Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesse Jackson is a whore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:21 AM
Original message
Jesse Jackson is a whore
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 10:22 AM by goodboy
and is now officially an Uncle Tom. Come on, sitting down with the likes of Randall Terry? Sean Hannity?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. But let's not say bad things about Jerry Falwell! That would be wrong!
What board is this again?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. hmm? F***Falwell, I hope he rots in hell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
123. oh who pays attention to that crap? let the prissies whine!!
they do it everytime one of those dipshits gets sick or dies. it's the christian thing to do and they caint hep themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. wherever there's insanity and chaos, there's randall terry
and my heart sank when i saw jesse standing at his side. even randall was impressed, but i was depressed.

but i can't expect to agree with anyone 100% of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Nope, but you can expect them not to be outright dirty whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is there a special midlife crisis for liberal men like Nader and
Jackson that compels them to throw everything away and becomne stooges for the right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes, it's called, "I wanna be president, even though I'm a jackass"
syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Does that make Chuck D a "whore" for having a show on FOX? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. no, he's a pimp...(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Jackson not a whore, just incredibly vain.....
He just can't help sticking his nose in wherever there's a camera...and he shows incredibly bad judgment at time, i.e. Randall Terry....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. vanity is what causes some people to be whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. bizarre
It's so bizarre seeing people like Jesse Jackson and Ralph Nader go over to the dark side.

What happened to people with principles and backbone?

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. principles? backbone? they just bog you down...why do you think
pukes are in power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolo amber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
82. Nailed it
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Do you think that he might really be saying what he feels is right?
Now I am just asking this question, not advancing it as fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. In my heart of hearts...maybe, but he's still a whore IMO, there's just
some things you don't do. And he doesn't know any facts, which was easy to see from his little speech. And he hasn't even said anything about this decision being mrs. schiavo's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Okay, so he is just jumping in there without anything but a camera pointed
at him in mind? Or at least with a bit of compassion at something he sees as wrong but goes out with guns blazing and no thought to the damage he is doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Anyone who stands with Randall Terry, and hannity, and all the other
puke scumbags is a whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Didn't your original post starting this thread come from your heart?
Maybe?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. yes, but my heart is a whore too...I'm working on that, and I'm in my 2nd
day on the patch, so bear with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. Maybe you should try two patches? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. If you rub the patch, I think it releases more nicotene...(nt)
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 10:46 AM by goodboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. He is saying what HE believes as right


If he was doing it simply for publicity, he would be playing to his base of support which would be on the side of "taking the tube out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. it is NOT the liberal position to say, "take the tube out" the liberal
position is, "it is not the feds place to intervene, and it should be up to the patient and his/her guardian to decide to refuse all medical intervention." that is the liberal position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #38
52. Sorry for my choice of words

but you are right, it is the intervention.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #52
61. from a fellow clarkie...don't apologize...It's all good (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. No, no, no. Y'all don't understand
Jesse is attempting to inflitrate the religious right to subvert it from within.

Pretty soon he will be breaking bread with Ralph Reed and holding a prayer vigil outside Jerry Falwell's hospital. He'll get invited to the secret White House meetings where they discuss advancing the evangelical agenda and then we'll be in.

Shhhhhhh! Keep it quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. *whispers* "ok" maybe he'll give Gannon a call, since they're both
whores!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. You'll get no argument from me.
Trying to portray MJ as being on the same pedestal as Dr. King jr is just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
129. We're taking about a different
Jackson, not MJ.

Michael, Jesse, Jesse, Michael... 80's relicts who hald on WAY TOO LONG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guckert Donating Member (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. I love how the Right vilifies Jesse for years and now he has a legitimate
cogent argument just because he sides with the crazies???? :crazy: :crazy::crazy: :crazy::crazy: :crazy::crazy: :crazy::crazy: :crazy::puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. whores stick together...they can turn more tricks that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I hope those cameramen have raincoats on! :P (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
24. Uncle Tom?
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 10:34 AM by candle_bright
What does Reverend Jackson's race have to do with his stance on the Schiavo case?

