I judge tomorrow will likely be cloudy with some rain.

[LynnTheDem]

I'm missing key aspects on predicting tomorrow's weather, and the weather experts at XYZ and PQR all believe tomorrow will be hot, dry and sunny. But in my own judgement, I think tomorrow will likely be cloudy with some rain.

So 'President' bush declares, constantly and continuously and very loudly, that tomorrow will be TIDAL WAVES AND THUNDERSTORMS AND RECORD RAINFALL AND HURRICANE GALES.

Tomorrow becomes today; it's hot and dry and sunny.

I was wrong in my judgement...but at least I said it was my JUDGEMENT and that I DIDN'T KNOW for certain and I pointed out EXPERT DISSENTING OPINIONS.

Does my being wrong "absolve" bush for his words, which go far beyond my own, and make no mention at all of the experts who disagreed or my own words admitting I wasn't sure?

Apparently so; the CIA said Iraq had NO nukes and they DIDN'T KNOW for sure about chem & bio weapons, and they pointed out all the dissenting experts' opinions...and this means bush is "absolved" from his lies of "THERE IS NO DOUBT; Iraq IS reconstituting their nukes; IRAQ HAS WMD; There can BE NO QUESTION"; we KNOW where they are".

Too bad bush didn't jump on the "Al Qaeda plan to attack US with airplanes" PDB, and any of those other 55 warnings before 911, the way he jumped on the "we don't know for sure" CIA's NIE on Iraq.