Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BOLTON to the U.N. Shrub's Insufferable Arrogance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 11:45 AM
Original message
BOLTON to the U.N. Shrub's Insufferable Arrogance


*******QUOTE*******

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2005/03/10/john_bolton/index.html

By Sidney Blumenthal


March 10, 2005 | In the heat of battle over the 2000 Florida vote, which would decide who would be president, a burly, mustachioed man burst into the room where the ballots for Miami-Dade County were being tabulated like John Wayne barging into a saloon for a shootout. "I'm with the Bush-Cheney team, and I'm here to stop the count," drawled John Bolton. And those ballots from Miami-Dade were not counted. Dick Cheney beamed that Bolton's job should be "anything he wants."

Now Bolton, who as undersecretary of state for arms control has wrecked all the nonproliferation diplomacy within his reach and alienated every nation he has dealt with, who openly disdains multilateral efforts and international organizations, and who has been the single most dedicated person over two decades of attempts to discredit the United Nations, has been named by President Bush as the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. "If I were redoing the Security Council today, I'd have one permanent member because that's the real reflection of the distribution of power in the world," Bolton has said. And: "There is no such thing as the United Nations." Orwell's clock of "1984" is striking 13. ....

Bolton made a play to become deputy secretary of state after the 2004 election, but was blocked by Condoleezza Rice, who understood that his prowess at bureaucratic infighting would have constantly undermined her authority. For four years, Bolton had waged a war against Colin Powell. Rice had participated enough in those underhanded campaigns to know she didn't want Bolton plotting against her from within. Cheney privately promised Bolton that if all else failed he would give him a job on his vice presidential staff, but that proved unnecessary when Bush nominated him to the U.N. post. Rice announced his appointment, symbolically demonstrating that he reports to her. But Bolton has deep support in the White House and a long history of uncontrollability, and Rice is very much a work in progress. With Bolton's appointment, the empire strikes back. ....

Bolton is often called one of the neoconservatives, but he is more their ally, implementer and agent. His roots are in the soil of Helms' Dixiecrat Republicanism, not the neocons' airy Trotskyism or Straussianism. Bolton is a specimen of the "primitives," as Harry Truman's secretary of state, Dean Acheson, called the unilateralists and McCarthyites of the early Cold War. Through his political integration into the neocon apparatus, Bolton might be properly classified a neoprimitive. ....

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. amazing
what more can one say? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. IVINS Had a Few Choice Words
Just when we thought there were no battles to fight over Shrub's appointees. Forget his entire cabinets, ESTRADA, GONZALES, NEGROPONTE.

*******QUOTE*******

http://www.creators.com/opinion_show.cfm?columnsName=miv

.... Conservative economist Jude Wanniski writes, "Does President Bush realize he is practically spitting in the faces of the global diplomatic community with his Bolton pick?" Poor Wanniski, just another guy who doesn't get the Bush sense of humor. When W's inner frat boy comes out, we get nothing but yuks. Why do you think Bolton was named under secretary of state for arms control in the first place? Because he supports arms control? Don't be silly. He opposed the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, and his version of trying to stop nuclear proliferation is truly arresting. ....

Bolton's former employer, Jesse Helms of North Carolina, said he is "the kind of man I would want to stand with me at Armageddon." With Bolton's version of "diplomacy," we can move up the date for Armageddon. Bush sure can pick 'em.

On this record, Bush is the kind of guy who would put a bunch of lobbyists for coal and timber companies in charge of the Department of the Interior. Oh, he's already done that. Then, he would put people at the Department of Labor who are toadies for big business. Oh, well. That Bush, what a card. ....

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bolton is a FREAK. He is a MUTANT.
He is an aberration of the natural progression of human development.

bush chooses surrogates to spit in the world's face, as he sits back and plays "Mr. I'm-So-Charming."

But you know what? This kind of arrogant attitude, which always ultimately leads to defeat, is just hunky-dory fine with bush's supporters. They really believe that bombs and bluster can accomplish more than diplomacy and intelligence.

Oh, how the mighty will fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Does anyone else think that Bush himself is making some of these picks?
I think his head has swollen and he's decided he can actually do some presidenting on his own. That would explain the hubris and the FU attitude of these picks, not to mention the utter idiocy of these people who've been chosen. Karen Hughes at State? WTF???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. CHEENEE Said BOLTON Could Have "Anything he wants" in 2000
and when Condo was blocking him at State, told him he would put him on his staff if nothing else worked out.

That said, agreed (Shrub presidenting). But really Shrub's core is CHEERLEADING. After the election, ho-hum, nothing to do, might as well get back on the campaign trail while the string-pullers work-away. So long as he gets these little "decisions".

P-ed me off that STEPANOPOULIS didn't ask Condo ANYTHING about BOLTON this morning. He DID run the Jon STEWERT clip about him in the "Sunday Funnies" segment. Thank Zeus there is SOME place where issues can be aired (the "funnies").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rann Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Okay Flame away but
The saying keep your friends close but enemies closer.


Better than the wolf in sheep's clothing.

Just thinking he is the hunter in the bright orange hunter suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. 2 Scenarios
1) Just reading his own quotes at him during the hearings might blow the lid off.

2) He can be so OUTLANDISH speechifying at the U.N. that he will implode or the international diplomatic corps could totally mutiny.


He sticks out totally. What a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. "The Age of Diplomacy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC