Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon's Lip and Bush's Palsy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:54 AM
Original message
Nixon's Lip and Bush's Palsy
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 11:06 AM by Minstrel Boy
Added to my blog here: http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/10/nixons-lip-and-bushs-palsy.html

Nixon's Lip and Bush's Palsy



Stop kicking Dick Nixon around, already. The beads of sweat on his lip are on account of the flu. The five o'clock shadow is because he chose not to wear make-up. That he showed up for the first televised presidential debate "as is" should be commended, not excoriated.

Some pundits compare George Bush to Nixon. If only things were that bad. And not just for us. Judging from Bush's bizarre appearance and performance in the debates, he's not just an evil clown; he's a very sick man.

Last night was genuinely frightening.

There again was the box affixed to his back beneath his jacket. Is it a prompter? A hearing aid? A drug pump? The only hard denial from the Bush camp has been to rule out a bullet-proof vest. Otherwise, serious questions are answered with the familiar refrain of "Elvis," "aliens" and "conspiracy theories"; the off-the-rack ridicule delivered whenever they can't answer a charge.

While it's refreshing to see a story like the "box" go mainstream ("Technical Expert: Bush Was Wired"), there is so much more that hasn't, and won't. For instance, what the hell was wrong with his face?

Draw a line down the middle, and you could see two different Bushes. The left corner of his mouth was drooping egregiously, and his right eye was screwed up in a perpetual squint. He looked as though a blindfolded child had played pin-the-eyebrows-on-the-monkey.

Again, one hour into the debate, Bush's mood dramatically shifted down, as though his medication was wearing off. The manic whoops and cackles and bizarre associations were replaced by a sluggish, drowsily indifferent delivery. Simply put, he crashed.

The final debate also saw the white spitball at the right edge of his lip, resembling the classic "cotton mouth" side-effect of certain medications.

Finally, the clincher that there's nothing Elvis-like about this particular "conspiracy theory": Bush has postponed his annual physical until after the election. In 2001, 2002 and 2003, Bush had his check-up in August. What's different about this year? An election hasn't prohibited previous presidents from taking their physicals, not even Ronald Reagan.

In other words, what's Bush's problem? Because undoubtedly he has one. Has he suffered a mild stroke? Does he have seizures? (How many times must he "fall off the bike" or "choke on a pretzel" before his frequent facial abrasions sound alarm bells?) Was the left side of his face frozen to quell his smirk reflex? Could he be afflicted with pre-senile dementia?

His incompetence isn't simply "Dubya being Dubya." Watch this video, courtesy of "Bushbuzz", which contrasts his performance in 2004 with the Texas gubernatorial debate in 1994. The deterioration is striking. The Bush of ten-years ago speaks without stumbling or hems and haws. He's capable of formulating coherent arguments and is a competent debater. Something has happened in the interim, and is still happening to him.

Those who prefer Roman to Nixonian analogies have compared Bush to Caligula or Nero. Perhaps a case could be made in 2000, but both Caligula and Nero led Rome in its health; all their madness and excess could not destroy it. But even then, Bush arose to power - and could have arisen to power only - in the twilight of American Empire. The Empire isn't a Bush/Cheney creation. Let's be honest. It's been an on-the-ground reality for decades, and responsible for millions of deaths. But apart from the front lines of the latest War on Something, it presented, generally, a benign face to the world. That has markedly changed with the Bush years, perhaps because of the exegencies of oil and gas and the bubble-nature of US fiscal health. The seizure of power in 2000 afforded the neoconservative, neoliberal imperialists the opportunity to lengthen the years of American hegemony by employing the US military as an aggressive economic weapon. But as soft power is replaced by coersive, the more fragile the American Empire is revealed.

And after four years of his cheerleading the precipitous ruin of the Homeland formerly known as the United States, Bush does not deserve to be compared with even the worst Julio-Claudian.

Call him, rather, the deranged Elagabulus, the last Antonine. His reign ended in his murder, and his body was dragged through the streets and thrown, weighted, into the Tiber. The Senate ordered his name erased from history.

But Elagabulus had it in his power only to destroy Rome, and Bush doesn't care about history, since "we'll all be dead."

Let's all pray he's not really that sick.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
getoffmytrain Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just a thought...
Maybe there is a plan for Bush to win the election... get his physical and then not long after he is inaugurated, resign based on medical reasons and let Dick Cheney finish out his term... Perhaps all of this is a ploy to make the real actor, Dick Cheney, the president.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I wonder if that happened
whether Americans would stand for it. It would be clear that Bush had perpetrated fraud by skipping his physical. But, well, 2000 was pretty clear too, and most stood for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getoffmytrain Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Does anything surprise you much
these days? Not much does me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. My wife said exactly that last night. Palsy
She said all the symptoms were evident, twisted smile (one corner of mouth up and one down) and the constant blinking and eyebrows opposite of each other. He does have a medical problem and they are not being up front about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanparty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. It WAS NOT a communication device ...

Bush has been previously noted with VERY SMALL "in-the-ear" devices. You don't NEED a box that size to communicate. Shit, there are cell phones 1/10 the size of "the box".

Perhaps those "in-the-ear" devices were banned???? In which case, they might have been transmiting sound into his bones in a way that cannot be detected. But I seriously doubt the Republicans would agree to such a constraint given that they largely controlled the formats!!!!

My guess is that it's a nuero-stimulator. If Bush really DID suffer a mild stroke he probably has a degree of palsy. I have noted that Bush exhibted a VERY WEIRD half smile, half grimace all night. Basically, he looked like Charlie Brown. I also notice that his shoulders were "hunched" most of the night. I chalked this up to being "tense" during the debate. But the prescence of a stimulator between his shoulder blades could defintely cause his shoulders to involuntarily "bunch up" like that.

A localized loss of nuero-muscular control could account for all of this. The stimulator neutralizes the palsy out but leaves a "stiffness" behind.

Seriously, I wish that Kerry had given bush a great friendly slap on the back after the debate ;-) Than maybe we'd find out what that box is for !!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Makes me rethink the pretzel incident...
...you don't suppose he had a stroke...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. arms
in the last few months his arms/hands are held at such freakish angles... I have been saying it looks like a neuro problem...

It could all stem from meds, though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Whatever it was,
it wasn't a pretzel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides
By DOUG THOMPSON
Jun 4, 2004, 06:30
Email this article
Printer friendly page


President George W. Bush’s increasingly erratic behavior and wide mood swings have the halls of the West Wing buzzing lately as aides privately express growing concern over their leader’s state of mind.
In meetings with top aides and administration officials, the
President goes from quoting the Bible in one breath to obscene tantrums against the media, Democrats and others that he classifies as “enemies of the state.”

Worried White House aides paint a portrait of a man on the edge, increasingly wary of those who disagree with him and paranoid of a public that no longer trusts his policies in Iraq or at home.
“It reminds me of the Nixon days,” says a longtime GOP political consultant with contacts in the White House. “Everybody is an enemy; everybody is out to get him. That’s the mood over there.”

In interviews with a number of White House staffers who were willing to talk off the record, a picture of an administration under siege has emerged, led by a man who declares his decisions to be “God’s will” and then tells aides to “fuck over” anyone they consider to be an opponent of the administration.

“We’re at war, there’s no doubt about it. What I don’t know anymore is just who the enemy might be,” says one troubled White House aide. “We seem to spend more time trying to destroy John Kerry than al Qaeda and our enemies list just keeps growing and growing.” Aides say the President gets “hung up on minor details,” micromanaging to the extreme while ignoring the bigger picture. He will spend hours personally reviewing and approving every attack ad against his Democratic opponent and then kiss off a meeting on economic issues.

....

"Tenet wanted to quit last year but the President got his back up and wouldn't hear of it," says an aide. "That would have been the opportune time to make a change, not in the middle of an election campaign but when the director challenged the President during the meeting Wednesday, the President cut him off by saying 'that's it George. I cannot abide disloyalty. I want your resignation and I want it now." Tenet was allowed to resign "voluntarily" and Bush informed his shocked staff of the decision Thursday morning. One aide says the President actually described the decision as "God's will."

God may also be the reason Attorney General John Ashcroft, the administration’s lightning rod because of his questionable actions that critics argue threatens freedoms granted by the Constitution, remains part of the power elite. West Wing staffers call Bush and Ashcroft “the Blues Brothers” because “they’re on a mission from God.” “The Attorney General is tight with the President because of religion,” says one aide. “They both believe any action is justifiable in the name of God.”

more
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:jh7IAzNgaOsJ:www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4636.shtml+Bush%27s+Erratic+Behavior+Worries+White+House+Aides&hl=en
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Psych profile+fascism receptivity+Lakoff's family framing concept
from JohnOneillsMemory

Psych profile+fascism receptivity+Lakoff's family framing concept links.

This is entirely predictable. Bush* suffers from severe mental illness as has been well documented. We're experiencing Columbine High School on a global level.

Georgie was abused by his mother, shadowed by his father, shamed for mourning his sister's death and belittled in general. He became a self-destructive alcoholic with a cruel streak.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1033904,00.html

(So George, How Do You Feel About Your Mom and Dad?)

His 'authoritarian personality' matches what researchers discovered to be a marker for 'fascism receptivity' when the phenomenon was researched after WWII.
http://www.anesi.com/fscale.htm
(The F-factor questionnaire)

More recently, researchers have analyzed the components of the conservative personality. Their findings point to the fear-based tendencies that are similar in fundamentalist religious views and fascism receptivity, again the 'authoritarian personality.'
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/22_politics.shtml
(What Makes Up a Conservative Personality)

This family experience modeling sets us up for how we view all our relationships at work and in government, too. Linguist George Lakoff explains how this 'framing' is used in political language and propaganda.

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/10/27_lakoff.shtml
(Lakoff Explains Framing as Key to Thinking)

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=12&ItemID=4294
(Lakoff Explains Gender Language in Promoting War)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulljump Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nixon
Nixon had a microphone. He was the one sending messages to Bush I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. The actual reports from his 2002 and 2003 exams have not been published
Only the August 4, 2001 medical examination bearing the names of his examining physicians and in their own words has been published (to my knowledge).
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010804-2.html

Other than second hand accounts from Bush's press secretary and interviews of his doctor in the press, I can find no medical summaries from Bush's annual examinations from 2002 or 2003 in the words of his examining physicians. There's nothing published bearing the detail of that August 4, 2001 summary, nor anything that describes a review of Bush's medical record or his current symptoms or use of medication.

In that August 4, 2001 examination, Bush was reported to have a resting heart rate of 43 bpm. That's unusually low and would be typical of a younger long-distance runner. Bush may jog a bit but I don't think he's that physically fit. It is said that his pretzel fainting incident resulted not from choking but from his condition of low heart rate, called "brachycardia", which I believe is defined as a resting heart rate below 65 bpm (70 being normal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC