Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something occurs to me (non-Schiavo content)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:54 AM
Original message
Something occurs to me (non-Schiavo content)
"Now, assume you were an unscrupulous man."
'Assume. Assume.'
--Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel, The Producers


It's with all these damn oil refinery and petrochemical plant explosions. BP seems to have patented the process, but they're not the only ones to have the problem.

I know that when you have a facility that's subject to certain government regulations, as one of these plants is, getting approval to replace equipment and/or upgrade the facility takes some doing. You've got environmental impact statements, site surveys, lots and lots of paperwork. I've done it and it's no fun at all. It was also expensive.

I also know that when you're rebuilding after a disaster strikes your facility, the paperwork load is reduced. You're trying to get going again, you have a lot of people sitting idle, baby ain't getting a new pair of shoes while dad is cooking and eating his. Therefore, the government is willing to help you out by not being so nit-picky on the regulatory stuff.

Add to that the fact that when an accident happens your insurance coverage will help you rebuild, whereas if you decide that you need a more-efficient factory and decide to upgrade when nothing's really wrong with the old one you pay one hundred percent of the bill.

Okay, tinfoil time. Let's pretend, just for the sake of argument, that you run an oil refinery. There's a totally new kind of machine just coming onto the market that can get more gasoline out of your crude than your old machine can do, and it requires less energy to do it, which means each barrel of crude will make you more money. If you want to install this machine, you need to drop a million dollars on regulatory compliance and $30 million on the machine itself, but if the old machine were to blow itself up, the insurance company would pay $20 million toward the new machine and the government will basically let you do it without any filings. You also know that the old machine will blow itself up if you don't keep three critical valve packings lubricated with a very specific lubricant. Would there be an incentive there to lose your oil can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. BP = British Petroleum
maybe it was a message from Exxon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's right: "Stop sellin gas in our back yard or this is just a start."
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 02:02 AM by autorank

I got my "X" on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. BP America used to be Standard of Ohio
I assume if I went to Google I could find some Exxon refineries that have gone pop.

Besides, it makes no sense for one refiner to blow up another one's plant. You'll get caught, for one thing (insurance companies can always sniff you out because they're looking for any reason to refuse to pay) and they sell products to each other, for another. And karma's a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. mods - please lock
there's no Schiavo content in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Now there is. How could you do that? It had been 30 seconds since
I saw that name. I was, like, in electrolyte heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, you were WARNED that there wasn't!
But okay, just to make you happy...here's a fairly decent editorial from The Sampson Independent.

The U.S. Senate's meddling in the life or death issue of Terri Schiavo, the Florida woman who has been in an essentially vegetative state for 15 years, is reminiscent of its interference in the drug policy of Major League Baseball.

Though there are no doubt some who are genuinely concerned about the woman, it seems the primary reason for the intervention has to do with political grandstanding.


http://www.zwire.com/site/index.cfm?BRD=1117&dept_id=540482&newsid=14202369&PAG=461&rfi=9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm leaning toward negligence.
http://www.dailysentinel.com/hp/content/gen/ap/TX_Plant_Explosion_Glance.html
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued several citations to BP over two previous accidents at the plant in the past year.

_ Two workers died and another was seriously injured after they were flooded with superheated water in September. OSHA said employees tried to remove a valve from a high-pressure hot water line without first relieving pressure in the line.

The agency proposed a $109,500 fine, saying that BP failed to maintain equipment or provide protective gear. BP is contesting the charges, according to an OSHA spokeswoman.

_ OSHA also cited BP after a furnace pipe ruptured and released flammable vapors that started a fire in March 2004. "BP Amoco had the experience and knowledge to prevent this accident, yet allowed hazardous conditions to develop," OSHA's regional director, Charles Williams, said at the time.
<snip>

They keep just getting their hands slapped for these infractions. It was only a matter of time before something even more serious occurred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. They better be careful screwin' the insurance companies like that.
Those people don't give up tens of millions easily or without research.

The oil companies have a safer bet asking Dick Cheney to quietly fund rebuilding of the refineries using our tax dollars. (national security)

Shouldn't take more than ten minutes to talk him into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smurfygirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. but how much do they pay in premiums already?
And wouldn't this just raise them. I'm sure it's not cheap.

You might be on to something but most likely this was caused due to faulty equipment or a careless employee. Happens alot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. The BP share price dropped over 2% yesterday
so the market thinks this is bad news for them. I'd be very surprised if the insurance would cover the disruption to business they'll suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC