Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UN was right, Bolton was wrong on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:28 PM
Original message
UN was right, Bolton was wrong on Iraq
In John Bolton we finally see, with absolute clarity, the arrogant, bullying, manipulative face of the Bush Administration foreign policy. Never before has one person so completely epitomized this Administration, what it’s about and exactly why it is so incredibly wrong for the country and the world. In John Bolton, we have a man who has bullied intelligence analysts, arrogantly said the UN doesn’t exist, and that the US should appeal to the UN only when it suits our interests.

Despite everything we now know about Iraq WMD, there has still been no acknowledgement by the Administration or Mr. Bolton, of the massive failure of Bush policy on the UN, international diplomacy and pre-emptive war. Bush’s unilateral US policy led to the intelligence failures, not the other way around.

As Senator Kerry stated, “We've just come off the most massive intelligence failure in our history, and we recognize that there are serious questions still outstanding about the degree to which that intelligence was manipulated or the degree to which a predetermined position to determine the outcome of that intelligence.”

Mr. Bolton has, on at least 2 occasions, engaged in questionable tactics in regards to intelligence analysts who disagreed with his conclusions. Yesterday, Carl Ford, “who ran the intelligence bureau at the time, said Bolton berated and intimidated a Mr. Westermann and then tried to have him fired”. While Secretary of State Colin L. Powell commended Westermann, Ford said that “word of the incident spread quickly through the bureau and that the analysts were "very negatively affected" and "scared" by it.” As Senator Obama stated, this question is so serious because “intimidating intelligence officers so that the facts will fit his positions, which is exactly what the debate was about with respect to the Iraqi war,''

Would it not be logical to want to avoid anyone who has been accused of intimidating analysts? Haven’t enough analysts stated that they were intimidated and pressured in the same fashion regarding the Iraq WMD?

Mr. Bolton has displayed the same disregard in his view of the UN, based on statements over the course of many years. This is the exact same disregard that was exhibited by this Administration in the run-up to the Iraq war. "There is no United Nations. If we were redoing the Security Council, I'd have one permanent member, because that's the real reflection of the distribution of power in the world."

In an astonishing statement, Mr. Bolton said the Administration did not dispute the IAEA’s claims that there was no nuclear or uranium program in Iraq. “But I don't really think that the IAEA conclusions on the absence of an ongoing Iraqi uranium enrichment program were really disputed by the administration.” He blames the press for the nuclear weapon misconception, blatantly ignoring Cheney and Rice’s references to mushroom clouds, millions of deaths and the clear statement that Saddam “had in fact reconstituted nuclear weapons.”

He also disregards the Administration statements against weapons inspections, and against the UN and those who supported international cooperation as appeasers and worse. It is clear Bolton is unwilling to admit that the preconceived notion against the UN was directly responsible for the Administration ignoring the obvious – that UN inspectors found no WMD because there were no WMD. Ignoring the obvious was clearly colored by views shared by Bolton and the Administration, that ‘There is an international community that occasionally can be led by the only real power left in the world -- that's the United States -- when it suits our interests and when we can get others to go along.’

Clearly the UN should not have "gone along" with the US on Iraq WMD and the war. Continuing weapons inspections was the right policy because CIA intelligence was not turning up any WMD. The UN was right. Mr. Bolton and the US were wrong. There is no room for a UN policy that says “The United States makes the U.N. work when it wants it to work, and that is exactly the way it should be” when it is so clear that the US was horribly wrong on the most important decision a country can ever make, the decision to go to war.

Please join Senator Kerry in opposing John Bolton’s nomination and contact Senator Chaffee today.

Email

United States Senate
141A Russell
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-2921
170 Westminster Street
Suite 1100
Providence, RI 02903
(401) 453-5294
320 Thames Street
Room 272
Newport, RI 02840
(401) 845-0700
http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp?view=plink&id=716
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tell them to not confirm Negroponte also....
....this must stop now...Bolton confirmation can be delayed by calling more witnesses to back what Carl Ford of I&R testified to yesterday, Negroponte can be stopped in the senate vote by filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That won't happen
Unfortunately. Too many Dems like Lieberman. Very frustrating. I hate Negroponte too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. John Bolton is an alien lizard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC