Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The blueing of the West

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:00 PM
Original message
The blueing of the West
In the 70's and 80's, the West was almost part and parcel with the Sunbelt--conservative, Reaganesque, and riddled with fundamentalists. Then it began to change. Oregon and Washington were first to vote blue, going for Dukakis in 1988. They and California voted Democratic in the next three presidential elections. The specialist cities of Las Vegas and Phoenix are growing into suburbian cities--specifically, "blue" suburbian cities.
I sense a trend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. PLUS
In the next twelve years I see a definate trend of blueing in Nevada, New Mexico (already pretty blue actually), Colorado, and Montana. Not a lot of EVs, but puts a good perspective on where the neocons are all coming from. I'll give you a hint... they're all fighting a war, the rest of the world thought ended 138 years ago.

PS I am not saying all southerners think like that, just the southern neocons can't get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I cannot see Montana going blue anytime soon
but Arizona might be a good candidate. Nevada is already on the verge of going blue and I cannot for the life of me figure out why Colorado is red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Montana
May have given the world Marc Racicot, but it's a FAR better candidate at going blue than say, Ohio. The three top elected Republicans won their 2000 terms in very tight races, and the one top elected Democrat won in a landslide. The repub governor is very unpopular and in a meltdown, and if the election were held today would lose in a landslide to a week old ham sandwich. A democrat like Dean could win Montana IF they spent the time to campaign here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Gore lost Montana by more than 25 points
although that was mainly because of the gun issue, so Dean probably could win it if he seriously made an effort for it, but I doubt he would for the meager 3 EV. Gore only lost Ohio by 4 points, and he pretty much conceded the state a month before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Bush got a slight majority in Montana
Nader got a huge total here. Missoula County (SUPER LIEBERAL) went to Bush because the left was split because Gore gave up the state. If Gore had campaigned, he might not have won, but it would have been closer, and the gov, rep, and senate would have been won by dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-03 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Nader got 5.9%
a large amount, but not as high as some states. Bush got over 58%, more than a slight majority. In fact it's about equal to what he got in Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. because the outer parts of Colorado
are dominated by Mormons and fundies. But the worst part is the Colorado Springs area, where the Democrat party is virtually nonexistant. That helps cancel out the heavy Democratic voting of the Denver/Boulder area. But since that area is fast growing, the state's winnable in 2004 and will fall into our column some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I live in New Mexico...
...(thus the screenname), and it's wonderfully blue here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. about the Southern thing...
I know southern Democrats who aren't over the Civil War, but most people are centrist. The neocons that are here came from, or are influenced by neocons from the West. James frickin' Dobson, get out of my country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd love to get Idaho tilted a little more toward Blue
there's a lot of liberal types gathering around Couerdelane and Boise, etc.

Go for FLorida, NY, California...and the middle America states like Missouri, Wisconsin, etc...we can win this thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But OMFG...
...how would you ever convince those in Idaho Falls and other SLC-like cities to go blue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. just do like Oregon. Add lots of west coast libruls to the cities
you'd be surprised how 3 counties help to tip the scales so much toward Democrat in Oregon despite the wishes of all the farmers/rancers over in the less populated countryside.

Just keep bringing people in and gentrifying those play areas and the high tech parts of Boise and you could just possibly imagine swinging it in the next 5 to 10 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. If only.
The trouble with Idaho is with the pioneer stock "independents". They believe all the Republican lies told to them. If only the Democratic candidates could convince them as effectively, they would vote for a Democrat. They can't seem to understand that when you vote for a candidate, or "the man" as they say, they also vote for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. and also
the Mormons. The state is 33% Mormon, so already that's a large chunk of the electorate going GOP. I've heard there are a lot of fundie nutcases there too. I say it's at least another generation until we have a shot at Idaho or Wyoming. Utah is probably a lost cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I dunno.
I met one or more disgruntled Mormons when I lived in Idaho. I think the church is going to have to change their tune somewhat because a lot of the younger people are more liberal thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. We are really talking about the Pacific Slope here...
arnt we.??...the areas to the west of the Pacfic Crest Trail....the Great Basin (except for parts of Nevada) is pretty GOP.

There are some exceptions. New Mexico is sort of special politically.
And parts of Colorado vote Democratic (Denver and some Rocky Mountain areas).

The Mountain West and Great Basin seems pretty GOP, still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Actually, west of the Pacific Crest trail is quite liberal.
It is the eastern parts of Washington and Oregon where the ranchers and big irrigated farms are. There's logging over on this side (west) but the majority of the population here live in Seattle, Portland, Bellingham, Eugene, Medford, etc.

I think the coastal cities of N Cal are also liberal like Eureka, Mendocino, etc. Redding though is redd(neck)ing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC