Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom DeLay doesn't want to talk about pulling the plug on his own daddy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:31 PM
Original message
Tom DeLay doesn't want to talk about pulling the plug on his own daddy
DeLay Agreed With Withholding Special Treatment for His Injured Father


http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB02JH1U6E.html

LOS ANGELES (AP) - House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who has helped lead a congressional effort to keep Terri Schiavo alive, joined members of his own family nearly 17 years ago in allowing doctors not to take extraordinary measures to extend his father's life, a newspaper reported Sunday.

DeLay had just been re-elected to his third term in Congress in 1988 when his father, Charles DeLay, was severely injured in an accident. As the elder DeLay's vital organs began failing, the family chose not to connect him to a dialysis machine or take other measures to prolong his life, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday, citing court documents, medical records and interviews with family members.

"There was no point to even really talking about it," Maxine DeLay, the congressman's 81-year-old mother, told the Times. "Tom knew, we all knew, his father wouldn't have wanted to live that way."

"Tom went along" with the family's decision, she said. snip

The congressman declined to be interviewed about his father's case, but a press aide said it was "entirely different than Terri Schiavo's."

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like the spokesman's comment. There's one law for Tom, one for Terri
and one for everybody else. That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. just like when it comes to the law for Delay....hypocrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, entirely different!
For one thing, his dad was a male.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sounds like DeLays daddy was in better shape than Mrs. Schiavo
That is the difference.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. So is Congress going to vote on whether it's "entirely different"?
I mean, it is up to Congress, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. "entirely different than Terri Schiavo's (case)"
In that the bugman couldn't make political hay from it?
Shee-it bugman, the hay you got from Terri's case soured in the barn on ya!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Geraldo mentioned it tonight
So at least it's gotten some air time. It happened and his sycophants have to live with his lying, hypocritical ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wonder why that whore didn't mention it a week ago?
I am sure he knew about it then.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. One wonders how a 'Tom DeLay' continues to slither along
in the political world. He doesn't hide his evil, he relishes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He only has to keep winning in his home district.
Not particularly hard to do in Texas - unless you're a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. entirely different? well let ME be the judge of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
46. I agree...let the public judge that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. I don't think this is the same
as Terri Schiavo's case. This article says DeLay's father's organs were failing. Schiavo's organs were NOT failing. I'm not trying to start a fight here, but this is how my father died. We never removed the feeding and hydration, though.

Choosing not to dialyse someone means not prolonging their life (at least in my father's case) by a possibly only a few weeks; it wont save someone with failed vital organs. On the other hand, with Schiavo, she wouldn't be dying anytime soon if the feeding tube was still connected from what I've read.

Now, if someone could show DeLay pulled the feeding tube, that would be another story, but it wouldn't change the fact that the condition of the vital organs is different in both cases. Anyone have info on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I call bullshit on that. People can live a long time on kidney dialysis
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 09:24 AM by NNN0LHI
I personally know people who have been on kidney dialysis for decades. And they can do kidney transplants too. Culture of life my ass.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Correct
But they can't live with failed livers, or other organs that have shut down.

Notice the plural "organs" not "organ." If it was only his kidneys, dialysis would work.

By the way, I resent you calling what I wrote "bullshit." This is my personal experience with my father's death. It is also not unique. You can't live with most of your organs failed either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. But you are only surmising that his liver failed
I resent you defending Tom DeLay. But carry on doing so if you wish. It is duly noted.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Look
The article says "organs," does it not? I have no idea which other organs these might be, but it does show that the organ failure was not restricted to his kidneys only.

It's interesting that you would characterize my posts as "defending Tom DeLay." I was simply trying to be accurate here. If you don't care, then by all means carry on distorting the issue regardless of the veracity of your arguments. It is duly noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Listen
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 09:55 AM by NNN0LHI
If you wish to keep guessing which organs of Daddy DeLay were shutting down be my guest. Don't let me stop you.

But if Tom DeLay actually wants us to know the truth he could just say so. But he don't want to talk about it. Which just opens the door for people like you to use their own active imaginations to figure out these things. So go ahead doctor. See, ya.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Okay
The article says "vital organs." It doesn't take too much guessing to narrow that down.

You are doing quite a bit of assuming of your own. You are accusing him of hypocrisy without all of the facts, the same facts you are saying I do not have. If you re-read my first post, I specifically asked if anyone knew if he had pulled the feeding tube. Do you know? I don't. If he DID this would an area to focus on, in terms of being hypocritical. That is all I intended. Otherwise, it's apples and oranges.

There is no way with over 60,000 DUers that I am the only one who has dealt with a loved one having failure of vital organs. I guess I'm the only one posting in this thread, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Oh, you don't KNOW if Daddy DeLay was on a feeding tube?
Yea, sure you don't know. He could very well have been sitting up eating a cheeseburger and fries when they pulled his plug.

:crazy:

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. That's not what I asked.
I asked if anyone knows if DeLay *PULLED* a feeding tube.

Do you know? If the answer is YES, then that's what we should focus on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I see. I am sure left his feeding tube in and pulled everything else out
They even buried him with it still in. Wouldn't want him getting hungry. Right?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. That is entirely possible.
Except your sarcastic comment about being buried with it.

I am basing my comments on first-hand experience and the info in the article you posted. Choosing not to hook someone up to dialysis is not *unplugging* anything if it was never hooked up in the first place.

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Did you read the article?
>>>His father was on a ventilator and other machines to sustain him," said DeLay spokesman Dan Allen.<<<

Obviously not. You make all these statements about what might have been without even reading the article. Hmmm.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. You're right.
I did miss that part. I'm honest enough to admit it.

If his father wasn't already in the process of dying, DeLay is a hypocrite. Failure of vital organs IS the dying process, however. Hopefully more information will be revealed and developed.

Do you know if he pulled the feeding tube? You haven't answered that, so my guess is you don't know and/or are avoiding the question.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. And failure of the BRAIN is the dying process as well.
Terri Schiavo has had her death interrupted and stretched out for 15 years, with no hope of reversal.

But the real issue is that this is a personal decision to be made based on the individual's choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
55. Yes, Delay is a hypocrite.
Regarding pulling the feeding tube, I don't think anyone is allowed to do that unless you're a physician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
64. You might correct in your assesment of Delay's father's condition
But we need a congressional investigation into the facts of the case. Only congress can determine whether Delay's father could have been saved from dying. We must err on the side of life, and need to exhume the corpse in order to be certain if pulling the plug was the correct course of action. We have to pass a law preventing other people from poisoning their fathers to death.

I have spoken with a Mensa nominated, Advanced Placement Pre-Med High School Senior who believes that Delay's father was mis-diagnosed and that a liver transplant would have allowed kidney dialysis to have saved his life. We must demand the Media and Congress look into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. "the sanctity of life" is the issue....
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 09:37 AM by cthrumatrix
life that affects him.

very odd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. "if we kept doing THIS that body would stay around longer"
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 10:09 AM by mondo joe
It is the same thing - there is no difference between the two artificial treatments.

But the issue is WHO decides who has treatment stopped - your next of kin or Tom DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. See, he's completely consistant
In each case Tom DeLay gets to decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. LOL!! Good, good point!!
Thanks for the laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
57. in both cases, mr delay would lke to make the decision, and then run off
and shirk responsibility whe someone calls
BULLSHIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. Both Cases The Outcome Was The Same
Unlike what wingnuts think, people aren't pulled out of life support for "convenience". It's done when a doctor or specialist with knowledge of the case and the injury/illness sees there's no other hope and then the family is notified. In most states you can't execute a DNR without one or several board certified doctors to sign off on this. The ultimate decision is then left up to the family.

Feeding tube, dialysis, ventilator, heart/lung machine...these are all devices that are meant to support life in one for or another (thus the classification) and i see no difference...since without them the person would suffer worse problems and die. If left in the natural state (and isn't this what many fundies hypocritically refer to)...DeLay's father would have died as would have Terri Schaivo would have anyone with a failing system that is shutting down...the major reason life support is called for in the first place.

Different, my ass...the decision is the same in both cases...do you use extraordinary means to keep a life going...even with no hope of any improvement, or do you respect the quality of life and help that person end their suffering and to do so in the most comfort avaialble. I strongly suggest to look at it from that perspective, cause that's what I based my decisions when I was in a similar circumstance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
56. Terri's organs were not failing because she was on life support
His father very well have been able to remain alive, albeit hook up to organ supporting machinery. But DeLay's family instinctively "knew" that that wasn't what his father would have "wanted," though they didn't have it in writing and there's no indication that his father discussed the matter. Yet what Michael Schiavo is doing is "different?"

:shrug:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
20. Why Delay is a hypocrite
If you read the story, the rationale given for discontinuing treatment was that "There was no chance he was ever coming back" not that his death, even with continuing "heroic measures, was imminent. That's why Delay is a hypocrite -- because Terri's not coming back either. Now Tom Not So Swift may believe in miracles (that sexy thing), but apparently not for his own father.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. That, and the fact that DeLay espouses "erring on the side of life"
in the absence of a Living Will. There was no Living Will in his father's case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. I don't think the subject is the condition of each patient...
I think it's WILL we follow the wishes of the PATIENT! I did hear the spokesman for DeLay say Mrs DeLay said she knew her husband would never want to live on life support if there was no hope of recovery. That's the same statement made by Michael Schiavo.

I changed my living will, in the last week, to state "NO RESUSCITATION"! I now believe if you never put anything in, NOBODY has to decide to pull it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
49. are you sure?
if you are taken into a hospital for a heart attack, or an impending one, do you not want to be resuscitated, even though you could have a long and productive life after a heart attack? We had this discussion over Easter dinner -- there is a difference between a DNR and a living will/end life directive. I caution everyone to be cautious with what they are doing regarding same -- think of all the possibilities, first. Mine basically says -- no life support when death in imminent or there is no hope of a meaningful recovery -- I want the paddles if I have the possibility for a full recovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vickie Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
33. What abject filth this man is!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercover Owl Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. if there is a hell...
it has a special place for DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
35. Most of these holier-than-thou people are hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
36. This was just covered on MSNBC
Norah O'Donnell reported on the delay/hypocrisy.
They showed a tram, that looked like a boat lift. He fell off the motorized tram and got pretty banged up according to one fellow.
He would have been in a vegetative state if kept alive.

I don't know the order of vital organs shutting down, but if no extra care is given, they will shut down. On Tom not wanting to talk: Different case, dad was in a coma.

Perhaps Tom was counting on his inheritance and therefore was agreeable to "cut him off".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Or, if his father died, he and his family would receive more
from their legal suit they lodged against the company than they would if he remained 'alive' in a vegetative state?

I would not ordinarily attribute such crass motives to any family but Tom Delay has proven how craven he is in so many prior actions I would believe anything is possible with him, ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I would never mention the inheritance
Except that this regime's followers do seem capable of anything. As long as there is a benefit, its all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. I believe that his monetary gain from his fathers death is relevant
..Simply because Delay's "base" that he his pandering to have accused Mr. Schiavo of "wanting to kill Terry for insurance money"...at least of course until it was shown how he turned down millions in order to carry out the last wish of his wife. Let Delay now stand up to the same scrutiny that he & his wacky "base" have forced upon Mr. Schiavo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Hell yea, its relevant n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
37. And is Terri Schiavo's dad willing to talk about pulling the plug on his
mother? Just wondering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. Neither does Newt
which we all know what he would of done. Left his first wife
while she was dying of cancer to boink his second wife and left
her as well when diagnosed with some form of M.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hinachan Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well, it IS different
I loathe DeLay, but I've got to hold my nose and be fair here....

"As the elder DeLay's vital organs began failing" - Terri's vital organs didn't fail.

"the family chose not to connect him to a dialysis machine" - She didn't have a problem with her kidneys, until her feeding tube was removed.

There's a big difference between unplugging a respirator and cutting off a feeding tube. The patient dies fairly quickly without a respirator.

Also, there's nothing said here about the patient being given morphine, as is being done with Terri. Doctors only prescribe morphine to people WHO ARE CAPABLE OF FEELING PAIN. Furthermore, the only way a doctor/nurse would know the patient is in pain is IF THE PATIENT VERBALIZES, OR ACTS AS IF HE/SHE IS IN PAIN. This, alone, is proof that Michael's claim of Terri not being able to feel or express anything is a flat-out lie. (Even if she's only grunting and writhing, she's still in pain, and still expressing it.) Morphine is a controlled substance, only given to people experiencing intense pain, so this isn't something a doctor would prescribe without good reason.

Finally, there's no one in the DeLay family who contested the claim that the patient wished to die. Everyone unanimously knew the patient's wishes, and carried them out accordingly.

So, for once in his life, DeLay is telling the truth...there is a big difference between his case and Terri's.

We should be asking ourselves a more important question: Why is it that convicted murderers get a painless death by lethal injection, while an ordinary woman who never committed a crime has to suffer the agony of dehydration (requiring morphine, folks -- NEVER forget that!). And a doctor (Kevorkian) who wishes to spare people such agony is put behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Terri's organs didn't fail? Oh that inconsequential old brain.
The difference between cutting off a respirator or feed tube is soley one of duration.

Medically, legally and (I would say) ethically they are no different.

On another point, hospice patients do get morphine AS A PRECAUTION and as a way to soothe their families moreso than the actual patients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. exactly
legally, medical intervention is medical intervention -- feeding tube or respirator, so sayeth the US Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. So if you had a love one who you knew wanted to die...
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 03:24 PM by NNN0LHI
...because they were suffering in unbearable pain and the doctors gave you one of only two choices to end that pain. One of those choices would be for the hospital to withhold food and water until they expired. And the other choice would be for you to hold a pillow over your loved ones face until they died from suffocation. Are saying that you would hold that pillow to their face?


I am real curious to see what your answer to this question is.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. Insert the sound of chirping crickets in this space n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #41
65. Could you please link to some reference
to support your claim that morphine is only given to people who can verbalize that they are in pain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
43. They didn't even wait fifteen years?
They are two separate cases, but the fact remains that Michael Schiavo is her next of kin and that he has waited fifteen years to come to a conclusion that the Delays reached apparently much quicker than that-- his loved one is not 'coming back'.

The next of kin gets to decide things in this country. And that's the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
44. But all of us who are not brain dead know
that DeLay's involvement in the Schiavo case has nothing to do with wanting to save Terri's life.

It is all about creating a diversion from his impending indictment for fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
47. Who cares if his father didn't want to live that way
Tom is a murderer and a sleazy opportunist for pulling the plug on his father. He just doesn't value life at all, and must have very little faith in both medicine and God to think that there was no hope.

Maybe you think I am being unfair to DeLay, but I am just judging him by his standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
48. Why???
Is it to painful, or, does it conflict with his current position?

News flash...Tom DeLay buys the entire stock of Flip Flop's from the Dollar General Store.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
50. DeLay should be repeatedly billy-club butt-raped until...
well, we'll know when it's time to stop :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
52. Videos - DeLay removes life support from father
Video - CNN: Delay removes life support from his father - 3/28



Video in Real Media format (1 minute)


Video - MSNBC: Delay's decision to let his father die - 3/28



Video in Real Media format (3 minutes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
53. DeLay officially SPEARHEADED, not "helped," the "congressional effort"
Edited on Mon Mar-28-05 04:39 PM by rocknation
but had to beat a hasty retreat when his speech saying that God had sent Terri to the GOP as a weapon against the liberals was released. His pulling the plug on his father was actually the icing on the cake. This is just his way of deflecting accountability (suprise, surprise).

But HOW was his situation different--in that DeLay's family all agreed that his father wouldn't want to be kept alive aritificially? Well, they didn't have it in writing, and there's no indication that DeLay's father left instructions. What, then, makes Michael Schiavo less capable of knowing his wife's wishes than the GOP is?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
58. MSNBC has been covering the hell out of this. Nothing on CNN though n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
60. Please respect Tommy's privacy!!!
It's not like he....ummm....nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC