Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it time to SEPARATE usa into 2 COUNTRIES,blue half and red half?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mirror Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:50 AM
Original message
Is it time to SEPARATE usa into 2 COUNTRIES,blue half and red half?
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 07:52 AM by mirror
This is a very difficult choice for america i understand that,but if it were to happen it would surely bring freedom and democracy back to america.Also the new formed blue country would be less likely and to smart to start wars and red country to poor to start wars. anybody agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. No
because the country isn't really that divided. There are sizable numbers of liberals in 'red' states, and the percentage by which Bush won many of his states was small. An article on another thread here said that there were only 21 states solidly in the Bush camp this last election, far fewer than there were for Reagan or BushI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. No. This is not a new suggestion here.
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 08:00 AM by Bridget Burke
Look at some REAL maps from Election 2004 & don't buy into the divisive propaganda:

www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2004/

Where would you draw the border?

Edited to add: Your profile says "ENGLAND"--why don't you draw some more borders through your remaining Empire rather than making suggestions for the USA?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nice map, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ouch! That's harsh!
Only Americans may offer comments and suggestions regarding America?

That is so not like you, Bridget! Now who's put you into a bad mood this AM and I'll go kick him/it in the balls. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes, a bit harsh.
I just get tired of these "divide the country" suggestions.

Partition rarely solves problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Can we do what Mann Coulter keeps calling for???
Round up and jail all rethugs? :D

(S/he calls for libruls to be killed, but otherwise it's the same plan) :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. No, prisons are bad enough as they are....
Of course, we could make room for them by releasing the pot smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Works for me.
I don't smoke pot myself, but I don't see why those who do are in prison...and there are so many more deserving. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. And how about putting drug addicts in treatment programs and not prisons
Seems sensible to me. But oh wait! Then people couldn't profit off of the prison industrial complex. Silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Or EVEN leaving drugs users alone to choose for themselves
Maybe we smoke cannabis cuz we like it, and are not causing any
problems whatsoever by chillin' with some grass, good music, fine
company and a good meal.

Sounds like the addicts are those who keep tryin' ta fix what ain't
broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Well yea I like yer plan better...
Marajuana should be legalized. I don't really see the Harm in decriminalizing other illegal drugs (considering that you can get the same crap with a perscription) but I don't think that it should be legally sold in stores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorbal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. peopel are already building a country within our country
http://alterinfra.blogspot.com/

People are already hard at work at quiet subversion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. My precinct in my red state
went blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, the time to do this
was in that period from 1861 to 1865 when the British empire did in fact come to the aid of the Confederacy in trying to make sure no one huge country formed on the middle of the North American continent.

It is too bad the effort didn't succeed. I would now live in a very backward and benighted country called the CSA, but it would be so poor that it would barely be able to defend its own borders, much less project imperial power of its own.

In exchange for the eradication of slavery and states' rights, we all now must live 140 years later with perpetual war abroad and a police state at home, followed perhaps by nuclear annihilation and extinctino.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdot Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. not unless...
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 08:12 AM by bdot
Not unless you make NC a neutral state. I don't want my state stuck in either catagory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'd rather have two countries and let people emigrate between them
I have nothing against the actual citizens of the fly-over states.

I just object to their locally elected officials ruining the rest of the country.

If we had an America and a Jesusland, people would be free to live in whichever country suits them.

Or maybe we need a third house of congress elected as a kind of Parliament?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. All I know is
I'm so happy I live in a decidedly blue state after twenty years in a red one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Er...
Hasn't that been tried before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes.
It didn't work out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. We can all read about General Delay's
March to the Sea and how he made Berkeley Howl.

No thanks.

In 1860 it was unknown whether secession was legal or not. Now it's been settled. It's illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. It would be good for the Blue States and the rest of the world.
Not so hot for the backward red states and the inmates thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. they can emigrate
and I'm sure there would be some blue state residents moving as well

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. One BIG problem with that
Thanks to Mann Coulter and Flush Limpdick that would be an open invitation for the red state country to come after us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. No. Didn't a lot of red states go for Clinton
It seems to be that Clinton won what is now called the "red states". So don't give up hope on that part of the country.

It seems to be that this red state/blue state thing is just a Bush ploy to divide the country. Divide and conquer is the only way the Bush administration can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. The entire country except Minnesota and DC was red in 1984
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 09:57 PM by Hippo_Tron
These things do change. Although apparently the idea of red states and blue states is a phenomenon that started after the 2000 election when CNN just started labeling them those colors. I'm not sure that I agree with that analysis because certain regions of the country have voted together in many elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. This whole red state and blue state seccession thing is a bunch of crap
Even the states are divided:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
26. I wish it were that simple
I would love to split from the brainwashed republican peeps, but we really need to try to fix this BushCo problem if at all possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm sure the tories have a similar idea
Edited on Fri Feb-04-05 02:17 AM by sweetheart
Have you looked at a british electoral map? If the same was done in
britain, all the cities would be "labour" and all the open land of the
most of england would be tory land.

That said, i can see your thinking in terms of how britain has devoled
wales, and scotland, effectively allowing significant devolution of
education and minor powers... perhaps you're thinking more of how
ireland was once part of the british empire... and broke off without
violence. :eyes:

mirror mirror... oh dear. You have all the diplomatic skills of a bush
republican.... might you be a bit more thoughtful please, rather than
stirring up trouble with ignorance.

I have 2 book recommendations for you, so you are better equipped to
start threads across the atlantic without coming across like an ass.

will hutton: "the world we're in"
Chalmers Johnson: "The sorrows of empire"

Anyone else at DU have any book recommendations for mirror?

The only way to fix what is going on in the USA, is for the entire
system to crash. Empires do not renew without crashing. History
teaches us, and despite my private wish that a pheonix might rise
out of this morass, the danger is too great. The world is threatened
and in peril from a deeply militarist imperial culture bent on global
domination, and the only way is to cut it off by dumping the dollar.

This is the least damaging way to cut back on the problem, as the
spending power for foreign wars and influence will cut back, and with
that humility will be gained, with every downward tick of the buck.
The only other alternative is a world war, and an armed overthrow
of the GOP-nazis... something that will cost 100 million lives at the
very least and, at the end of it, leave all the countries who were
not involved in the war, the victors, much as how world war 2
destroyed the empires of europe, leaving the US the only western
nation standing. This next war could leave australia, malaysia and
chile as our new world leaders.... to be avoided.... dump the dollar.

You might think, "pot meet kettle, sweetheart" as i write
transatlantic as well, however, i voted in this last poll, and
retain my franchise, along with the 1040 form sitting on my desk
to pay the fikking bills for this bankrupt mess. Until i don't get
any more of those forms in the mail, i'll complain loudly about the
rotten government example being set in washington, and as britain
really is, as you know, a tail, being wagged by the dog in washington,
it is the least i can do for my british friends to complain, as
they've less franchise, and draw the poison you've drawn in this
thread with people complaining that you should mind your own
business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MI Cherie Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-05 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
30. Which half?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC