Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re: Cooper "grilling" Gannon(limited hangout)...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:28 PM
Original message
Re: Cooper "grilling" Gannon(limited hangout)...
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 08:42 PM by RBHam
In my opinion, another game of "limited hangout"...

Why did Rove decide to allow Gannon to talk to Cooper?

Because Cooper probably agreed to play by some "rules"....

Y'know...no hooker stuff, no pressing on just WHO was Gannon's contact in the White House, nothing on the dirty tricks campaign in S. Dakota...

I don't trust ANYONE on that network since their "re-organization" after Bush stole the White House in 2000 and before 9-11. It still amazes me how quickly Isaacson bent over for the GOP and had the Neo-Con slant ready to help promote the Big Lie.

In my opinion, the "Central" News Network is THE main propaganda organ of the Military Industrial Elite, not Faux. Precisely because they have to be more subtle and crafty, it's far more effective.

"Liberal" media my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree
that was a tough interview, Cooper did very well, and Guckert came off like the lying whore that he is.

I don't think Rove really controls nearly as much as some people here think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. you are making a mistake if you think Rove has no claw.
He has been framing this election of W since W was in his 30's, i bet.

Watch Bush's Brain before you say something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sickinohio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Rove didn't give Gannon - uh - ehr - Guckert
very good answeres to AC's pre-printed questions, did he? Uh - Ehr - maybe G/G's as dumb as dumbya???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Rove is FAMOUS for his MICRO-MANAGEMENT!
FAMOUS!

If he wasn't directing EVERY move Gannon made, I'll join the priesthood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You can't have it both ways
if Rove is so fucking powerful and brilliant, then why did Guckert do SO abominably in the interview?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Because Rove is always a step ahead of everyone else..
By the time you get around to thinking like him, you are stuck with the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. well
I think it's nuts to credit Rove that much. So now Rove purposely put a gay whore in the press pool, allowed it to become public, then had Gannon do an interview where he admits he's a tool of the GOP, admits he's a prostitute, admits he's a liar, and somehow Bush is supposed to come out of this smelling like a rose? ]

Again, some people give Rove way too much credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Rove ran the Chimperor in his debates with Kerry.
Thinking people saw the Chimperor get demolished. Everyone else saw the Chimperor show how "steadfast" he is. The Chimperor won the election. (And no, I don't buy that voter fraud caused the Kerry loss.) Stupidity gave a narrow win the the Chimp--that's the Repugs ace in the hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. no
people did NOT see Bush as the winner of the debates. He won despite that.

And believe me, NOBODY could've watched that Guckert interview and think he did well. Even the freepers are finally facing the fact that he's a lying whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. vote faud caused the loss
it is important that everyone know they hacked the election. Multiple ways of doing it but in the end they contoled the GEMs and the tabulators.

It is clear Kerry won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. The same reason Bush did so HORRIBLY in the first debate.
I don't know what that reason is... but the guy is not infallible.

Probably the problem is the material poor old Rove has to work with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squeegee Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Whore?
The proper term is man-ho. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. i always preferred "he-ho"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. I agree- people make Rove out to be some kind of evil mastermind.
Edited on Sat Feb-19-05 12:23 PM by Stirk
But he's more like a clever 8 year old. Dirty tricks. All he has are dirty tricks that he's picked up from a lifetime of working in political campaigns. The tricks work because he's always willing to stoop just a little lower than people expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. George Bush's Brain
by Sander Hicks
http://sanderhicks.com/bushbrain.html

excerpt:
When the media stumbled upon a story regarding George W. Bush's 1972 cocaine possession arrest, Rove had to find a way to kill the story. He did so by destroying the messenger.

Pop culture biographer J.H. Hatfield was on hand, traveling in and out of Texas at the time, interviewing Rove and other Bush aides to research the premier Bush biography "Lone Star Rising." The book that was later titled Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President, a more critical title that reflects its turbulent publishing history. One of Hatfield's acquaintances and primary sources was longtime Bush friend and schoolmate, Clay Johnson, a longtime Dallas businessman. When Hatfield was convicted of a felony in the late 80's, it’s likely Johnson learned of it. When Hatfield approached them to research Bush, the Bush campaign already had the upper hand by knowing Hatfield’s felony record: a perfect way to discredit all stories of Bush's drug past. In October 1999, St. Martin's published Fortunate Son amidst a lot of buzz and hope of positive attention from major media. However, St. Martin's was hit with a one-two punch. First, the New York Times refused to give the book the coverage St. Martin’s was counting on. So, St. Martin's dragged Hatfield into a meeting and leaned on him to reveal the confidential Bush campaign sources that told him the cocaine story. Fearing retribution, and honoring his journalistic code, Hatfield refused. Then, St. Martin's learned that the Dallas Morning News was about to break news about Hatfield's felony record. The Bush Campaign began to publicly make legal threats against the book, and the media uproar about Hatfield's felony record killed the book, and the cocaine story.

More than 70,000 copies of Fortunate Son were withdrawan. "They're heat! Furnace fodder!" snapped the vitriolic St. Martin's Vice President Sally J. Richardson. The media focus shifted from reporting on Hatfield's Bush story to loud, loose talk about Hatfield's felony. The major media tended to sing the same chorus: "How ironic, this Hatfield character who was involved in a dirty plot to kill his boss in 1987 is trying to verify these rumors about young Bush being arrested for cocaine possession in 1972. But this story couldn't be true, of course, since Hatfield's a criminal...right?"

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. If that is the case Rove should've made better rules.
Gucky came out looking like an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are getting as bad a SlyFox
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was 10 plus minutes of pretty intense grilling
Way above my admittedly low expectations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why won't Gannon allow non-CIA newsman Olbermann a shot?
THAT I'd like to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydad Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. YES!
I have become addicted to Olbermann. He has got to be by far the best news show on TV now. Bob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Even if they are, this interview did not help GanGurk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. nothing can help the gucking gatester
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. When will Fair And Balanced OReilly "grill" him????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sickinohio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Probably when O'Reilly become FAIR and Balanced!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. I didn't think Cooper was
particularly tough on Guckert. "Escort service?" Uh, how about prostitute with genitals prominently displayed on the internet.

Considering what's already known about this guy - tax evasion, dirty tricks in South Dakota, questionable "credentials" that got him easy access into the WH press room as well as WH Christmas parties, ties to a bunch of GOP operatives, ties to the Plame story, and plenty of porn and hooker websites - I'd say Guckert got off easy.

And I'd sure like to know what Rove said or did that motivated Gannon to get his ass on tv for an obvious attempt at damage control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. People know that "escort service" is a euphemism for "sex for hire"
Anderson was merely throwing a bone to polite society.

Yes, there are legitimate escort services, but they are oh so few and oh so far between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. I Had To Re-Watch The Video Again
I have mixed reactions:

The first red flag: pre-recorded...thus it could have been edited (which I noticed happened in the first question...more to condense time).

I was pleasantly surprised when Cooper did a cross-examination on the guy's credibility right from the outset. He did let Gunkert get out his big talking point about being persecuted for speaking out...which Anderson let pass, but that was since he had other fish to fry here.

Cooper knew ALL the talking points going on here...RoveCo's and the 'libruls/blogpeople'...and had his sources and facts right there...but didn't really pounce on a bunch of Gunkert lies about him still being a "journalist"...which a major will laugh at this; those inside the GOOP hive still think THIS is the story...his being supressed from asking questions that us 'libruls' don't like.

The most telling answer Gunkert gives is his very last one...when after denying his private life and dancing around like a marionette, he says something like "I'd just like my past life not to interefere with my future". I'll bet this man's been running like that all his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. I agree
Who did he first approach to get a White House pass?

Who disclosed the timing of "Shock and Awe" to him?

Did he ever escort anyone in the White House?

How did he come to observe classified CIA documents on Valerie Plame?

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Limited Hangout - A PSYOP Strategy of Deception
Council on Foreign Relations members in the intelligence community and the media use a psychological strategy called a "limited hangout." A "limited hangout" is used by Intelligence Organization's when a clandestine operation goes bad; or, a phoney cover story blows up. When discovered the Intelligence Organization volunteers some of the truth while still managing to withhold key and damaging facts in the case.

The public is so intrigued by the new information it doesn't pursue the matter further. The new disclosures are sensational, but superficially so. Some of the lesser scoundrels are identified and publicly exposed to twist uncomfortably on network TV and in the press.

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/LtdHangout.ht...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. link does not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. here ya go....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Damn, I AM a party pooper - ain't I...
Sorry.

Just call 'em as I see 'em...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Not at all RB. You are just interested in finding the truth.
Which is always appreciated***

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Why, yes...
I'm very interested in the truth...

Here's some more...

Republican dirty tricks and smears: An ignoble history
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/9/18/204745/526
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
27. Gannon is under the total control of the WH
Don't underestimate the power that they have. This guy is not making any decisions on his own. They told him to do this interview and they told him what to say.

I agree, this is a limited hangout manuever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Exactly - and you have to ask why Rove approved Cooper to do it.
Don'tcha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our first quarter 2005 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
36. ----------Transcript-----------Link---------Here:
*******QUOTE*******

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0502/18/acd.01.html

COOPER: For the past two years, a man known as Jeff Gannon regularly showed up at the White House. He got a daily press pass and worked as a reporter. No one paid much attention to him, until a few weeks ago when he asked the president a question during a White House press conference. Since then, his past has been laid bare, he's resigned from his job, and more questions continue to be raised about how and why he got into the White House in the first place. ....

I started by asking him why he doesn't use his real name?

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

GANNON: I use a pseudonym, because my real name is very difficult to pronounce, to remember and to spell. And many people who have been talking about me on television have yet to pronounce it correctly.

COOPER: But I mean, your real name is James and you used the pseudonym Jeff.

GANNON: Yes.

COOPER: How is James so much harder than Jeff?

GANNON: No, no, I meant my last name.

COOPER: Well, your real last name is Guckert, and the pseudonym you used is Gannon.

GANNON: Yes. It's easier to pronounce, to remember and to spell.

COOPER: But when you would go into the White House to get a pass for a briefing, you would use the name James Guckert.

GANNON: Yes, because that's the name on my driver's license. ....

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-19-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. They had Cooper do it, so it appeared legit
Edited on Sat Feb-19-05 01:52 PM by ultraist
It was all choreographed. Had they put him on FOX, no one would believe the interview was legit. These people are not stupid nor do they care if Gannon looks like an idiot. They don't give a fuck about Gannon, they just want to be certain that their message gets out there: The WH had nothing to do with hiring Gannon, he was not a propaganda plant. Keep the public distracted by focusing on Gannon.

To underestimate the power of the most influential governmental administration in the world is foolish. We are talking about the UNITED STATES government.

Rove and his team set this all up. They vetted the interview AFTER they had certain parts edited out.

Besides, it's commonplace for people to agree to interviews under the condition that their people can require certain edits.

I'm not sure people realize how much stagecraft goes into most of these types of interviews and press conferences. Even campaign events are choreographed.

It comes down to whether or not you trust the WH and believe they have cut Gannon loose. Would they do that? Or would they want to maintain control and get the "right" message out there?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
40. limited hangout boot
notice the pattern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC