Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry to W: Tell the truth (full text of yesterday's remarks)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:51 PM
Original message
Kerry to W: Tell the truth (full text of yesterday's remarks)
Remarks of Senator John F. Kerry on Iraq

Washington, DC

July 10, 2003

“It’s been days since the President was flown to an aircraft carrier to announce that hostilities in Iraq had ended.  Now, clearly, it’s time for the President to step forward and tell the truth that the war is continuing and so are the casualties.

To tell the truth that our forces face an ongoing challenge simply to protect themselves. We need to look at this from the perspective of those in the field—who are taking fire every day; who do not know friend from foe; who have no idea when they will come home.  It is time for the President to tell the truth that we lack sufficient forces to do the job of reconstruction in Iraq and meet the President's goal of withdrawing in a reasonable period.

To tell the truth that America should not go it alone—that international support to share the burden is as critical now as it should have been in the months leading up to the war.  We now know that the State of the Union message, well after the vote on the Iraq resolution, contained information that was wrong—and at least some in the Administration knew it.

But just because a mistake was made, does not mean we should compound it by making further mistakes.  International support and alliances are not weakness, but strengths.  Diplomacy, cooperation, multilateralism, making friends in the world is not weakness as this administration would have some believe.

America is now viewed widely as an occupying power.  We face a resistance movement that is capable of gaining greater strength by the day.  And our service men and women remain vulnerable because they are too few to succeed in a peacekeeping mission for which they are neither trained nor equipped.

I believe there are four urgent steps that we should take in order to win the peace.

Number one—We increase overall troop strength with more allied troops with the right skills and training.  And that means particularly, that people with Arabic speaking skills, and even, hopefully, Muslims.  Without adequate security, every other peacekeeping goal is at risk.  That means you have to immediately offer NATO a role to give Allies a graceful way to participate.  Without real allies in real numbers, especially Arab-speaking, we are asking our young men and women to bear a needless risk for an length of time that is undescribed.  We also need greater United Nations involvement in the humanitarian and governance transformation. And the world needs to be invested in the outcome in Iraq

Second, we have to train Iraqis more rapidly to carry out what always was an obvious job—of restoring civil order in the aftermath of the victory.  The police functions have to be provided in an adequate form, we need to protect the people, and guarantee the safety of our own troops in that process.  Such an effort will require international police trainers and mentors as well as military trainers in an accelerated commitment.

Third, we have to lay out immediately and publicly a clear plan for the transfer of power to Iraqis as soon as possible.  The sense of American occupation works against our peaceful goals, works against the transformation of democracy ultimately, works against our troops and their safety, and works against our greater goals in the Middle East.  We promised the Iraqis democracy, but we’re sending mixed signals about really letting them run their own country.

Fourth, we must move more quickly to provide the basic services, such as electricity, and transportation.  Without economic recovery, the gap between the expectations and the reality will be a major retardant on popular support for the United States activities in Iraq.  Peacekeeping is linked to the humanitarian and to the governance transformation and the global investment in that is the fastest, most effective way to be able to strengthen our goals and provide safety to our troops.

We now know that the Administration went to war without a thorough plan to win the peace.  It is time to face that truth and to change course—to share the post-war burden internationally—for the sake of our country, for our standing in the world, and most of all for the young Americans in uniform who cannot be protected from enemy attack by an announcement, no matter how well staged, that hostilities are over.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. This statement rules
I can't take issue with a single word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. This, maybe:
But just because a mistake was made...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I figured Kerry was referring to his war vote obliquely
:)

Seriously though, I think the mistake he refers to is the mishandling of the war. He's not letting Bush off, as his statement "stop pointing fingers at the CIA, Bush" makes clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He's clearly referring to the SOTU address:
We now know that the State of the Union message, well after the vote on the Iraq resolution, contained information that was wrong—and at least some in the Administration knew it.

But just because a mistake was made, does not mean we should compound it by making further mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. If that's the case, in light of his other remarks
I have no problem with it. His statement that BUsh needs to take responsibility and not blame the CIA was right up my alley. Once I heard Dean's clarification on his "misled the president" bit, I didn't hold that statement against him.

I think the real "mistake" was letting the press get this out there. I'm surprised Rove and damage control weren't all over this. I expected him to "discover" a wiretap or something at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Fair enough.
But I think "deliberately misled" gets closer to the issue than "mistake." However, it's still early in the SOTU-gate story, and Kerry has to cover his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Andrea Mitchell missed Kerry's call for an investigation
a month ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MA_firebrand Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. i like it...
I am a dean supporter, but I love that comment. That was a strong statement, and Kerry sets and example for all with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC