Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does the court enforce its decisions in Terri Schiavo case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:58 AM
Original message
How does the court enforce its decisions in Terri Schiavo case
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 11:08 AM by Spinzonner
Andrew Jackson once famously said (regarding Justice Marshall):

"John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."

If Jeb Bush chooses to send in state authorities to take custody of Terri with the intent - or act - of reinserting the feeding tube, what tools do the state courts have of counteracting those actions ?

And what can Jeb counteract it with ?

Will this lead to a state Constitutional crisis and is there a role for the Federal Government to intervene in such a case and what actions are the Federal authorities to take. Would it be the administration or the Federal courts ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wolfgirl Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. IF Jeb were
to do that, I believe the President would be compelled to order the US Atty General to stop his actios; Send in the Guard or federalize the local police and order them to sustain the SCOTUS ruling.

At least I think that is how it works...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe Greer had state police in the door yesterday--
They blocked Jebbie's minions from placing Terri under protective custody--people from state social services, I believe (you know, the ones that keep losing foster children...).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. jebbie.better tread lightly
yes.jeb decided otherwise......reported on baynews 9.jeb did indeed have the feds there.............remember


Remember God is not spelled GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Jebbie's big brother would have to send in troops
because Jebbie's actions would be illegal in a lot of ways. Wouldn't THAT be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good historical reference...
I think that was a case involving the removal of Indians from their land in Georgia. Course in those days the recognized authority of the court was still in flux!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC