Tom Delay is "eager to go to the ethics comittee..."

[RBHam]

Rep Roy Blunt (R-Hemoroid) defending DeLay to Judy Woodcroft...

"They all do it" "Who actually paid for these trips" "Who's advancing this story" "I'm not here to criticize Chris Shays...BUT..."

The Rapture-seekers will pull out all the stops to defend their Christian Reconstructionist Avenging Angel...

I have to admit, Woodcroft plays her role well...

[EVDebs]

1. You mean the committee stacked with his hand-picked flunkies ?

At least the Democrats are capable of not being so transparent !

[RBHam]

2. John Fund was also on...

Interestingly, CNN featured two DEFENDERS of DeLay but no ACCUSERS - just the bland report of the allegations...

The Hammer will be pleased...

[MADem]

7. Ah, John Fund, screwer of Pillsburys

What a guy! Had a long affair with a woman, babysitted her daughter, when the daughter grew up, he started schtooping her and knocked her up. And then, Mr. Pro Life had her get .... an ABORTION!

Just the guy to have on Delay's team!

[bertha katzenengel]

3. "(R-Hemoroid)" -- what the heck is this childishness?

:eyes:

[RBHam]

4. satire?

humour?

sheet...

[Swamp Rat]

10. Let me ADD to this sophisticated and highly intellectual discussion:

:D

[bertha katzenengel]

12. Satire or humor? Maybe. Gross? Absolutely.

That's why I wrote "childishness." My humble opinion.

[RBHam]

13. Sorry...that comes from my mediawhoresonline.com days...

you should have read what i wrote about edward bennet williams!

LOL!

spank me

:spank:

wait a minute!

:evilgrin:

i like it!

[bertha katzenengel]

14. RBHam

:spank:
:spank:
:spank:
:hi:

[ewagner]

5. He may get a whitewash

from the ethics committee

sooooooo

It is vitally improtant that he be brought up on criminal charges....

[Just Me]

15. Yep. A conviction would be so juicy!!!

This corrupt political opportunist DESERVES to have his ass handed to him in a hat! :grr:

[seemslikeadream]

6. That would be great

if there was one. :shrug:

[CoffeeCat]

8. What ethics committee?

Didn't the Republicans vote in measures that neutered the Ethics Committee?

Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but the Ethics Committee is comprised of an equal number of Dems and Reps, right? The Republicans voted new ethics rules require a MAJORITY vote before any ethics investigation can begin.

So.....that means there will NEVER be any thorough Congressional ethics investigations, unless some Republican votes for it. The vote will always be tied--thus no investigation.

This is my understanding of the current situation. Someone let me know if I have this wrong.

If I'm correct--then what a joke that Delay is "eager to go to the ethics committee."

I'd be eager too, if I knew the issue was a dead duck before I even arrived!

[KoKo]

9. Yep....his eagerness is to get to his "appointees" that he assumes will

let him off the hook. The pressure is getting to him now that he knows the Bush's don't take prisoners when one of their own steps over the line. He's maybe even starting to sweat a little.

[lala_rawraw]

11. Ah, is Blunt not implicated in this as well? Earth to Judy, n/t

[GOPisEvil]

16. Of course he's eager!

He's stacked the committee with his cronies. Please...