Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No WMD in Iraq? Proof the "coalition" is hiding them!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 12:31 AM
Original message
No WMD in Iraq? Proof the "coalition" is hiding them!
Isn't that the logic the Bush regime used to promote the Iraq war?

The fact that they won't produce them proves they're hiding them from us. I think we need to send in another army to protect the rest of the world from the caolition forces who are obviously hiding tons of biological, chemical and nukular weapons.

They could launch an attack on any country in 45 minutes, fer krist's sake!

Click Here To See Fair & Balanced Buttons, Stickers & Magnets!>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant!
I shall steal this idea and post it everywhere. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-03 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Considering we have over 30,000 tons of chemical weapons in storage
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/South/08/28/chemical.weapons.ap/index.html

"The military contends incinerating the weapons is far safer than storing them. Some 2,254 tons of Cold War-era chemical weapons are stored in dirt-covered concrete bunkers at the depot, which houses about 7 percent of the nation's chemical stockpile. The United States agreed to destroy the weapons under an international treaty."

____

Basically, by my calculations, the US has a stockpile of 32,300 tons of them sitting around. (the 32,200 number is arrived by using the above 2,524 tons being 7% of the total stockpile, also that number is only chemical weapons, and does not include any biological stocks).


I'm guessing the coalition just wanted to build up that stockpile some :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC