|
>>Look at Dan Rather who was finally fired...or quit, yeah whatever, >> Rather is another liar, Rather would lie so much it would give an >> aspirin a headache. > > Ah yes, the infamous Rather-gate, because CBS couldn't verify some > documents that didn't really add much to the fact that Bush skipped > National Guard duty during wartime.
Would be interesting, if true. But we all know Bush earned all the hours and exceeded his obligation, he skipped nothing but was exceptional.
In fact the mainstream liberal media MLM, failed to make widely known the fact that Bush tried at least 2 or more times to fly missions in Vietnam, he volunteered for combat operations!
Its so amazing how Bill Clinton was literally an admitted draft dodger, went to England and defamed, insulted and spat on the name of the US military, later to become commander in chief of that same US military??
Then we had Sen Kerry who admits to being a war criminal and lies about the US militarys role in Vietnam, and spat on the military and brave, decorated soldiers, Kerry bragged for decades how he threw away his medals, but you democrats praise him also?
But you have actual, real, honorable soldiers like President Bush and you find it correct to insult and lie about his record? You defend Dan Rather, proven to be a liar in such things as his 1988 Vietnam documentary? Many "soldiers" he interviewed turned out to be liars, never doing things they claimed, they described events of war crimes that never took place? Now the DNC launches a campaign against Bush, and supposed documents appear from about 1970 that have the 66 and 99 quote marks which typewriters didnt use, nor did they use proportional spacing, but the documents, typed on Microsoft Word and held up to the light? were an exact match. Since I did typing in the 1970s its obvious to me also
Since democrats want power, and have no leadership and no morals? All they can do is use Hollywood to invent trouble and throw mud and allege and smear the names of honorable people. How much better America would be without all the wasted time, frivilous lawsuits, ruined characters and blocked legislation by democrats.
You probably think Joe McCarthy 1950s/60s was a bad person? Or that Nixon was a bad president? No, they were both very honorable men who served the USA well, but were targets of massive, $billions of dollars of character assasination effort by democrats and *, writing up slander into books, encyclopedias, documentaries, all hoping that YOU wont check what actually happened
------
The top was what he wrote, I then replied & then he gave me the full svada. I'm quite frankly speechless - is this guy serious or what?
|