He has worked on many progressive causes; if he feels strongly about Terri Schiavo, so be it. He's allowed to have his own opinion on the matter, and shouldn't be called an "Uncle Tom" for doing so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. I understand what you're saying, but where was Jesse Jackson
when that poor little black baby was taken off life support in texas against his parent's wishes? Do you know why he wasn't there? Because it wasn't politically viable for him...and that makes him a whore, and that also makes him an uncle tom.


By the way, the phrase "uncle tom" was invented by black people to describe other black folks who sell their own people down the river.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Still
I don't understand why you felt the need to insult him as a function of his race. If Rev. Jackson wasn't black, you would not have called him an "Uncle Tom."

Disagree with his take on the Schiavo case all you like, but bringing his race into it to insult him is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. Candle,
Did he protest the removal of life support of a 6 month old african american boy two weeks ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Not that I know of.
But what exactly are you driving at?

Why are you focused on his race in terms of his position on Terri Schiavo? That is the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. I'm not, and that is the answer...(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #53
56. Not so.
You chose to label him an "Uncle Tom."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #56
66. nope, he chose to lay down with right wing dogs, ignoring the case
of Sun, from texas...and that makes him an uncle tom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #66
79. Sure.
Maybe you've convinced yourself that are aren't insulting him because of his race, but you haven't convinced me at all.

He is a REVEREND, so his position on Schiavo shouldn't be shocking to you. I guess you'd respect him more if he shunned his own beliefs just to spite the right-wingers. Sounds that way to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #79
83. Falwell is a reverend too...but that's not what this is about...also:
The term you keep referring to was invented by african americans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #83
94. Yes, it is what this is about.
I think you've backed yourself into a corner. You can't try to conveniently disregard his status as a Reverend to suit your argument.

It doesn't matter who came up with the term "Uncle Tom." It is an insult by anyone's definition, and one only used to insult black people. And YOU are the one who used it. YOU are the one who chose to insult him based on his race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #94
99. If you can think of a reason, other than his religious beliefs, why
he's in Fl right now, you tell me.

I'm not debating the use of uncle tom, because no matter what, we'll never agree. You'll always see it as an insult to his race, instead of a description of his behavior. NOthing I can do about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #99
108. Let's see.
We could come up with all kinds of hypotheses, but what purpose would that serve? You are assuming something you cannot prove.

Once you can provide evidence of your claims, please do so. Until then, why not give him the benefit of the doubt? He takes one step you don't like and off with head, right?

Your "Uncle Tom" stuff doesn't fly, either. But of course you wont admit that you wouldn't have used that insult if he was white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #108
111. what is the equivalent
phrase to describe a white uncle tom? I'll admit it right now, if I knew what that phrase was, I'd use it.

Here's my hypothesis: The case in texas was not politically viable. NO cameras , no nutjobs, no reason to show up.


Case in FL, big news, lots of cameras, lots of nutjobs...get down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #111
115. Prove it, then.
Until you can you prove your hypothesis, don't expect me to buy into it. Clearly, you are upset with his actions regarding Schiavo, but that doesn't mean it is fair to attach unfounded accusations to him.

Keep digging on the "Uncle Tom" issue. Here's another shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #115
116. can you prove me wrong? can you give me a reason why he'd go
to florida and not to texas? As for the uncle tom issue, I don't have to defend myself regarding its usage. We disagree on whether or not it is a racial insult, and nothing will change that. I'm ok with that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #116
119. You have it backwards.
YOU made the accusation, which means the onus is on YOU to prove it.

No, you don't have to defend yourself on the "Uncle Tom" name-calling, and frankly, it's indefensible anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #119
120. and I suppose the claims you've made are my obligation to prove
as well?


I'm only asking you the same question you asked me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #120
122. What claims have I made
that I need to prove? Let me know.

You are dodging my request that you provide proof for your claims about Rev. Jackson's true motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #122
125. I'll say it once more: The fact that JJ is puking right wing talking
points in FL where all the attention is, is proof that this is a political move. If he cared about this issue, he would've been in Texas screaming about the hospital killing that baby.

In the Texas case, the action was taken in spite of the legal guardian's wishes, the baby had a consciousness, and that's that.

In the FL case, congress intervened, defied the sanctity of marriage, there's a three-ring circus outside the hospice, and lots of cameras.

He doesn't know the facts in this issue, he still claims she's being "starved to death" and he has yet to comment on the fact that according to her guardian this is her wish to withdraw medical intervention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #125
128. These are your opinions, not proof.
Rev. Jackson didn't do things the way YOU wanted, and you are lashing out at him. I choose to give him the benefit of the doubt, and you are choosing to assume the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #128
130. it's proof enough for me. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #130
132. At least you are admitting your low standards for proof. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #132
134. nope I'm admitting that we have irreconcilable differences...*(nt)_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
135. I thought the phrase
"Uncle Tom" came from Harriet Beecher Stowe, who was a white abolitionist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
27. Jesse Jackson is 1st a minister


They called ML King crazy because he opposed the Viet Nam war -- he was first a minister, his perspective was different. As we look at history, he was on the side of "right." but many called him unwise at the time.

Even though I am not in favor of the current frenzy over the case of the feeding tube, from a religious pt. of view, the pope and Jesse Jackson are thinking the same way.

I may not agree with Jesse on this particular issue but I would not call him a whore. Nor would I call the pope one.


I call him a "Drum Major For Justice" and his life experiences are far deeper than mine.

Would we call him a whore when he worked night and day to expose the Ohio vote?

Would we call him a whore when he march in Selma and with Dr. King?


I refuse to put that label on him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. You'd expect him to have better ethics. But then again, isn't Falwell
a minister too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:41 AM
Original message
snap! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Very well put
no political figure can ever be on the 'right' side all the time, but Jesse Jackson has been there more often than most...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Absolutely


He has been there, fighting for justice, all his life.

With our point of view 99% of the time.

He has a right to his opinion on this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. sorry, but that is not the same Jesse Jackson that's in florida now
this JJ is repeating Right Wing talking points, and posing for pictures with Randall Terry, and Sean Hannity.


I wonder where the JJ you're talking about is hiding.

Why didn't he protest the removal of life support of that poor black baby in texas two weeks ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. How Do You Know He Did Not Protest The Black Baby?


Since he does not own the media, they put him on when they want him to be on.There were few to no cameras for the black baby.

However, now that you bring it up, Jesse was speaking for that Black Baby. He will now be able to point out that there was a different justice for the Baby.

Maybe this time someone will listen when he compares the two cases publicly. I'm sure that he will do that when the right moment arrives.

Jesse may be a lot of things but he has been on the side of justice 99 1/2 percent of the time.

I marched with Jesse and MLK in the 60''s and I see it in a far different light. I look at the total work of the man. I will not judge Jesse. God will judge Jesse.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. I truly appreciate your response, and I understand what you're saying
we'll see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildmanj Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
34. moderator
lock this thread---the conversation has deteriorated and besides it is hurting some people's feelings---hurry hurry----and besides jesse is a whore who can smell a dollar at 10,000 miles :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. You've only JUST figured that out?
..the most dangerous place to be is between Jesse Jackson and a live microphone....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. second to Rush Limbaugh and a pharmacy...(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
37. Shockingly inappropriate terminology!
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 10:48 AM by JordanTO
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. I call 'em like I see 'em...
I assume you're referring to the phrase "uncle tom"

What race coined that phrase?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. You're half right.
I'm referring to BOTH terms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
48. pious whining, hypocritical canting
"I am not afraid of the priests. They have tried upon me all their various batteries, of pious whining, hypocritical canting, lying and slandering, without being able to give me one moment of pain."

- Thomas Jefferson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
49. Disagree
He follows his inner moral compass, not polls.

My only complaint was the way he showed up at Shivos with his entourage and media.

But he does know how to make an entrance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #49
55. how come his "moral compass" didn't lead him to texas to protect
that poor little baby who was disconnected from life support against his parent's wishes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #55
90. I agree - he should have gone to Texas to support them first
and tie it in to Shivo...but I still wouldn't call him a whore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #90
93. I'm glad we agree on something...Thanks Tav! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
51. eeeew good boy. in his religious teaching
it is wrong to kill people. at least he is consistant and opposes war and death penalty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Yes.
He's not a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. I beg to differ. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #59
65. beg all you want, he is still religious
he is still opposed to killing, and that still includes war and death penalty

what did i say in all of my post that you differ on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #65
78. I don't believe this has anything to do with religion, but election 2008
and I agree that JJ has been a voice in the darkness for many years...I can't explain why he's whoring for the right wing in FLA now, other than 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. But he's not standing outside a Planned Parenthood clinic with
the same right wing nutjobs the rest of the time.

Funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. Christians are a diverse group.
They don't always agree on every subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. But the post said in his religion killing people is wrong - then
it was said he's not a hypocrite.

So which people is it okay to kill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. Who did he say it was okay to kill? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. Is he opposed to legal abortion?
If you excuse his behavior based on his religion, then his religion ought to be consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #67
70. It is up to him to decide what his religion 'ought to be'. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #70
74. Then let's not excuse his religion for his choices, because they're
still based on HIS choices - not that he's a minister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #74
77. There's nothing to excuse.
That is the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #77
89. But this all spun off of the point that "In his religion..."
So is he acting because of HIS CHOICES or HIS RELIGION?

If one states he's doing this BECAUSE of his religion it makes him sound like a robot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #89
101. What?
There's no requirement that his actions be the result of either/or.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #89
103. yeah...falwell used his religion to villify innocent people for 911!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #70
84. that doesn't make him any less a hypocrite, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #84
91. what is his position on abortion?
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 11:14 AM by seabeyond
simple question. and once you tell me, then we can decide if he is a hypocrit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #67
75. You presuppose that he believes a foetus to be human
he may well not do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #64
69. It was ok to allow a 6 mo. old baby with a consciousness to suffocate
to death against his parents wishes...but not ok to allow a woman with no consciousness, and her legal guardian to determine her fate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. I wasn't aware that Rev. Jackson had made such a statement.
Could you provide a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #71
80. my point is, is that he didn't even acknowledge that case in texas
and that, my friend, makes him a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #80
81. No, it doesn't.
That's not a logical statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. That case ws not politically viable...that's why he was missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #85
87. That may be true, but it doesn't make your statement logical.
By your logical, his failure to speak out in each and every instance makes him a hypocrite, and that's simply not logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #87
88. why would he speak out here and not in Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #88
97. I've no actual knowledge as to why he didn't.
I would respectfully suggest that neither does anyone else, except the reverend himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #97
102. The only logical conclusion is that the family in texas didn't have
congress involved, right to life groups, randall terry, etc...for two reasons:

They are poor

They are black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. No, that's not the only logical conclusion.
There could be myriad reasons why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #104
105. i'm curious: (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JordanTO Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. Curiousity is good.
I would ask the reverend for his explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #102
110. jackson rejects poor black?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #110
112. no, it wouldn't have the same effect protesting that tragedy, because
it was not politically viable like this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #112
113. right, you got jackson figured, check his history
you point just isnt valid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #113
117. all I want to know is why he chose Schiavo, and not Sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #87
96. and it may not be true, goodboy you dont know n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #69
76. that wasnt in the news, that was done, and the only
reason anyone knew about it was because of the shiavo to do.

again,..........you imply he isnt bothered with that. how do you know. i dont know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #76
86. because, if he truly believed what he was saying in FL now, wouldn't
you think he'd have made an appearance there as well?

No cameras there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #86
98. people didnt find out about it until after......it happened
under the radar. now goodboy, i am willing to give jackson time. he is busy now doing his work. lets see if he discusses this case and law in texas as time goes on and this issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #98
100. ok, in the mean time, I'll still call RW mouthpieces what they are. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. I agree 100% with that comment. But he's thinking about '08! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #63
72. how do you know. hasnt media and repugs showed us
it really doesnt behove us to just make up a story. why in the world would you put a fact like he is doing this merely because he wants to run in 08 without any factual information, just an opinion of yours, a story you create for your entertainment

we can do better than that surely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #57
68. i dont know his position on that
maybe he doesnt see that as murder, like some people. but really i cant say if there is a consistancy or not, because i have not heard him talk about this. but i do give, that there can be hypocrisy there. i just personally do not know

so i wont assume
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #68
73. he said that this is immoral, unnecessary, appalling, etc...in other
words...'it does not matter one bit what mrs. schiavo wanted.

again, he's spewing RW talking points. At this point, I can't tell the difference between him and Randall Terry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. the least he could do is learn the facts in this case and not spew
RW talking points into the echo chamber.


Is he thinking about 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
92. A sampling of Rev. Jackson's views
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 11:15 AM by Vladimir
http://www.suntimes.com/index/jesse.html

calling him a "whore" and an "uncle tom" for one misjudgement amongst a correct stance on nearly every issue out there is quaint to say the least. If you want your political figures that pure, I would be curious to know how you managed to vote for Kerry in the election...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #92
106. Do you think Vlad, that politics doesn't play into his decision to
go to FL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #106
114. I don't care one way or the other
I am just curious at your choice of language. By all means disagree with him, be disappointed, be angry, whatever - but calling him a "whore" or an "uncle tom" cheapens those terms. I mean, I would just love to see what language you reserve for Democrats who publically support the war on terror, or vote to approve Gonzales, or disagree with you on an issue that actually matters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #114
118. You're right about one thing:
You don't want to know what I call DINOs...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
95. Goodboy, there is a saying
I goes "Don't stir shit, it only makes smell worse"

That being said, there are people who work with sewage


http://www.joe-ks.com/work.htm

Btw, the more we make a:woohoo:the more they will parade that fool in front of us ( that is if you take in the CON anyway)

Poll question: Second DU rename-the-media poll
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3373164&mesg_id=3373164
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #95
109. Gotcha...I've been known to be a shit-stirrer...I'll be gooder from now on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #109
121. Hey, I applaud your efforts and like your energy
To think I even voted for the guy back in the 88 primary, makes me go whoa. It's all okay with me, telling it like it is makes DU a place tolerable for the hardy and the weak. If someone don't know where the off button is on their P.C. that is not anybodies else's problem but their own.

Thanks for putting a shout out on the Ed Schultz show for us DUers also, that was cool :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #121
127. If only Ed had given me a little more time...we'd STILL be talking about
it. I love this place, and any chance I get, I'm gonna give the shout out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
124. MUST we use "whore"
Why must we continually use teh word "whore"...

Feminists have long fought the word "whore", yet here there are always a bunch of men throwing it around.

Why not call him a dork or a dweeb or a sellout or a jerk or whatever...but why whore?

That's the equivalent of someone saying, "That's so gay!" as a putdown.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #124
137. Whore = someone who
sells him or herself for a cheap buck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #137
138. If Jessie Jackson's "rhetoric don't fit...is it bullshit..."
Props to Gooddad for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butchcjg Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
126. Lots of people disagree...
Lots of people on BOTH sides have differing opinions about this case.

It's a tragedy, for sure.

But, I don't think that just b/c Jesse Jackson disagrees with me that all of a sudden he's some horrible immoral whore, blah blah blah.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thedevilinthedetails Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
131. You guys are just realizing that about Jessie?
You mean "Mr. Moral" Jackson? Mr "fathered how many children out of wedlock" hypocrite Jackson?

Come on, don't act so surprised!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #131
133. proof that cameras attract whores like a bug light. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
136. Doesn't anyone else think he's grandstanding down there for RW
votes for 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
139. Locking
This topic is not providing productive discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC