Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three-year-old becomes youngest Mensa member

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:43 PM
Original message
Three-year-old becomes youngest Mensa member
<snip>
A three-year-old boy has become the youngest member of Mensa, it was confirmed today.

Mikhail Ali has an IQ of 137, a level of intelligence which puts him in the top 2% of the population for his age.

The toddler, of Bramley, Leeds, was accepted as a member of the high IQ society after undergoing psychological tests at the University of York.

<snip>

http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,5500,1412657,00.html?gusrc=rss

Another proud member of the intelligentsia on the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. My IQ is 136 does that mean I could be a mensa member?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sorry, you're dumber than a 3-year-old. Better luck next time (j/k :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Dont waste your time
I attended one meeting and it was a bunch of people trying to impress each other with how big their brains were. You get much better conversation here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Bingo
Mensa is just one big circle jerk for smart people with low self confidence in my opinion. I'm sure you can have a good time with certain groups, and each is different but my experience was pretty much the same thing. I went to more than one, thought the first was an anomaly. No such luck.

Not to mention that IQ tests are bogus anyway. What was Einstein's IQ again?

I had to take so many IQ tests growing up. We moved alot and every new school we got to made me take an IQ test to get in the gifted program because they didn't trust the last school's scores (probably because my IQ is over 150 -- again...this is meaningless). One school made me take a written test, didn't believe it, made me take another test, didn't believe it, then made me take a one on one test with the school psychologist. That's where I scored the highest. Each time I scored higher. I even played with the guy...One of the things was he'd show pictures and I'd have to name it. I was getting bored, so when he showed me a picture of a lobster I named it straight down from Kingdom to Species...I was lucky in that I had just studied that a couple weeks earlier.

He asked me who discovered america, and I said 'the native americans'.

'No,' he replied 'Who do we conventionally say discovered america?'.

'You mean, like, from Europe?"

"Yes."

"The Vikings."

"No...What one man do we traditionally say discovered America?"

"Oh Traditionally! That'd be Columbus."

Of course there were other sections of the test where you had to rearrange blocks and whatnot. Whatever. IQ tests are BS in my opinion. Mensa is just a waste of time and the people in it from my experience the most annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sinister Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Sounds like Cristobal Colon would have been a wrong answer
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. He asked me who discovered america, and I said 'the native americans
LOL, good answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. What the man said
There's no point to the meetings, plus I encountered some really rude folks. When my peeps at the role-playing store have more manners than you, something's really wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laundry_queen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I can't remember what the cutoff is...
But I do remember that I don't qualify and my IQ is 131. Maybe the cutoff is 135?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Cutoff for MENSA
MENSA accepts several different IQ tests in addition to its own for qualifying for admission. Since each test has a slightly different measurement scale, it all depends on the test you use to qualify. Some tests would have a cutoff of 135, but others might be a bit different. I am weak in math and knew that I would never be able to pass the standard MENSA qualifying test since it is heavy into math and logic. But at the time I joined, MENSA accepted the Miller Analogies Test with a cut off of roughly 38 (I think, but don't quote me since it has been a really long time since I did it). As with so many organizations, I've met really great people at MENSA events and total boors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Depends upon the test
The Mensa requirement is stated as a percentile.

You must place above the 98% mark per the particular test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I just heard on cspan that if your SAT scores were 1250 or over, you
can get into mensa. The guy that read the whole encyclopedia and who know has a book out a bout it... he said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Actually, yes.
I think the cutoff is somewhere around 135 or so. There are other ways to prove you're a genius, like SAT/ACT scores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red State Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Slacker! I'm quite sure I was 2 years and 364 days!
hahahaha! sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Funny
Subtract my IQ from the three year old's and you get *'s IQ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope his parents nip this Mensa business in the bud,and fast!
God,he's only three years old. Socializing skills are very important in those early years,not Mensa membership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. No offense to anyone who dug MENSA...
...but I was never so bored in my life. Normally, I LIKE boredom, but when the highlight was the "play chess in your head" contest, I had to bow out.

I may have been homeless with an IQ of 167 (they did feed me well; I have to give them that) but even the homeless have their limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. SFW???
Who gives a rats ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. I did an online IQ test and got an 80.
Yet, I am a business owner as a programmer, a democrat, and a home owner. I can beat a good majority of people at trivia and chess, and I read reference books, programming books, and math books for fun.

Something is wrong with my picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yeah, the IQ tests...
the most flagrant instruments of bullshit psychoanalysis known to humankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. They're descendants of the Benet Tests ...
... which had the original purpose of predicting the probability of success in the (19th century) French public school system. At the time, the French public school system wasn't large enough to accommodate all children for the entire course of an education. Thus, Benet composed his test to select those students most likely to learn the most.

It should be noted, therefore, that it was originally designed with a conscious social bias and predetermined context ... as well as presumed criteria for "success."

This is also why some IQ tests are still called "Stanford-Benet" tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Most interesting
I take it the social bias you are hinting at was biased against ze poor? Or am I getting cynical in my old age?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. It was a question of economics.
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 04:02 PM by TahitiNut
They French wanted their school system to yield the greatest benefit to the nation. Thus, girls scored lower than boys and poor kids scored lower than rich kids. This was NOT regarded as a weakness in the testing. It was regarded as consistent with their goals in designing it.


FWIW, I was required to do the background research into this when I was in Junior High School in the late 50's. That's when the IQ test results came back from the time when all of us were tested. My civics teacher nearly had a shit hemorrhage. (I'd apparently busted the test.) A real believer in such tests, he was immediately disappointed that I wasn't getting straight A's (I got some B's) and became quite "avuncular." One of the extra assignments I got was to research the history of IQ tests. I can sure say I wasn't very pleased - getting extra homework felt more like a punishment than a pat on the back for doing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vladimir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. Question:
What checks are we assured that the tests weren't written by complete dumbasses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeatherG. Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
45. That Doesn't Seem Right
Are you sure the results didn't really say you were in the 80th percentile of test takers? I took an intelligence test that was in a book once. It put me in the 85th percentile of test takers. For one scary moment I believed the results gave me an IQ of 85. If you are sure it doesn't matter anyways. It was probably just an unfairly slanted test. If there was more math in the test I took I wouldn't have done nearly as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Does this mean...
...we'll need two constitutional amendments to allow the little Brit genius to be our prez?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. A 3-year-old with an IQ of 137 is as smart as a 4-year-old. Big deal.
I'm very skeptical about both the significance and the relevance of this story. Such 'tests' are notoriously widely-varying for kids that age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I fail to see how he could have done that good without
knowing hardly any of the english language, or high level math :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. He'd only need to know as much as a 4-year-old.
Since a 4-year-old wouldn't know "high level math" then neither would the 3-year-old.

While scores are nomalized to portray a distribution, the term "quotient" still applies quite loosely.

Originally, such tests were only designed for school aged children. The term "Intelligence Quotient" was intended to indicate whether the child had mental skills/abilities of an older or younger 'average' child. Thus, an IQ of 125 for an 8-year-old was an inidcation that the 8-year-old had the skills/abilities of a 10-year-old, i.e. 10/8 = 1.25 or 125%. That's the original meaning of 'quotient'.

While there's been a lot of change, the loose interpretation still works as a rule of thumb, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. but, he is already has a higher IQ than half the state of mississippi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. In case you are wondering...
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 03:15 PM by Endangered Specie
I believe most IQ scores are composed so that your score is a normal score that reflects how you do against the "average" person (or the whole population).


Its nomalized so that the mean is 100 (avg score is 100) and a change in 10 is 1 standard deviation, using a normal (bell curve) distribution, which means 68% of the population scores between 90-110; 95% score between 80-120; etc...

Or course, 'normalizing' it is not a perfect process, so this in only a 'rough' estimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's One Reason I Think They're BS
According to that my IQ is in the top 1% and I'm a dumbass. If it is accurate then I weep for humanity becuase then we're really really really dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Not true, at least you know how much you don't know, unlike Republicans.n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. The first step in wisdom
is realizing you know nothing eh?

That's even scarier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. That poor kid...
His parents are going to push and nag and prod him unmercifully to "achieve his potential" until he ends up feeling like killing himself. Or them.

Been there...

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. "An intelligence tests what an intelligence tests!..or, something to ..
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 04:03 PM by coreystone
that effect.

Basically, there are approximately 200 various standardized tests which would be considered by MENSA for acceptance. The following link indicating what the minimum scores would be for various tests.

LINK: http://www.us.mensa.org/join_mensa/testscores.php3

"Tests administered by the military

Army GCT*** prior to 10/80 136
effective 10/80 N/A

Navy GCT*** prior to 10/80 68
effective 10/80 N/A


N/A These tests no longer correlate with an IQ test. Note that the acceptance date applies to the date you took the test, not the date you join Mensa. You can still join Mensa by using older scores.

* Many intelligence test scores will qualify you for Mensa, but Mensa's supervisory psychologists will have to individually appraise the documentation. Almost any test with "achievement" in the title is not acceptable to Mensa. American Mensa does not accept unsupervised testing as proof of eligibility, specifically unsupervised testing administered electronically or via Internet-based tests.

*** The only scores that Mensa can accept are the AGCT scores from the Army and the GT scores from the Navy - before the use of the ASVAB (9/80). The new military tests are vocational aptitude tests and are not suitable for Mensa admission.

-----------------------------

We must always understand that in the example of the military tests that the top 2% of the population taking the test would not necessarily correlate with the general population. I would tend to think that the curve that would be compared to other tests which would have a greater population sample with greater categories of demographics, etc. would be a better indicator. However, it should be understood that the Psychological community that dreams up these babies, really don't have much of a broad based empirical definition concerning what intelligence is, or, isn't.

I scored a 138 on the Army GCT which only requires a 136 by MENSA. The reality is that the population taking that test would tend to be skewed downward in assuming that the upper 2% was valid.

And, what does it really test anyway! It really is kind of silly!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Well, at least i can solve 3D puzzels quickly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Low IQ and happy.
I scored way up in the 140s years ago and got into all kinds of trouble because I "was so smart and so much was expected of me".

Whatta pain.

So I retook the test and scored a 98 and had all my records corrected.

Now I am happy. People just look at me and smile that knowing smile that says: "poor dumb shit!"

I smile back and go my way, and spend my time eating potato chips and watching TV.

It's so nice to be a dumb shit. Nobody bothers you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah, but is he potty trained?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. I wasn't until much later, but, I had other things, ......
"Oh, I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"


:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. As I delve into the "FOURTH DIMENSION"...
I barely understand that there has never been a perfectly "straight line" ____________________________________ .

Oh, perhaps I have traveled too far into the "space continuum"?? Oh, maybe, "Time Is On My Side" - Norman Meade (Covered by the Rolling Stones)

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ernstbass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. I bet this kid doesn't have a lick of common sense!
just kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well, he's smarter than me. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
43. I have 150, and still don't have a dime to my name. IQ is overrated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
46. Well, HE's going to have a lot of fun at the meetings
(NOT)

There's some great folks in Mensa, but the ones I met tended to be a bit self-congratulatory, not to mention conversationally deficient. And I cannot for the life of me imagine how they'll deal with a 3-year-old. Poor kid would be better off growing up around other smart little kids, not forced into contact with adults who do well on tests.

No offense to those who enjoy their membership in Mensa, but it was not my cup of tea. I think I went three times - I mean, I know I sometimes have little enough tact and diplomacy, but those people made me look like Gandhi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC