Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Wish lists' of harsh tactics against Iraq prisoners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:31 AM
Original message
'Wish lists' of harsh tactics against Iraq prisoners
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/04/19/MNG12CB3CN1.DTL

'Wish lists' of harsh tactics against Iraq prisoners cited
2 cases of abuse followed e-mails in 2003

Josh White, Washington Post

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Washington -- Army intelligence officials in Iraq developed and circulated "wish lists" of harsh interrogation techniques they hoped to use on prisoners in August 2003, including tactics such as low-voltage electrocution and blows with phone books -- suggestions that some soldiers believed spawned abuse and illegal interrogations.

The discussions, which took place in e-mails between interrogators and Army officials in Baghdad, were used in part to develop the interrogation rules of engagement approved by Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, then commander of U. S. troops in Iraq. Two specific cases of abuse in Iraq occurred soon after.

Army investigative documents released Monday, as well as court records and files, suggest the tactics were used on two prisoners: One died during an interrogation in November 2003 while stuffed into a sleeping bag, and another was badly beaten by inexperienced interrogators using a police baton in September 2003. The documents indicate confusion over what tactics were legal in Iraq, a belief that most prisoners were not covered by Geneva Conventions protections and alleged abuse by interrogators who had tacit approval to "turn it up a notch."

In both incidents, a previously disclosed Aug. 14, 2003, e-mail from the joint task force headquarters in Baghdad to top U.S. human-intelligence gatherers in Iraq is cited as a potential catalyst.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a christian nation we are..
Jesus would be proud that we put "in God we trust" on our currency.
and look what we do in His name..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sexybomber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. This sentence really got me.
<snip>

"Today's enemy" only understands force.

</snip>

Yep, there you go, dehumanize your enemies so you have no qualms about violating their human rights. It seems that they think of the prisoners as no better than animals.

(Note that I don't support using force against animals either!)

But that's the trick. If the soldiers realize that the people they're fighting have families too, I think they would be a little more reluctant to kill/harm so many of them.

I think it was Sting or U2 who had a song back in the 80s (at the height of the Cold War) that was called "Russians Have Mothers Too". Maybe we should send copies of that song to every GI in Iraq. Either that or a letter or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. & how does the word "enemy"
apply? It has been demonstrated that many of these prisoners were just "swept up" with zero evidence that they had done anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sexybomber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well that's another part of it....
US Army System For Determining Who Is And Is Not Your Enemy

Entity is white --> entity is friendly
Entity is not white --> Go to 2.

2. Entity is wearing US combat fatigues --> entity is friendly
Entity is not wearing US combat fatigues --> entity is your enemy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC