Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House Stages Its 'Daily Show' - Frank Rich re: Gannon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:10 AM
Original message
The White House Stages Its 'Daily Show' - Frank Rich re: Gannon
The White House Stages Its 'Daily Show'

Published: February 20, 2005

HE prayers of those hoping that real television news might take its cues from Jon Stewart were finally answered on Feb. 9, 2005. A real newsman borrowed a technique from fake news to deliver real news about fake news in prime time.

Let me explain.

On "Countdown," a nightly news hour on MSNBC, the anchor, Keith Olbermann, led off with a classic "Daily Show"-style bit: a rapid-fire montage of sharply edited video bites illustrating the apparent idiocy of those in Washington. In this case, the eight clips stretched over a year in the White House briefing room - from February 2004 to late last month - and all featured a reporter named "Jeff." In most of them, the White House press secretary, Scott McClellan, says "Go ahead, Jeff," and "Jeff" responds with a softball question intended not to elicit information but to boost President Bush and smear his political opponents. In the last clip, "Jeff" is quizzing the president himself, in his first post-inaugural press conference of Jan. 26. Referring to Harry Reid and Hillary Clinton, "Jeff" asks, "How are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"

If we did not live in a time when the news culture itself is divorced from reality, the story might end there: "Jeff," you'd assume, was a lapdog reporter from a legitimate, if right-wing, news organization like Fox, and you'd get some predictable yuks from watching a compressed video anthology of his kissing up to power. But as Mr. Olbermann explained, "Jeff Gannon," the star of the montage, was a newsman no more real than a "Senior White House Correspondent" like Stephen Colbert on "The Daily Show" and he worked for a news organization no more real than The Onion. Yet the video broadcast by Mr. Olbermann was not fake. "Jeff" was in the real White House, and he did have those exchanges with the real Mr. McClellan and the real Mr. Bush.

"Jeff Gannon's" real name is James D. Guckert. His employer was a Web site called Talon News, staffed mostly by volunteer Republican activists. Media Matters for America, the liberal press monitor that has done the most exhaustive research into the case, discovered that Talon's "news" often consists of recycled Republican National Committee and White House press releases, and its content frequently overlaps with another partisan site, GOPUSA, with which it shares its owner, a Texas delegate to the 2000 Republican convention. Nonetheless, for nearly two years the White House press office had credentialed Mr. Guckert, even though, as Dana Milbank of The Washington Post explained on Mr. Olbermann's show, he "was representing a phony media company that doesn't really have any such thing as circulation or readership."


more
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/arts/20rich.html?adxnnl=1&8hpib=&adxnnlx=1108616618-E7y/rbhtXRWZKxiJ7ZVKpA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
98geoduck Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is disgustingly hilarious! Gannon meets the press!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. The NY Freekin' Times....Vindication!!!!!
I see the light at the end of the tunnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good analysis
...of news in Bizarro World.

He noted something that may be shown to be significant -- comparing His Chimperial Majesty's scripted "townhall" meetings with the presence of adoring reporters who performed the same function within the press corps.

Given this adminstration's heavy use of PR firms -- i.e. remember when he hired one of Madison Ave's best to "sell" the American invasion of Iraq to Muslims, as if that was all they had to do to get people to forget about what was really bugging them about it -- I have some suspicions that this was an orchestrated campaign to given an appearance of his Chimperial Highness's infallibility and "unanimous support" -- and thinking the "sheep" would see it and think that was the way "everybody" felt about things, so they better stop thinking differently and get into line....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. He focuses on the REAL issue - the White House, not JG/JG
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 12:38 AM by Pirate Smile
"But it shouldn't distract from the real question - that is, the real news - of how this fake newsman might be connected to a White House propaganda machine that grows curiouser by the day. Though Mr. McClellan told Editor & Publisher magazine that he didn't know until recently that Mr. Guckert was using an alias, Bruce Bartlett, a White House veteran of the Reagan-Bush I era, wrote on the nonpartisan journalism Web site Romenesko, that "if Gannon was using an alias, the White House staff had to be involved in maintaining his cover." (Otherwise, it would be a rather amazing post-9/11 security breach.)

By my count, "Jeff Gannon" is now at least the sixth "journalist" (four of whom have been unmasked so far this year) to have been a propagandist on the payroll of either the Bush administration or a barely arms-length ally like Talon News while simultaneously appearing in print or broadcast forums that purport to be real news."

Good - He slams Blitzer's pathetic interview of JG/JG. He is totally browbeating and shaming the "real" media.

Can they be shamed into actually doing their jobs? I doubt it. Please, prove me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does the Feb 20 date mean that this will appear in the Sunday paper?
I don't know how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, look for it this upcoming Sunday n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It will need to be updated by then. I think new details are on the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you, Frank Rich!!
I love Frank - he is one hell of a watchdog too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. "The only road back to reality may be to fight fake with fake. "
Thanks to Jon Stewart!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. I love Frank rich aka "the smear merchant"
i think that what the right calls him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Guess I'll just put this here - Maureen Dowd on Gannon
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 12:55 AM by TacticalPeek
edited tipo


It's like someone has handed out the permission slips.



Bush's Barberini Faun
By MAUREEN DOWD

Published: February 17, 2005

WASHINGTON — I am very impressed with James Guckert, a k a Jeff Gannon.

How often does an enterprising young man, heralded in press reports as both a reporter and a contributor to such sites as Hotmilitarystud.com, Workingboys.net, Militaryescorts.com, MilitaryescortsM4M.com and Meetlocalmen.com, get to question the president of the United States?

Who knew that a hotmilitarystud wanting to meetlocalmen could so easily get to be face2face with the commander in chief?

It's hard to believe the White House could hit rock bottom on credibility again, but it has, in a bizarre maelstrom that plays like a dark comedy. How does it credential a man with a double life and a secret past?

"Jeff Gannon" was waved into the press room nearly every day for two years as the conservative correspondent for two political Web sites operated by a wealthy Texas Republican. Scott McClellan often called on the pseudoreporter for softball questions.

more
http://nytimes.com/2005/02/17/opinion/17dowd.html?hp



:evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Notice, they both have backrounds in drama. Just too good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ha, Ha, Goes After Leslie Blitzer's Softball So Called Interview
with Jimmy/Jeff. Good for him - Blitzer and CNN are not much better than Gannon these past several years. Talk about reporting word for word from White House press releases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC