Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just for fun.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 10:23 PM
Original message
Just for fun.
SIZE DOES MATTER, Kerry to Win Easily
by Larry S. Rolirad

Polls, pundits and politics. Had enough? Well, folks, you can forget all of political rhetoric you have been hearing from both sides of the political spectrum. Toss it. Chunk it. It is no longer relevant.

What does matter is a one hundred year statistical record which fairly well confirms a win this November for Senator John Kerry.

In the last one hundred years in US history the tallest presidential candidates received more popular votes in 88% of the elections, and won 84% of the time. This year's election pits presidential contender, Senator John F. Kerry at a whopping height of 6 foot 4 inches against President George W. Bush, who's height is a 'paltry' 5 feet 11 inches. Since the shorter candidate for president lost 84% of the time since 1904, President Bush's chances of winning in 2004 appear very slim.

The last time we had a president as tall as Kerry's 6 foot 4 inch frame it was 140 years ago, and the president was Abraham Lincoln. If Kerry wins in November he will match our tallest president's height.

Since 1904, only three times has the shorter candidate received more popular votes in the election. The first happened in the 1940 election where presidential challenger, Wendell L. Willkie at 6' 2 1/2" lost to Franklin D. Roosevelt at 6' 2". The other two shorter candidates who managed to buck the odds and win the most popular votes were Richard M. Nixon at 5' 11 1/2" and Jimmy E. Carter at 5' 9 1/2", in years 1972 and 1976; respectively.

There are several other statistics that spell doom for another Bush win in this year's election. GW Bush is the first president to preside over a net loss of jobs during his watch since President Herbert Hoover, seventy-two years earlier. Under Hoover, the net loss of jobs was a whopping negative 9.0 percent. Under Bush, the loss of jobs was a negative 0.8 percent. No other presidents in the past hundred years has had a net loss of jobs. Only Presidents Hoover and Bush share that dubious "distinction".

Like Herbert Hoover, President Bush is a republican incumbent president who facing a taller challenger for reelection. President Hoover at 5' 11" lost to challenger Franklin D. Roosevelt at 6' 2'. And President Bush is facing Senator John Kerry, a challenger who is a whopping 6' 4".

There are a lot of similarities between Bush and Hoover. Both men share the same height at 5 foot 11 inches. Both men were republicans. Both men were incumbents when they faced taller opponents. And Hoover had two sons (Herbert Clark Hoover and Allan Henry Hoover) while Bush had two daughters (Barbara and Jenna). There is a certain Yin and Yang about this. GW Bush is even a distant cousin to Herbert Hoover, but related nevertheless. Samuel Prescott Bush, George W. Bush's great grandfather, was an Ohio manufacturer who was also a close advisor to President Herbert Hoover. And if President Bush is defeated, he will share the same distinction with President Hoover as both being one-term presidents.

Another curious connection between Presidents Hoover and Bush occurs if you add up all of the digits in the year republican President Hoover lost, or "1932", the total is "six", or 1+ 9+3 +2 =15, then add the digits in "15", or 1+5=6. Now add up the digits in the current year in which Bush is running for office, or "2004", you get the same common number, or 2+0+0+4=6.

The same number "6" is also common to both presidents in one other way. Herbert Clark Hoover contains 6 vowels, Herbert (2) Clark (1) Hoover (3), or 2+1+3=6; as does George Walker Bush, George (3) Walker (2) Bush (1), or 3+1=6.

Herbert Hoover was born in 1874 and GW Bush in 1946. If you add all of the digits in each birth year the total is 20 for each president, Herbert Hoover, 1+8+7+4=20, and GW Bush, 1+9+4+6=20.

Lastly, if Kerry wins he will match Lincoln's height as the tallest presidents in our history. Both Lincoln and Kerry were 6 foot 4 inches. Abe Lincoln and Senator Kerry share another similarity. With a Kerry win he will match Lincoln's age when he was elected in 1864. Lincoln was 59 in the 1864 election and Kerry will be 59 at the time of the 2004 election.

Statistics don't lie. My money is on a Senator John Kerry win.


1904
Theodore Roosevelt (Rep) 5'10" TALLER WINS
Alton B. Parker (Dem) 5' 9"

1908
William H. Taft (Rep) 6'0" TALLER WINS
William J. Bryan (Dem) 5' 10"

1912
Woodrow Wilson (Dem) 5' 11" TALLER WINS
Theodore Roosevelt (P) 5' 10"

1916
Woodrow Wilson (Dem) 5' 11" TALLER WINS
Charles E. Hughes (Rep) 5' 10"

1920
Warren G. Harding (Rep) 6' 0" TALLER WINS
James M. Cox (Dem) 5' 10"

1924
Calvin Coolidge (Rep) 5' 10" TALLER WINS
John W. Davis (Dem) 5' 9"

1928
Herbert Hoover (Rep) 5' 11" TALLER WINS
Alfred E. Smith (Dem) 5' 10"

1932
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Dem) 6' 2" TALLER WINS
Herbert Hoover (Rep) 5' 11"

1936
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Dem) 6' 2" TALLER WINS
Alfred M. Landon (Rep) 6' 0"

1940
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Dem) 6' 2" SHORTER WINS
Wendell L Willkie (Rep) 6' 2 1/2"

1944
Franklin D. Roosevelt (Dem) 6' 2" TALLER WINS
Thomas E. Dewey (Rep) 5' 8"

1948
Harry S Truman (Dem) 5' 9" TALLER WINS
Thomas E. Dewey (Rep) 5' 8"

1952
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Rep) 5' 10 1/2" TALLER WINS
Adlai Stevenson (Dem) 5' 10"

1956
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Rep) 5' 10 1/2" TALLER WINS
Adlai Stevenson (Dem) 5' 10"

1960

John F. Kennedy (Dem) 6' 0" TALLER WINS
Richard M. Nixon (Rep) 5' 11 1/2"

1964
Lyndon B. Johnson (Dem) 6' 1" TALLER WINS
Barry Goldwater (Rep) 6' 0"

1968
Richard M. Nixon (Rep) 5' 11 1/2" TALLER WINS
Hubert H. Humphrey (Dem) 5' 11"
George C. Wallace (Ind) 5' 10"

1972
George McGovern (Dem) 6' 1"
Richard M. Nixon (Rep) 5' 11 1/2" SHORTER WINS

1976
Gerald Ford (Rep) 6' 0"
Jimmy E. Carter (Dem) 5' 9 1/2" SHORTER WINS

1980
Ronald W. Reagan (Rep) 6' 1" TALLER WINS
Jimmy E. Carter (Dem) 5' 9 1/2"

1984
Ronald W. Reagan (Rep) 6' 1" TALLER WINS
Walter Mondale (Dem) 5' 11"

1988
George HW Bush (Rep) 6' 1 1/2" TALLER WINS
Michael Dukakis (Dem) 5' 8"

1992
Bill J. Clinton (Dem) 6' 2 1/2" TALLER WINS
George HW Bush (Rep) 6' 1 1/2"
Ross Perot (Ind) 5' 7"

1996
Bill J. Clinton (Dem) 6' 2 1/2" TALLER WINS
Bob Dole (Rep) 6' 1"
Ross Perot (Ind) 5' 7"

2000
Al Gore (Dem) 6' 1" *Most Popular Votes/Lost
George W. Bush (Rep) 5' 11" SHORTER WINS

2004
John F. Kerry (Dem) 6' 4 "
George W. Bush (Rep) 5' 11"


***Vice President Al Gore, the taller candidate in the 2000 election, received more than a half million more popular votes than his opponent, but lost to Governor George W. Bush, who received the most electoral votes in a very controversial win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kleptocrat Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-31-04 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's just stupid
Correlation is not causation. People aren't going to vote based on who's taller, they will vote for the guy who will represent them best.

It's like saying that since 90% of people who died last year ate a banana some time in the last 6 months of their life, then bananas must be fatal.

Howard Dean could have been 9 feet tall and only the morons would have voted for him - he would have lost 49 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC