Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I AGREE that Anderson was unexpectedly good, but....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:08 PM
Original message
I AGREE that Anderson was unexpectedly good, but....
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 08:11 PM by senseandsensibility
why for the love of God, couldn't he call him on that "private life" B.S? Isn't it obvious that the last thing Guckert wanted was "privacy?" He engaged in all out exhibitionism on a ridiculous scale and is now trying to play the victim!

I noticed he wasn't trying the mean liberals are harassing him on the "way to church" line anymore. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Haymare22 Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. He also
...sounded like he left something 'in the past'.....Is this Redemption Song starting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cooper seemed pressed for time
There's a lot of ground to cover. Maybe he didn't want to dwell on one thing for too long...?

At any rate, he got an awful lot of questions off in those few minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because it's not his job
to argue with the interviewee. Anybody who knows anything can draw the conclusion that guckert was full of shit. Cooper didn't need to say it.

He did a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I respectfully disagree
Many professional journalists have called their interviewees on inconsistent statements, which this certainly was. It can be done professionally and not in an argumentative manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. as pointed out above
he asked a LOT of questions in a very short time. Any one answer could've sparked off a long discussion. Cooper was very professional and got the questions in.

As I said, the audience didn't need Cooper to say Guckert was lying. It was obvious. It's much more effective that way, too. If Cooper had made the claim, it would've seemed like a partisan attack.

I repeat - he did a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I agree Cooper let him get away with the invasion of privacy whining
It was good but would have been great if instead of letting Guckert go on an on about his privacy being violated, Cooper had gotten in some kind of comment at the close of interview referring to the fact that Guckert publicly posted nude pictures of himself and solicited customers for his escort services over the internet under the same name he was using for his reporting.

Keith Olbermann did a great job making that quite clear in his coverage on MSNBC tonight right after Cooper's interview aired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Priorities
The Gunkert websites and his involvement with them are, and must, be a sideshow to this issue...and to the core of how he got into that Press Room and who helped him get there.

I think by tracing his money and political connections, we'll end up back at hotmilitarygays.com or whatever the site is and this time we'll have a couple more of "Gannon's" friends with him.

Cooper went with the issue of "Gannon's" credibility and didn't waiver from that theme...and went down the checklist of major inconsitencies that have appeared since his softball interview with Leslie Blitzer.

I was surprised Cooper didn't let up on him...and hit on the journalism and political side of things. These are the important issues to us since we need reform in both. Cooper couldn't have done us a greater favor tonight.

BTW...I'm noticing now Olbermann is using the name "Gunkert" only in his reporting...when others do, the "Jeff Gannon" newsman mask will be gone and the personal side then is fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm with you. I hated when
Cooper euphemistically used the polite term "escort service" instead of calling a whore a whore. And all the dancing around the "private life" made it seem like the big bad Dems were persecuting the poor guy.

Not a bad interview, and better than we're used to, but not great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you really think
it would be better if Cooper had said "So, were you a fag whore?"

I don't, and it's silly to expect that he would've done so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No, I wouldn't have expected that at all.
But, I sure would have liked for Cooper to ask, "Mr. Gannon, you keep referring to your 'personal life' and I would agree that one's personal life should be private. But isn't it a fact that you posted nude, sexually explicit photographs of yourself on websites in which you solicited sex for money, and that some of these websites were active until very recently? How can something you obviously wanted to be public, suddenly become private?"

All I was saying in the original post was that the euphemism "escort service" was kind of tame for what we've learned about Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Exactly!
You have stated it perfectly.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icehenge Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I thought it was great
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 09:03 PM by icehenge
I think Cooper was pushing the "current" envelope.
To much pressure might backfire. Into whos face i'm
not sure. I could see the Repubs saying Cooper was
out to get him, and a bunch of other yada yada.
Better to slowly work Guckert over in my opinion.

Hopefully this is only the start of the investigation
into this man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Limited Hangout - Psy Op strategy of deception...
Council on Foreign Relations members in the intelligence community and the media use a psychological strategy called a "limited hangout." A "limited hangout" is used by Intelligence Organization's when a clandestine operation goes bad; or, a phoney cover story blows up. When discovered the Intelligence Organization volunteers some of the truth while still managing to withhold key and damaging facts in the case.

The public is so intrigued by the new information it doesn't pursue the matter further. The new disclosures are sensational, but superficially so. Some of the lesser scoundrels are identified and publicly exposed to twist uncomfortably on network TV and in the press.

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/2807/LtdHangout.ht ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Doesn't matter. People know he's NOT a victim.
You don't hang your 'business' all over the internet and then cry you have no personal privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. That was a weak point, but it's unfortunate Anderson has to be the only
one....like he has to pack it ALL into his ONE interview because the rest of the reporters who interviewed Guckert had their thumbs up their asses.

He no doubt cut out some of the interview, as well (it wasn't live).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moxygirl Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. My feeling is
that the MSM drones have to ease back into real reporting little by little so as not to risk having their heads explode. This story should come out piece by sordid piece so the repugnicans can wallow in their own self pity for awhile. Hell I want to be as sick of hearing about Gannon the man whore as I was about blue dresses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC