Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC. This is hate speech.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:48 AM
Original message
MSNBC. This is hate speech.
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 04:09 AM by bullimiami
Scarborough Country. Buchanan, Bill Donahue and a few other freaks.

"SECULAR JEW RUN MEDIA" this is a quote....


are these the Neo Conservative values?
-Hate
-Bigotry
-Rigging Elections
-Murder
-Plunder
-Torture w/ sexual depravity
-Corruption


Then Buchanan comes back from the break and says how the EXIT POLLS said it was VALUES AND THE IRAQ WAR. Exit polls? They said Bush LOST how did he miss that tidbit.

They are out of control, mad with the power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. serious. they like the exit polls for some explanations but then
trash them when said exit polls show a kerry win

and yes - hate is just about what you can call it. i dont know how you can watch that stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I cant and dont watch it.
My wife dragged me in front of the TV for all of 2 minutes. About all I could take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. i understand
theres another thread in this forum about this and someone posted they had called the msnbc number to complain

one thing for sure: the collective hypocritical faction of the right - whether government or media - continues their hate in different ways because they can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Buchanan? He is not a neo-con
He dislikes the neo-cons and wants to take the Republican party back from them. He's been a strong opponent of the war from the beginning, though that didn't stop him from endorsing Bush and trashing Kerry. I don't think Scarborough qualifies as a neo-con either.

That comment does looks like something Buchanan would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jesus is on the cover of both Newsweek and Time.
How on earth did they break away from the "secular Jew-run media"? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Minus World Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. What if these fools threw a TV party
and nobody came?

If you are familiar with the concept of Manufacturing Consent, then you will understand that these networks are nothing more than a propaganda arm of the government. Knowing that, would you expect them to do anything less than de-emphasize facts which are harmful to their greater narrative, and emphasize the ones that are helpful? If not in such an obvious manner, consider the fact that they, like any good advertising agency, (except, they're a 24/7 advertisement for the Pentagon) tend to choose stories and news items which pander to our deepest cultural dogmas.

The media have done a wonderful job, not only in distracting the right-wing, like dogs, with wedge issues to chew on; they have been unexpectedly successful in distracting the left, by enraging us at their blatant lack of objectivity.

If every intelligent American made a conscious decision to permanently cut their I.V. drip of sugary-sweet cable news, and refused to give money to the sponsors which enable American Pravda to subsist, much of the problem would cease to exist -- immediately.

Do yourself a favor and pry yourself from MSNBC, my friend. Many of us have done the same, and are better off for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I find it oddly hilarious when Hannity, Scarborough, Limbaugh, O'Reilly,
or some other miserable right-wing cretin sits in a comfy corporate-owned chair in a corporate-owned studio at a corporate-owned network...

and spends several hours a week complaining about the liberal media that supresses conservative views.

I don't watch that crap, but the concept still amuses me on some bizarre level. It's something akin to Donald Trump griping about not getting a job in a Las Vegas casino. Or Bill Gates complaining that he can't get a job in the computer business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Minus World Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Increasingly,
it becomes apparent that we are all slaves, watching dejectedly through the gated entry as the boss has a poolside chat with a colleague about his poor state of affairs.

Sometimes, it helps to be able to laugh about these things. However, I'm immediately grounded back in reality once I realize how disgusting all of this must look to the rest of the intelligent world, which remains largely uncorrupted by the greasy-fingered influence of derelict American culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I agree with you up to a point.
Then there's the part about knowing what your enemy is saying about you.

If you cut yourself off from all contact with the mainstream media, then you risk becoming even more out of touch than our enemies think we are. Knowing what these guys are saying while fully understanding what they are is helpful and what they are trying to do is helpful.

As on last night's wild and crazy right wing blowout it can also be pretty amusing. Sadly I missed most of it but I did catch the right wing Jewish guy screaming at Donahue and Buchanan.

It's fun when fundamentalists attack each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Dobbs and Tweety...
are the only ones I tune in to these days. That's about all I can handle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Minus World Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Cut the Cable.
I agree with you: a little opposition research is always required for a healthy understanding of the human discourse. In fact, I take issue with some DUers and their aversion to visiting FreeRepublic (or any other rabidly right-wing site) every once in a while, just to see how we're being perceived.

However, my greater problem is with those who turn on cable news and take it seriously; as though the networks have some unspoken, sworn duty to convey hard information to the American people, and they're inexplicably falling short of fulfilling that expectation.

My take is that there is deliberate misinformation going on, consisting of 24/7 right-wing reframing of even the most basic of debates, and it's very easy to get caught in the cycle of either believing what is being said, or becoming incredibly angry at those who do. Even at the expense of personal relationships.

The first step to counter the arguments of an individual who brings up, say, as an example, Teresa Heinz Kerry as a focal point of concern amidst our situation of constitutional crisis, is not to say: "Well, here are some positive points about Teresa Heinz Kerry, and I think you'd agree." But rather, to say: "I don't know why the hell you're focusing on trivialities like Teresa Heinz Kerry when X, Y and Z are problems which should be of much greater concern than such tabloid trivialities as a potential president's wife."

Such is true with countering any political distraction. Perspective is the key, and, unfortunately, the networks provide none.

We cannot keep working within the frame which is being created for us. What the body of the right wing has proven over the past decades, more than anything, is that it is adept at creating frames. If we want to put on MSNBC-sponsored boxing gloves and fight it out with idiots who think the second coming of Christ is about to occur, then we are bound to lose -- not because we lack in logic, but because we have chosen to fight on their turf, with their rules, which are invariably rigged in their favor.

It is very possible that these pundits are the "out-of-touch" ones, and that they represent nought but the interests of their overseers, which, in turn, represent the interests of the Fortune 500.

By steering the water-cooler discourse of middle-class America, they are creating mouthpieces for their own narrow set of values. And they can only steer these conversations if we allow them to. I suggest that we categorically reject their values, and thusly their networks, and refuse to engage in the petty distractions of the Scarboroughs and Hannities of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nascarblue Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Excellent point. I find I watch to get a peek at what to expect
this administration has gotten pretty predictable. I can watch these shows once in awhile and they're very telling about what the Bushies have in mind. Its kind of like their test grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. Funny (Odd). They Liked the Secular-Jewish Votes for Shrub. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nascarblue Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Check out a sample transcript of his propaganda...
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 10:51 AM by nascarblue
BUCHANAN:Ole Anthony, let me begin with you. You‘ve been called a scourge of televangelists and of the prosperity gospel. Who and what are you talking about?

OLE ANTHONY, TRINITY FOUNDATION: Well, unfortunately, most of the successful televangelists on the air today, the only way they can stay on the air is by promoting this gospel of greed, the so-called 100-fold blessing or heavenly lotteries, as I call it.

And it‘s doing more harm to the body of Christ than anything else that‘s happening today.

BUCHANAN: Well, there are millions of folks, as a matter of fact, over 140 million, I believe, listen once a month to televangelists. They clearly are getting something out of this in their relationship with God in hearing about the problems of their lives addressed. And they certainly get something out of it. I mean, why are 140 million people wrong and Ole right?


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nascarblue Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. It doesnt matter what Buchanan is or isnt, fact is...
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 10:24 AM by nascarblue
He is out of control this week. All week long he's been pushing a seriously warped christiofascist agenda. It's like I'm watching Fox. Its obvious he's pushing the White House's agenda. Puppetmasters are pulling his strings. I suggest you write a letter otherwise MSNBC is headed to become another Fox. I suggest you shoot them an email...

joe@msnbc.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC