Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From the You-Reap-What-You-Sow Dept: CNN drops....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ChairOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:07 PM
Original message
From the You-Reap-What-You-Sow Dept: CNN drops....
"CNN posted steep viewer losses during the month of February, slipping 21% in primetime and 16% overall, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Fox News was the only cable news network to see gains in primetime during February and beat all other cable news outlets combined for the sixth straight month."

http://www.variety.com/VR1117918742.html

Serves em right - the goddammotherfucking fuckwipes.

In other news, the stupidification of America nears completion, as fox news completes its take over of cable "news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Also
The American people will be duped in believing CNN is losing ratings is because they are too liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. the american "people" have not apparently been duped.
hence the dropoff in cnns viewership.

there are enough rabid freaks to keep fox in business but the vast majority wont accept it. when cnn and the other so called news organizations get "it" and refind a spine and some integrity they will also find their ratings going up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Maybe you missed the simultaneous rise in Fox viewership? /eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. AOL *really* wants to promote Republicans and fake scandals
about celebreties instead of reporting the news, tho.

I hope AOL-Time Warner drops to the very bottom, because I do not expect AOL to change their beliefs about promoting their BS agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I pray for AOL/Time Warner's bankruptcy. So be it thousands...
of people loose their jobs. I don't care. It's more important that Time/Warner goes under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. I'm with you...
.. I live in Northern Virginia, six miles from AOL headquarters. Nothing would make me happier than to see some of the repuke redneck motherf@#ker neighbors of mine lose their jobs and have to put their mcMansions on the market.

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. We SO need a network devoted to
telling the truth, be it from dems or repugs. Without any agendas or political affiliations, without twisting the facts or not reporting them. Wasn't news more balanced 20, even 10 years ago? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well duh.. I used to watch CNN,
Until they turned into Faux-lite and started whoring for BushCo. I hope CNN crashes and burns, and then Ted Turner can move in and buy it for a song.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. What happens if a wealthy
neo-con or evangelical buys it? Doesn't even bear thinking about.:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. CNN - see why copying another network doesn't work?
Now get back to reporting and INVESTIGATING real news. Losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. It's much like our Democratic leadership, isn't it?
Hilarious. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Not Dean baby, not Dean!
I just heard a re-run of Randi with Dean as a guest - he's not afraid of questions and he has meaningful answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. And this Real Life Parable will probably go right over
the pointy little heads of the DLC.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey Wolfie...you sold your soul and it STILL DOESN"T MATTER!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Serves CNN right- they are a bunch of propaganda pantywastes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. Serves CNN right for trying to be "Fox Lite."
My TV screen is lucky to be alive, as on several occasions I've almost tossed a plate or bottle through it in anger over a comment by Woodruff, Novak, or Brown.
Fox's takeover is real. Everywhere I go it's on: today at the auto repair shop dimwitted customer eyes were hanging on every word from "Eydie and Brian." I work part-time at a hotel and the redneck truck drivers are always changing the channel in the lobby TV to Fox.
In fairness to Fox (too bad they aren't!), their programming flows, they have great graphics, & nice chicks (sorry but I'm a dude). And is it just me, or have they mellowed just a little lately? - at least I detect this. Colmes ate Coulter for lunch the other day, and Neil Cavuto is sounding more reasonable. I suppose when they totally destroy CNN they will go back to their nasty side again - who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinonedown Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Regardless what CNN did, Fox still rose in viewership
According to this article. What the heck happened to my (our!) country?! It makes me sick to my stomach. In the end it doesn't matter. I won't watch any of the cable news programs. They can track me watching the Discovery channel 24/7 while I get my news online, here and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Faux Moos is nothing. The local station in NY City has higher viewership
Edited on Wed Mar-02-05 10:22 PM by LynnTheDem
than Faux Moos.

And compared to the networks, the "best" of Faux Moos comes in dead last over the worst of the networks by a landslide.

Let em beat out all the cables; cable is nothing. :)

The O'Reilly Factor is the best-rated show on Fox, with about 2 million viewers a night. CBS Evening News , the least-watched broadcast network evening news show, routinely gets four or five times as big an audience, and that's seen as a ratings disaster.

Fox 's flagship news show, Special Report with Brit Hume, gets a million viewers on a good night -a few thousand more than the local newscast of New York City's WNBC.


http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indiana_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. The way i interpret this is:
Most people are tired of Big Brother-like news so they have just quit watching any news at all. The results might be misleading. Maybe fewer people now watch ANY network news shows which give a false-positive rise in the percentage of Fox viewers as opposed to other networks.

Hope that makes sense. I read between the lines too much.

I also wonder if they factor in c-span at all? I watch that more than anything else, especially Washington Journal. Lately, I've caught Ron Reagan on msnbc and I like to watch him. I tune in a few minutes every day to cnbc to see what the markets look like then I move on. That's about all I've watched for awhile news-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Those of us who are interested in NEWS, know we won't find it on CNN.
I can remember (and it wasn't that long ago) when I used to have CNN Headline News on all day while I was working. They had news from around the world, real news! Things like political campaigns and elections in European countries with brief analysis of each party's keypositions and analysis of what it meant that the polls showed this or that.

Now we know that there isn't any news outside the United States unless it's something that directly involves the U.S. So they've saved all that money they had spent on real reporters and remote locations to spend it on Info-Tainment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. FOX wins because they appeal to our baser instincts
Let's talk about Michael Jackson and politicians trading insults with each other over the airwaves instead of talking about the war, education, the environment, health care, and other serious, fundamental issues. I think the reason why they get more and more viewers is because they aren't afraid to have an opinion and stick to it unlike CNN, which whitewashes everything down to a he-said, she-said chirade in an attempt to appear neutral even if one side was running on facts while the other was running on lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, It's a Victory for Us for Faux to Win n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Wow. You don't hear that everyday... /eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC