Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Bush Stopped Paying His Social Security Taxes Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:02 PM
Original message
President Bush Stopped Paying His Social Security Taxes Today
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 02:03 PM by Cleita
Just a little interesting note I picked up on the Friday Alert from the Alliance for Retired Americans. "Today" was actually yesterday.

President Bush Stopped Paying His Social Security Taxes Today

The Social Security payroll tax is 12.4 percent of wages-paid equally by the employer and the employee (6.2 percent each). The federal government currently imposes a $90,000 "cap" on taxable salary under Social Security. So President Bush-whose annual salary is $400,000-will stop paying all his Social Security taxes on March 24, while American workers earning less than $90,000 will pay Social Security taxes all year long. Wage earners at the very top of the economic ladder pay less Social Security taxes, as a portion of their income, than workers at the bottom of the economic ladder. No other payroll tax allows workers to stop paying taxes altogether once they hit a certain earnings level. Medicare payroll taxes, for example (also part of the FICA tax) continue unabated regardless of income and without increased benefits. Find out when other Americans stop paying their taxes and calculate your own salary on our website at
http://www.retiredamericans.org/sscalc .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have been saying for years that the "cap" should be MUCH higher.
Or non-existant. The years my husband busted his ass working over time, on-call and travel hours he has maxed the cap in December. We would never notice the difference if the last few paychecks of the year were the same as all the others. We'll happily pay it up to any dollar figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I always thought maybe the first $5, 000 should be deducted
first before SS kicks in. This would give minimum wage workers a break, but definitely nothing should be capped after that. It would solve so many problems and be so much fairer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Effective and fair? What has that got to do with anything?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. One wonders just what percentage of workers must work all
year and still not reach the cap.

"Greatest" nomination--everyone should know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I know I was one of them all my life.
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 02:11 PM by Cleita
My husband used to reach his cap around September each year. The cap was a lot less back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I still am; I have a paraprofessional job and I'd have to earn 3 1/2 times
what I do now to reach the cap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveConn Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bah elected officials should be limited to the median income of the state.
Oh and remove that cap completely. =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Some have stated that removing the cap would free the employers
from having to make a contribution. If we did this and provided universal health care, something else that would lower expenses for employers who wouldn't have to provide health insurance and whose worker's compensation insurance cost could be lowered, I wonder why corporations aren't on the band wagon promoting this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. In case anyone is interested in anything else other than
Terri Schiavo.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think we should just get rid of the cap
or at least raise it up considerably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. A lot of us here don't refer to him as president.
And never will! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I really don't either.
I copied what the association had written down. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC