Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rabbi May Have Given Babies Herpes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bark Bark Bark Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:18 AM
Original message
Rabbi May Have Given Babies Herpes
Oh, this is SO sad and SO nasty.

http://my.netscape.com/corewidgets/news/story.psp?cat=50200&id=2005020205390001863233

NEW YORK (AP) - City health officials are investigating the death of a baby boy who was one of three infants to contract herpes after a rabbi circumcised them.

Ten days after Rabbi Yitzhok Fischer performed religious circumcisions on twins last October, one died of herpes and the other tested positive for the virus, according to complaint filed by the health department in Manhattan Supreme Court.

The complaint, reported in Wednesday's edition of the New York Daily News, also said health officials later found a third baby who had contracted herpes after being circumcised by Fischer in late 2003.

Under Jewish law, a mohel - someone who performs circumcisions - draws blood from the circumcision wound. Most mohels do it by hand, but Fischer uses a rare practice where he uses his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. ahgggggggggggggggggg!
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 07:21 AM by thebigidea
"Most mohels do it by hand, but Fischer uses a rare practice where he uses his mouth."

that's an image I did not need planted in my brain before breakfast.

Hell, I didn't even know there was a rare circumcision practice using your teeth... surely borscht belt comedians could've made a living telling jokes about it. Where's Eddie Cantor when you need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. That is so perverted....
How could any parent tolerate that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DalvaThree Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't know herpes was ever fatal
I know it's not fatal in adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LosinIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Herpes can be fatal to newborns,
that's why mothers w/herpes need to be monitored as delivery time nears. If they have a lesion at the time of delivery, then they deliver via caesarean section to eliminate the risk of the baby contracting the infection from the birth canal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Abuse
all circumcision, whether male or female, is abuse, religious mumbo jumbo included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sick....
I'm glad my parents used a physician...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. What they hell do they mean by rare practice? Sick and perverted is
more like it. Don't ever tell me that there's a valid religious reason for this one because I'm not that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I Never Heard Of That...
Somebody made that shit up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Trust me, no one is making it up.
I've read about this on occasion when reading about the many different ways circumcision is done. I haven't bothered to search google for a link. Go ahead and try on your own if you care, but yes, that's something some rabbis do. Makes you wonder a lot about the rabbis who do.

Makes you wonder even more about religious mumbo-jumbo and the unwillingness of religious believers to use the brain god gave them to think rationally, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Don't Know...
I just know my parents used a physician...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's NOT made up. Unfortunately, it's real (link provided):
"Metzitzeh: (Mezzizza/Mizizah) The sucking of blood from the wound
During the Talmudic period (500-625 A.D.), a third step was added to the Orthodox circumcision ritual. It was not universally adopted by all Jewish groups, but became a practice of the more Orthodox groups. This third step was called "Metzitzah". During "Metzitzah", the mohel takes the now badly bleeding penis into his mouth and sucks the blood from the wounded pant. This was most probably adopted to collapse the major blood vessels to stem bleeding and to extract any induced bacteria from the wound and blood system. In effect, it often introduced infection, such as tuberculosis and venereal diseases, with very serious and tragic consequence, as reported throughout history. More modern day mohels use a glass tube placed over the infant's penis for suction of the blood when performing metzitzah. In many Jewish ritual circumcisions this step of Metzitzah has been eliminated."

http://www.cirp.org/library/history/peron2/


Isn't the Internet wonderful? You can learn all sorts of things you never wanted to know...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I Don't Know...
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 08:00 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
I come from a secular Jewish family...


I'm glad it was a doctor and not a rabbi who performed the circumcision...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Now, THAT is just fucked up in too many ways
I always love to start my day with a hearty :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke::puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: . I am now more convinced than ever that humans are historically loathsome and that God hates us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Effing sick
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The article spelled his name wrong: Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 07:46 AM by IanDB1
And his webpage crashed my Mozilla browser.

Bris-Milah.com - Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer
... For further details please call Rabbi Y. Aaron Fischer CERTIFIED MOHEL. Telephone
1(800) FOR-BRIS

----

I think I know a relative of this guy. If so, it would explain a lot.

Pictured below:
A Rabbi performs a circumcision on an extra-terrestrial at Area 51:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Are you guys against plastic surgery also?
I guess you can try the argument that if an adult chooses to have plastic surgery done then it is ok although I do not see the difference. What about a child born with a mild birth defect? No sugery to correct?

I think this goes along similar lines as a right to choose. It is not your right. That being said you are entitled to your opinion and fortunately we are still in a semi-free country and you can choose not to have it done to your children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bark Bark Bark Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Hang On There Sparky
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 08:00 AM by Bark Bark Bark
Read the posts. No one's bashing circumcision, although it's a debatable procedure. What's grossing us all out is the method. And I didn't even have the details on THAT; MercutioATC confirmed my worst fears.

Edit: Okay, yeah, SweetLeftFoot knocked circumcision. But what makes this so unbelievable is the use of the mouth on an infant's genitals AND an infant's surgical wound. Astonishing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SouthernDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. No problem skippy :)
Ok, I agree the mouth thing is disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Huh?
:crazy:

Quick... call a cop...;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. A concern I have with your reasoning is that
it is not the person being circumcised that is making the choice.

When I was pregnant I decided not to have it done for my child, if my child was male - mainly because of the medical reasons against it (body parts are generally put there for a reason), and because of the experiences of some of my male circumcised friends who resented the fact that the choice was made for them by their parents.

Although the surgery is not terribly pleasant, it is possible to delay the decision into adulthood and to permit the person whose body it is to make the decision (my grandfather was circumcised in his 60s).

That said, I wouldn't put deciding for your child whether he should be circumcised in either extreme category of classifying it (1) as correcting a birth defect (the foreskin is not a birth defect) or (2) as child abuse (it is relatively minor surgery, and there are valid cultural reasons to have it done (looking like father, or religion being the two most common ones)). It is more like plastic surgery - a decision we generally do not permit one person to make for another, which brings me back to a concern I have with your reasoning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danmel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. My son was circumcised by a Mohel
Edited on Wed Feb-02-05 08:17 AM by Danmel
And he most definitely did NOT suck the blood. Ewww. That is just wrong and it is NOT mainstream Jewish custom. Those poor kids. I can't imagine what the Mohel was thinking, I really can't.

It sort of surprises me that that would be a Jewish custom anyway, considering that eating blood is prohinited under Kosher laws. You have to soak and salt meat to draw out the blood, you can't eat an egg if it has any blood in it, liver has to be broiled to eliminate blood. Personally (and I am not particularly observant and there is a lot I don't know), it strikes me as a fringe kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I'm Glad A Doctor Did Mine
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. They were talking about this on Imus.
Sid bashed the Pope a little, and then the bald guy talked about this. I didn't imagine it was true at the time. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC