|
The Washington Post has a story about the real estate market almost every day. They're very sober stories quoting facts, expersts, and using logic to say something isn't quite right.
This is one of the NYT's first forays into reporting on the real estate bubble.
Their version of the story goes back and forth between saying, on the one hand, some experts are worried (Robet Shiller gets exactly one quote) and, on the other hand, they have evidence from experts and civilians (Swonk, Cullert, Mathews, Paul, 26 Harvard Business School graduates, Trump, Ross, Lareah) that you can still make a lot of money off real estate, so don't exit the market just yet
This article gives you maybe 2 reasons to think there might be a bubble and then a dozen reasons to think that a lot of people think there's still money to be made. They even plug a few websites they know, if you visit, will convince you the bubble still has room to inflate.
Obviously, the Times can't deny that there's a bubble at this point. But their game seems to be to convince people that you can still make a lot of money before it pops.
And I think the way the story ends betrays that agenda: the reporter uses the anecdotal evidence of anonymous people saying their making a lot of money even though they're complaining about house prices at a Manhattan dinner party attended by very wealthy people.
Look, wealthy people always make it out OK. Those people aren't the people after which the rest of America should be patterning their financial strategies.
|