Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Republican idea would you enthusiastically support?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:29 PM
Original message
Which Republican idea would you enthusiastically support?
I, for one, would heartily endorse a National Sales Tax.

As a managerial accountant who spent over 35% of my working time complying with IRS mandates I can see the giant waste that agency causes, and the enormous productivity gains that could be made by its abolition.

www.fairtax.org has a good plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. What Republican Idea
Real Republicans are few and far between. Do you mean Ne0-C0ns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thats funny you say that
because my view would be to have a low or no sales tax but an increased income tax on the wealthiest 1% as a result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. The one where they fund national health care
Yeah, that one.

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pay as you go
Wait, fiscal responsibilty USED to be a Republican ideal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. When was that? They have never been fiscally responsible
Review the fiscal records of Repub vs Dem. The Republicans simply call themselves fiscally responsible so they can slash gov. assistance programs while they scoop up the government pork for their rich friends.

Republican fiscal reponsibility is a MYTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. You did notice the tongue firmly implanted in cheek
didn't you?

:-)

As I said, they talk about it, but oops it has become a Democratic principle, one of those of.. actions speak louder than words.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. You must be a lousy accountant
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 10:34 PM by sangh0
if you can't look up the gross income on the chart.

The complexity with income taxes is determining income. Graduated tax rates have little to do with the complexity.

And that website is incredibly right-wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Two weeks before the election, you get so excited
you sign up with DU to start a thread promoting a right-wing bugaboo?

And then you try to pass yourself of as an accountant who is an authority on how inefficient and wasteful the IRS is?

You do realize that the IRS is the MOST efficient agency in the world, don't you? No other organization takes in so much money while spending so little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Shouldn't your profile list your hobby as "Internets"?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. And look at all the lovely right-wing orgs that your website links to
at http://www.fairtax.org/links.asp?PageID=27

American Enterprise Institute
American Legislative Exchange Council
Atlas Economic Research Foundation
Brookings Institution
CATO Institute
Claremont Institute
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Heartland Institute
Heritage Foundation
Hoover Institute
Hudson Institute
James Madison Institute
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Manhattan Institute
National Center for Policy Analysis
The National Center for Public Policy Research
Pacific Research Institute
Progress and Freedom Foundation
State Policy Network
National Retail Sales Tax Alliance (NRSTA) website
National Taxpayers Union
National Debt Awareness Center
Tax Foundation
Citizens for an Alternative Tax System
FreedomWorks
Americans for Tax Reform
Citizens Against Government Waste
National Small Business United
National Association of Manufacturers
National Federation of Independent Business
Small Business Survival Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. sangho, I don't know what it is you're arguing about.
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 11:13 PM by Rex_Goodheart
You're correct... the complexity of our income tax system is the measurement of income. The huge bureaucracy that is the IRS exists because the code that governs that measurement is complicated and extensive.

A national sales tax would eliminate almost all of that complexity. In fact, a management accountant's reporting responsibilities to the IRS would decrease dramatically. Instead, he'd be filling out sales tax reports, which can very easily be piggybacked onto existing state sales tax reports. It takes me about 15 minutes every month to do sales taxes, compared to endless hours to do annual Federal income taxes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
47. You forget that there are people like me on a fixed income.
All of my income comes from Social Security Disability. It's not subject to income tax so I am exempt from the fair, progressive income tax. However, just about everything I receive is used up consuming things. An increase in the tax on consumables would be a very significant tax hike for me - and I barely get by as it is now. I am a retired CPA. I prepared both income tax and sales tax returns for my clients. It's NOT that hard if you have a basic knowledge of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
62. Bullshit. A national sales tax would hit the poor the hardest
PRogressive taxation protects the poor.

And I agree with Sangho...it's pure crap that you register then push a right wing agenda here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recidivist Donating Member (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
51. Re: complexity and the need for reform.
I did my own income taxes for years. Then, a few years ago, I started doing some freelancing and, about the same time, adopted a child. I was knocked out of the do-it-yourself box immediately.

After skimming the mind-numbingly complex instructions, I gave up and turned it over to an accountant who promptly produced a 12 page return. Piece of cake for a professional, I guess. So now I spend $250 a year to save myself the headache.

Tax returns even for very small business can run into dozens of pages, and whole forests are felled for larger companies. This country now spends hundreds of billions every year on a massive tax preparation industry.

All this is, strictly speaking, pure waste. If we had a rational tax code, we could dispense with most of it. There are several ways to significantly simplify the tax code. All of them involve closing the special interest loopholes and, on the other hand, cutting the nominal rates. The more radical ones also propose eliminating double taxation and consolidating our multiple and overlapping tax systems (corporate income taxes, individual income taxes, property taxes, payroll taxes, etc.) into a unitary format. Worth doing, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bad, bad, bad.
This is another tax on the working class that can only be justified if it only applies to Humvees and yachts.

We need to move toward taxing wealth, which we don't do seriously. The wealthy (meaning ownership) pay practically no taxes for the privilege.

Accountants, tell everyone the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Sorry, but owning things is not a privilege in a capitalist society
I am all for taxing INCOME, but do you seriously want to tax wealth?

If I hit the lottery, and pay all my taxes like a good citizen when I aquire the income, do you want to then tax anything I save year after year?

I'm confused.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I'm all for not taxing wages on anyone..
Interest income, rental income, or any kind of income that comes from investments should be taxed. Your lotto would be safe with me, except for maybe a 10% administration tax. :-). Wages should be taxed when the wage earner reaches the top third of the scale. There are not too many earners up there and you can be sure all these execy types will make sure their income falls under that figure.

This brings us up to those parachutey things and other perks executives have figured out on how to rob corporations of. They should be taxed at 75%. Oh, I can think of so many other ways to tax real wealth, not piddly stuff you are upset about, but not tonight :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
54. THERE ya go! That's the ticket!
I like it. If you actually WORK for it, you should keep it. (And I don't mean making phone calls and playing golf with your broker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #27
58. Sorry I didn't get a chance to respond - left work at midnight
Except for a few tax-exempt type bonds, interest income is already taxed the same as wages. Net rental income (income - expenses) is also taxed as ordinary income.

The only tax break is on capital gains, when you sell an asset for more than you paid for it.

To tax these types of income at a higher rate would discourage investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
64. Taxing the capital gains on what you save is just
The whole reason to HAVE progressive taxation is that if you USE that wealth to grow and support society and the economy, you get deductions or REWARDED for contributing to society...if you only live off your money and don't contribute to society, then yes, you pay a tax for NOT being productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here we go again.
I was wondering when this was coming. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You can set your clock to it
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
42. The sad part is
This thread will have close to 200 replies before anyone gets wind of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
50. It's been coming the last 36 hours
at least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #50
69. No doubt
How many republican ideas do we have to put up with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. A balanced budget was a good idea where did that go?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randi_Listener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here we go again
It's non stop.

ENOUGH!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. I Am AGAINST A National Sales Tax
because it, like all sales taxes, are regressive, meaning that it hurts poor people more than rich people.
Unless you made all basic life necessities exempt from the National Sales Tax, I could not support such a plan.

Basic Life Necessities: Food (not restaurant food, i mean food you cook for yourself at home!! Restaurant food damn well ought to be taxed, since that is a luxury...), Clothing, Shelter (this includes heat in winter and/or A/C in summer for those who live in extreme climates), Education (I mean college here!! Private school for grades K-12 is also a luxury, and should be subject to the tax, as we have an adequate public school system,) Medical and Dental Care (this INCLUDES preventative medicine and hygiene products, like soap!!,) and reliable transportation to and from work (i.e. a normal family sedan should not be subject to such tax...but a fucking HUMMER damn well oughta be!!)
You get my drift....basically, what I am saying is that a National sales tax on LUXURY ITEMS is okay with me...but no on items one needs for basic survival...this should NOT be taxed. A new TV?? Not a life-necessary item...tax it! A new pair of jeans?? Clothing...life essential...do not tax it.
If the national sales tax was set up in this way, I could, perhaps, then support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Uh when you work 60-80 hours a week
Restaurant food is not a luxury. It is a necessity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Uh....
Edited on Fri Oct-15-04 11:03 PM by mermaid
If there were no income tax, and the items you needed for survival were not taxed, you would not NEED to work 60-80 hours a week!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. visit fairtax.org
The fairtax plan exempts necessities by sending automatic rebate checks to everybody. Poor people who buy nothing BUT necessities would pay nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. How About NOT TAXING THE FUCKING STUFF IN THE FIRST PLACE?!!?!?
FUCK REBATE CHECKS!!!

Survival items should NEVER BE TAXED IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
48. How are the rebates received - is there paperwork required?
Who is responsible for filing for the rebate? If the purchaser is that would make it impossible for a lot of the people who deserve a tax break to get it because they wouldn't have the wherewithal to file for it. If the merchant is resquired to keep up with the paperwork for a rebate system that just adds another level of complexity and paperwork. Either way it doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
65. Fairtax.org is a rightwing site promoting other right wing sites.
Are you lost on the world wide web?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
67. Where will the homeless collect their rebate check?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fiscal responsiblity
When you ar ein debt, you need to cut back.
Unfortunatly it seems an idea that the republicans have abandoned.

And let me add another problem. Fiscal responsibility includes the MILITARY and CORPORATE WELFARE. Two blind spots the repubs always seem to have had.

I could probably think of a few others. ironicly a lot of republiucan ideas are good. But those came from peopel like TR, eisenhower and (weirdly) Nixon that became DEMOCRATIC Ideals (like Conservation, the EPA and government regulation of business ot prevent abuse). Now modern republicans seem intent on destroying the things thier party did right so they no longer count as REPUBLICAN IDEAS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueknight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. that they all drink
some of jim jones kool aid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. What rate would the national sales tax have to be to generate....
....sufficient revenues to balance the $2.6 trillion federal budget which Bush submitted? 10%? 15%? 20%? 25%? With a GDP of $11.5 trillion I suppose that number could be roughly calculated as 22.6% if every transaction that goes to make up the GDP is taxed. But I believe that there will be exemptions so if it is only consumption that is taxed, the figure may be closer to 50%, perhaps higher. No consumption, no tax you say. Well, you have to have shelter, will new homes be taxed? Will rent be taxed? Electricity? Fuel? Goods and services? What government services will be eliminated to reduce the federal budget? Department of Justice? FBI? CIA? Education? Social services? Transportation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. how about less intrusive government?
one that doesn't peek into people's bedrooms, their uteruses or their computers.

Isn't that supposed to be a republican idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Notafraid Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. I
Have never seen any Republican only idea i would ever support,to much social Darwinism in any Republican plan,another thing i have noticed with a lot of Republican plans is the hope factor.the hope it might work but if it doesn't we are screwed this might be needed in the business world but when it comes to people then thats a no go.

I don't think there is any problem with our current tax system other then to many tax loopholes and not near enough audits on the wealthy and giant corps cheating the IRS daily.we had a surplus under Clinton,i say if we have a surplus we are doing something right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. Find me one thing they really believe in
beside themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Ok...
They believe in POWER. They believe in BIG BUSINESS and the wealthy. They believe in the exploitation of lower and middle class working Americans...

FUCK THE REPUBLICANS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
52. Here you go
Edited on Sat Oct-16-04 07:07 AM by JNelson6563
This should help you fully understand what Republicans believe in:

http://www.bushflash.com/ihr.html

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. yes, grinding to a crawl consumer based spending....
in a consumer based economy is a brilliant idea!! :eyes:

are there anymore winners in the GOP bag o' tricks? didn't think so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. NuttyFluffers, your objection doesn't make sense, frankly...
People would have more take home pay in their checks. Imagine your own check with no Federal tax deduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. ...and then everything you want to buy is now that much more $$
can't get away from it, taxes have to appear somewhere. the quantity has to be the same considering the *size* of our nation. and since the business of a consumer based economy is to keep the money flowing the last thing you want to do is front load the taxes onto the lynchpin of the supply/demand dynamic. it really isn't very hard to figure out. it also encourages black markets too.

look up the trends in tobacco recently in california and new york. there's plenty of more examples. we make money when money *flows*, not when it sits in our pocket at the end of a paycheck. so we want to keep sales tax low and keep unproductive passive income generation(aka usury, aka interest, aka "capital investment returns") in check. there's a reason all the abrahamic faiths found usury as a sin, ti's because the results always sucked socially, nationally, and economically in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #34
49. Yeah, give a break to people who are able to work
and earn significant income while increasing the tax on the things consumed by people who make little to no taxable income under the current system. That's fair - not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
66. Yes imagine your grocery bill with federal taxes in it and try this
If you are among the lowest income earners, you end up paying MORE while if you are among the highest income earners, you end up paying BILLIONS less...wow...there's some parity for ya...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. The only tax we should have is a toilet paper tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I have big problem with Toilet Paper Tax.
It is slanted against one particular gender. Unfair. Try another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Trust me,when guys wipe their ass the make up for the difference
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I Disagree!!
Girls wipe THEIR asses, too, you know...and we also gotta wipe when we do number one. Y'all guys just shake off and go. We girls can't just shake off. We gotta wipe. So we use more toilet paper than you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. no no no
when we wipe our asses we use twice as much....most men are scrunchers and use big globs of tp.

Or so I've heard :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #40
68. Thought dudes used the sports pages?
I always find the sports section in the bathroom. ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. how 'bout the one where they take baseball bats to liberals?
Is that a good republican idea? Ann Coulter thinks it is.

How about the Republican idea that we should ridicule those who want clean water, clean air, and to slow the extinction of species on the planet?

Is that a good republican idea?

There are NO good republican ideas.

Nada.

The only good republican idea is for them all to drown themselves, en masse, in a rock quarry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Ah, Screw That...
Not enough suffering in them drowning themselves in a rock quarry!! Thier crimes against humanity deserve a punishment with far more suffering than drowning in a rock quarry would provide!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. yeah, let them all torture each other in Abu Ghraib
there's a nice little hell on earth they'd deserve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
41. You mean current ideas? Or in general..?
Just one off the top of my head, I support school vouchers..

Heyo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
43. Have a drink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
45. "Fair tax"? Is that like Bush's "clear skies" & "healthy forests"?
Yeah, I thought so. :eyes:

Flat taxes & sales taxes always favor the rich. I definitely do *not* support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
46. I support no Republican ideas.
The National Sales Tax is an especially bad one. Refer to the last 5,000 threads on the subject.

This is Democratic Underground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
53. Reform of the tax laws is in the interests of all americans
The DU response to national sales tax is that it is "regressive
taxation", that shifts even more tax burden on to the poor who do
the most consuming.

I believe, however, that such a tax can be implemented to be
"progressive", by completely computerizing the whole tax system
and going "paperless".

Then i support the progressive sales tax, as a direct computerized
deduction from all payments wired straight to the IRS. The savings
would eliminate the need for tax compliance, the tax courts and
a tremendous load of overhead and ambiguity that stifles development.

In my vision of it, there would be a single system like "peoplesoft
financials" running in the treasury, that replaced the social
security system and the IRS systems. This "primary" data system
would be connected to all payment networks and get real-time tax
deducations from every payment made, based on the item purchased,
and the social security number of the purchaser at the point of sale.
(from the payment account). Even salaries would be so taxed, as
well as all payments in businesses, a giant 100% applicable variable
transaction tax.

In short, i could develop a tax system that would save americans
billions of dollars, whilst providing a more progressive lightweight
"clear" framework than is running today. (by taxing salaries,
the income tax porton would still exist, but as a flat tax on the
payment). As well, i would include that flat tax on capital
purchases like stock market and foreign exchange, to get the
capital markets aligned with long term thinking, that buying/selling
stocks for 4 hours is not adding value, despite the hogwash
theories that stock exchanges have fantisized.

Bottom line, mate, this is DU, and with the election so near,
this issue is percieved as supporting republicanism, even if it is
not.... as everyone here is extremely partisan and any joining
with the enemy contributes towards fascism. In that regard,
perhaps its best to discuss this after nov 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
55. strange question from a new poster
The repukes have NO idea I would enthusiastically support!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
56. Less government involvement in our personal lives!
They talk the talk, but the "Patriot Acts" I and II prove that they don't walk the walk!

Why do they need to know what I read?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
57. None of them.
ESPECIALLY that "National Sales Tax" CRAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
59. I like the End Times
Only it's the damn nazi reThugs that all go down in a fiery, hellish blaze, and we Libruhls is SAVED!

j/k, all their ideas fundamentally suck elephant hemmeroids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
60. not one world-destroying thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mccormack98 Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
61. The idea that Republicans should resign en masse ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
63. I support their idea of a rapture, where they all get whisked away
to Lala Land. I assume I'll be staying here, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
70. A sales tax discourages American spending and selling to Americans.
Edited on Sat Oct-16-04 03:46 PM by w4rma
It creates a huge burdon on small buisnesses, by raising their prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
71. I'm beginning to think off-shore tax shelters might be good.....
at least tax moneys won't be going towards death, fascism, and corporate welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
72. Mass ritualistic suicide they are a cult after all so it's only a
matter of time before this comes up & I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-16-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
73. A national sales tax
only fucks the poor in the exact same spot the (p)Resident likes to keep his head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC