Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Gets Grilled at Truth & Reconciliation Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 05:00 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld Gets Grilled at Truth & Reconciliation Hearing
Rumsfeld Gets Grilled at Truth & Reconciliation Hearing
March 29, 2005 · Several years after the Bush Administration left office, criminal indictments were about to be unsealed. Named individuals had one chance: to appear before the Truth & Reconciliation Commission. By Bernard Weiner





Ummmmm.......... This was on the front page of DU. Is this accurate?? I'm not saying I dought one word of it, but I have to know, did this really happen as it is written, or is this what the writer thinks will happen in the comming years??? Can some one shed some light on this for me???? Please????

Dear God, Please let it be true. Please tell me the liers are telling the truth for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are you asking if this is real?
The first sentance where it says "Several years after the Bush Administration left office" should have tipped you off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. As far as I can tell Bush only returned to Office recently
from his Ranch to sign some stupid document about medaling in the lives of Terri and her Husband. So yes, not only do I believe the validity of everything stated in that document, but I pray it is true because it would mean that the Liars are finally being held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-05 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's confusing because there are two Bush presidents
Edited on Wed Mar-30-05 06:01 AM by Hekate
I wasn't sure what to make of it because it seemed poorly written; that is, I couldn't tell if it referred to Bush the Elder (many in the current admin also served with him) or Bush the Lesser. If it was intended to be about Bush the Lesser, the reader needed a clue up-front that this was a fictional essay so as not to confuse the father and the son.

Sigh. If it were truly so, I be :popcorn: for sure!

Hekate


edited to correct typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC