Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are Chemtrails?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:43 PM
Original message
What are Chemtrails?
Please respond in a CHemtrails for Dummies style. Plain english.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are the contrails from planes....
but some people believe they are a coordinated effort to spray the atmosphere with chemicals, either for climate control purposes or mind-control of the population. They're not quite sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop_the_War Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what they look like:
I see these alot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. They are really
the Scottish Saltire flag drawn in our skies to mock us, like the Scots do when they flip up their kilts and show off the crown jewels.

I wonder what they'd think if we drew the stars and stripes in the skies above the Scottish Highlands. The stripes would be easy. But the 50 stars? :silly:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ironically, this IS the origin of the Scottish Saltire
In 832 AD, a Pictish army under King Angus MacFergus, High King of Alba, along with a force of Scots under Eochaidh, King of Dalriada (and grandfather of Kenneth MacAlpin), was battling a Northumbrian force in Lothian for control of that region. The night before battle, Saint Andrew reportedly appeared to Angus in a vision, and on the field of battle the next day, a saltire, or x-shaped cross, similar to the one that Saint Andrew was crucified on, appeared in the sky, encouraging the Picts and Scots in their fight and causing the Northumbrians to flee the field, after their leader, Athelstan, was killed. The site of the battle was and still is known as Athelstanford, or “the ford of Athelstan”. The colours of the flag are supposed to represent the white of clouds and the azure colour of the sky.

http://www.scotshistoryonline.co.uk/saltire/saltire.html


See? Chemtrails are over 1000 years old! That's how powerful they are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. And, some believe they are spreading biological
agents, as an experiment on the population.

I recently thought of chem tails when I heard about the sickness (with symptoms of Skin crawling)now occurring in Fla, TX, and another state.

There are a lot of websites on this, including pictures some citizens have taken demonstrating that something is intentionally being sprayed from the planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Utter bullshit.
Sorry, but that's just the way I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queeg Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. File with perpetual motion
same people channeling 3000 year old spirits, seeing UFOs and seeking money for 400mpg water run cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go read bush's Cliff Notes
rotflmao!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pressure and tempature differences in air patterns
cause ripple effects in the coulds like waves on water.
Some people try to concoct fantasies that they are part of some secret technologies, but any fool who knows nature knows what a "mackeral sky" is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Frozen combustion products. The tinfoilers think they are poisonous,
mind-control drugs, or other ridiculous speculations...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. here's some resources you can check out . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistantWind88 Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. "Chemtrail sites for Whackos"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. whatever . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Whatever they are they are diminishing the amount of sunlight in the day.
They are darkening things quite a bit. But we observe chemtrails at night too up here in Green Bay, Wisconsin. It may have to do with global climate change, whatever chemtrails are they've been around since the 1990's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. They've been around as long as I can remember. n/t
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 09:16 PM by Ladyhawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. A source of inexplicably angry denouncements of any who question them.
I just don't get the anger aimed at those who wonder what they are. It's almost like a child angrily denying something they don't want to be true, with no knowledge one way or the other.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. very true ... worse than robots sometimes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. more like
a parent tired of hearing the kid old enough to know better insist every day that there's a monster in the closet after he just saw the closet was empty.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in House)
Edited on Sat Feb-12-05 05:02 PM by seemslikeadream
You must go here first and look down the page a bit.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/L?c107:./list/c107h.lst:2901
Click on this
2975 . Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in House)



Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in House)

HR 2977 IH


107th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2977
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 2, 2001
Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Space Preservation Act of 2001'.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.

Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.

SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.

The President shall--

(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the United States and remove from space any existing space-based weapons of the United States; and

(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and their components.

SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.

The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement banning space-based weapons.

SEC. 5. REPORT.

The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a report on--

(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based weapons required by section 3; and

(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the agreement described in section 4.

SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.

Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--

(1) space exploration;

(2) space research and development;

(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or

(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.

(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:

(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--

(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;

(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;

(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or

(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.

(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--

(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);

(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or

(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--

(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;

(ii) chemtrails;

(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;

(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;

(v) laser weapons systems;

(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and

(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.

and here's REP Kucinich link
http://wwws.house.gov/search97cgi/s97_cgi?action=View&VdkVgwKey=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ehouse%2Egov%2Fkucinich%2Fpress%2Fpr010726a%2Ehtm&DocOffset=1&DocsFound=1&QueryZip=%60Space+Preservation+Act+of+2001%27%2E&SourceQueryZip=&Collection=comms&Collection=members&Collection=other&Collection=coxreport&ViewTemplate=memberview%2Ehts&
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. The silliest conspiracy theory of all.
That's what they are.

You don't get much more idiotic than this, and it saddens me that people who happen to share my political point of view also believe in this stupidity. I'd rather become a right-wing Bush-hugger than believe that airplane condensation clouds (or whatever they scientifically are) are actually the government spraying -- in full view -- chemicals on everybody (including, ahem, the people within the government themselves).

"Chemtrails" are one of the worst cases of paranoia/illegit conspiratorialism/government distrust one can come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Also
imagine the number of people involved. I've seen stats that show many THOUSANDS of chemtrail flights per day. That's thousands of pilots. Thousands of people involved in creating the planes and their dispersal mechanisms. Thousands of people involved in maintaining (and evidently hiding) the planes when on the ground, thousands needed to create the chemicals and transport them to the planes and load them.

Many scientists, climatologists, ecologists, psychiatrists (depending on what the purpose of the chemtrails are) to create, monitor and evaluate the results.

We're to believe thousands and thousands of people are involved in this conspiracy, yet manage to keep it ultra-secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steven Flow Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good links for info...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Here you are. From a site about weather war...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. eeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
it's CLOUDS!! run for your lives! ! water condensation!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. try this site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. These days, with the creeps in charge now, who knows? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. The real answer is....
Chemtrails are really the breeding grounds of RODS



http://www.roswellrods.com/pre.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. “Prevention of Outer Space Arms Race"
Towards the end of 2000, the United Nations General Assembly had a vote on a resolution called the “Prevention of Outer Space Arms Race.” It was adopted by a recorded vote of 163 in favor to none against, with 3 abstentions. The three that abstained were the Federated States of Micronesia, Israel and the United States of America. (You can see the details from a U.N. press release, together with a list of countries that voted, were absent and so on.)

The United Nations recently reiterated concerns about the militarization of space and not being used for peaceful purposes in a U.N. General Assembly session:

The view was expressed that the Committee had not been fulfilling the mandate given to it by the General Assembly in recommending ways and means of maintaining outer space for peaceful purposes. That delegation expressed the view that the Committee should address itself to that issue, since military activities in outer space were seriously affecting international cooperation in the exploration and peaceful uses of outer space.

...

Some delegations expressed the view that a greater risk of the introduction of weapons into outer space and the adoption of a concept of a use of force in outer space would undermine the basis for and the very logic of developing nonproliferation mechanisms and of the whole system of international security.

... The view was expressed that an international agreement should be concluded to prohibit the deployment of weapons in outer space.


http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2000/20001120.ga9829.doc.html


Most leaders of the world are on record wanting to ban space-based weapons. On April 12, 2001, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan announced his support of a ban on space-based weapons. The Secretary General stated that the international community recognized early that a legal regime for outer space was needed to prevent space from becoming another arena of military confrontation. On November 29, 2001, the U.N. General Assembly approved by a 156-0 vote the basis for a treaty establishing a permanent ban on space-based weapons (Resolution 56/535), by stating the Member Nations were "convinced that further measures should be examined in the search for effective and verifiable bilateral and multilateral agreements in order to prevent an arms race in outer space, including the weaponization of outer space." On November 20, 2000, a similar U.N. General Assembly resolution to prevent an arms race in space (Resolution 55/32) was approved where the final adopting vote was 163-0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DARE to HOPE Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Wish it weren't so, but it is...
Meigs Field is closed, the air field Jesse Jr wants to build in the cornfields is not yet, the Gary Airport is busy, but not like this, and O'Hare is too far north. These are NOT commercial planes.

Our daily walks in the set aside Forest Preserve are absolutely RUINED by these flights! Right over the deer, all the wetlands behind the Priory, teaming with frogs, even heron, as well as ducks, geese, all sorts of wonders--WAY HIGH UP, back and forth, back and forth, like a woven pot holder in the sky, enveloped with only God knows what as we breathe deeply of the (health building) air.

And now this Morgellon skin disease, reported in Florida, California and Texas, may be connected with polymers floating down upon our heads. Hey, we know they are knowingly poisoning our own young soldiers in Iraq with DU. WHY NOT the rest of us? (See Bush history with Eugenics movement.)

And there it is, right in the Congressional Record, in addition to all the scientists all over this country measuring, decifering the vile chemicals being thrown on our very own population!!

God save us from these madmen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. In the Congressional Record?
If somebody introduces a bill outlawing the shooting of unicorns, is that proof unicorns exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. A government program designed to distract us from
the mind control machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC