Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Ashcrofts resignation a pre-emptive move...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lostnote03 Donating Member (850 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:23 PM
Original message
Is Ashcrofts resignation a pre-emptive move...
....to take the heat off of the DOJ if/when the issue of vote fraud is challenged in the courts.....the GOP will need a less controversial AG when they squelch the investigations.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, like Rudy
Would America's Mayor lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ya think? Here is a person who divorced his SECOND wife
and didn't even tell her in person of his intentions. It was all on TV. The temerity of this slug!

Then he takes his new girlfriend to Gracie Mansion where his wife and son live. He is disgusting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Geez, I agree. Rudy is bad news
Plus, he will either have to flip/flop on the issues of gay rights and abortion rights or he will never get backing from the evangelicals. I just don't see it happening, plus Rudy is pulling in some big bucks on the speaker circuit. Why tolerate the hassle of being the President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oddtext Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. that's what i thought
perhaps he can't keep a lid on fitzgerald anymore in Plame and the fbi in a surmised vote fraud investigation.

i was also surprised that don evans left. how long has that bastard been with w? didn't he run his first campaign?

it's not unusual that these things happen when a prez is "reelected" but this is nt the most usual of preznintcies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rumors of Ashcroft resigning came up pretty fast
I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but I'm wondering if Ashcroft wasn't willing to play a part in the "squelching". Yes, the man has weird view of civil rights, etc. with the Patriot Act and all, but backing up election fraud? That's some REALLY heavy shit for an AG. I don't recall his name being on the list of those most likely to not stay for a second term, like Rumsfeld, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ashcroft didn't perform to the fundies expectations
After all dancing is STILL legal.

Our next AG will be...(drum roll please...) BRUCE TAYLOR

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/porn/interviews/taylor.html

Humble civil servant who has dedicated his life to government. Be afraid - very afraid.

You heard it here first, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. What are the chances of a future Justice Ashcroft?
shivvvvvver...:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. If it was pre-emptive, he would have resigned before the election
as a signal that he is too partisan to carry out the functions he was appointed to perform.

No, I take this as a bad omen. He's getting ready to be appointed to SCOTUS or some post where his fundamentalism is even more detrimental to the Constitution than the prior one if that's possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckettgirl Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. others in DU have said otherwise
I have seen it posted that Ashcroft can't be a supreme court justice because he didn't ever have experience as a judge. His life was politics and nothing else....they said that supreme court justices have spent lots of time as judges before being appointed there....
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if "Justice" (or whoever that statue is)
will be "freed" from her drapery bonds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. My 2 cents: Yes! But for different reasons...
Edited on Tue Nov-09-04 08:03 PM by chiburb
I think HE was the one who leaked Plame's name to Novak or others. If an indictment is coming down, better to put some distance between him and WH...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dancing_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ashcroft was such a key figure in the 9/11 propaganda coup
On which the whole Bush Regime has been based.

He must have a reason to be getting out while the getting is good.

He must have reason to believe that something is about to give.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC