offices.

And "Nazi Soldier" is just incorrect.


Hold his policies against him - there is more than enough to criticize without resorting to low punches.

As far as I am concerned, he is Bavarian and not German.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. As far as I am concerned, he is Bavarian and not German?
Could you explain this please? I don't follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. simple: the German Catholic Church is generally very progressive
Ratzinger and his Bavarian church were the major brake block.

Bavaria is -somewhat- like Texas. It is more than just a little more conservative than the rest of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Considering that their last King was "Ludwig The Insane"
and the Official Dog of Bavaria is the Dachshund (but the Bavarians do make good cars and motorcycles).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. He served in the German Army when he was 14
manning an AA battery. He says he never fired a shot because he had a medical condition.

Some points of fact:

There is no such thing as the Nazi Army. You were either in the regular army, or the SS corps.

Membership in the Nazi party was not a requirement of conscription.

His only choice to serving in the army would have been to join the resistance, which he did not. I don't think you can hold a 14 year old to task for this decision not to evade the draft or resist his conscription.

Having said all that, has there ever been another Pope that served in the army, let alone one as evil as the German army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. John Paul II
IIRC JPII was in the polish army
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
17.  he was in neither
The Flak groups were nothing else than deployed school classes. Neither SS, nor Wehrmacht.

They drafted school classes, put them in uniform and deployed them with their teachers - these groups were the "Flakhelfer". There *was* no way around it; what do you expect from a 14-year old child in a group brainwashed youths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. So is this report wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. a NYpost article based on a sun article: what did you expect?
Not worth the bandwith it took me to open the document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Not the Sun.
Actually, it was based on an article from the Times of London, which is not a sensationalist paper like the Sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. no, the times article reads quite differently
Edited on Tue Apr-19-05 05:38 PM by Kellanved
But what does one expect from a Murdoch rag?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-1572667,00.html

On Edit: and the NYpost does use the Sun article, they just are not admitting it.

On 2nd edit: even the time article is not a good example of journalism; that it was possible in 1937 does not mean that it was possible 1941/1943. In 1937 there were still such things as civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberallyInclined Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. his reported "excuse" kinda bothers me-
"The cardinal claims he never fired a shot and that resistance would have meant death...

so- we at least we know that we don't have to worry about him being a martyr for his faith.

not exactly the stuff popes are supposed to be made of, IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Schism?
I thought they were celibate!

Anyway, I don't see why the American Cardinals would get too bent (no pun intended) out of shape about losing. Pope Adolph is 78 years old and they'll be getting (oops, also not a pun) another chance again to elect a non-Nazi Pope real soon now.
I mean, how many Nazis can still be alive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I recently saw a program
on the discovery channel or something that purported a fairly major war criminal is still alive and hiding in South America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. lol! Pope Adolf ! !
Edited on Tue Apr-19-05 12:14 PM by leftchick
but as Kellanved pointed out he was part of the Nazi Youth not a Nazi Soldier. The real crime here is his conservative agenda. Anyone know if he is Opis Dei as well? I am really leaving the church if he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Photo of Pope Adolf I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. I don't really hold it against him
Not personally. However the Church is an institution--practically the archetypal institution of all institutions. You'd think they would be able to come up with SOMEBODY who didn't have Hitler Youth on his curriculum vitae--particularly if he's also known as a rightwinger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Ya gotta kinda look at the name
Benedict (XIII?) was the one that resigned something like 3 times.
could easily be an tacit understanding that he is expecting to be a short term pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't help thinking, though, that like the 4 more years of Bush
it will be possible for this man to do a great deal of damage in a short period of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. wouldn't that be wonderfull
henry eight figured it out a long long time ago....washington cathedral could be its vatican...got my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am glad I left the Church 14 years ago
John XXIII was an aberration and when he opened a window the hardliners went to work to make sure that would never happen again

At least, in my lifetime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. A split wouldn't shock me at all.
In fact, I expect it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. Not for the traditionalists
but for the more liberal members who follow libertarian theology.

There were delusions of grandur today in that they think if they can turn the clock back to the 1950's or before society will automatically follow. That will of course not happen.

Catholic Democrats (Kerry, Kennedy, Kucinich, etc...) will come under more increasing fire in the near future.

It will be a few year change as the few progressive bishops that are left retire and are replaced with more hardliners.

Vatican II died today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC