Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN reported yesterday that our soldiers were being "assassinated"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:14 AM
Original message
CNN reported yesterday that our soldiers were being "assassinated"...
I caught a blip of this at work yesterday. Did anyone else catch this play on words? I wondered, "how do you get 'assassinated' when you are at war with a country"? Wouldn't "killed in action" be a more appropriate term? Lest we forget, we did bomb the hell out of them and invade their country. CNN could be a little more responsible with their wording, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nope. "Mission Accomplished".
Didn't you get the memo?
War's over.
These are "assassins", that whacko hashish-eating cult of Aye-rabs skulking around with those big ol' curved daggers.
Kris?
Death to the infidels!
"The Wily Pathan"
Shades of Kipling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, "assassinated," that's the ticket!
See, it's really just some lone gunman picking off American soldiers; the vast majority of Iraqis just lo-o-o-o-o-ve their liberators! And the soldiers can't get at the assassin because of all the grateful Iraqis dancin' in the streets! Yeah, that's it . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. If they would just seal off the Iraqi School Book Depository........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Irresponsible at best, toadying at worst
And if they're toadying on something like this, just wait until the campaign. Good thing there's a war chest of Bushisms just waiting to see the light of day. The man lies or stretched the truth about every third speech he gave. Hell, maybe every speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. assassins are loners
not an organized armed resistance. From your avatar I take it you remember a group called the VC.

Assasins are a minor threat to stability. Guerilla regimes=quagmire.

just more CNN whoring for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't remember any formal surrender being signed
Maybe I am wrong but I don't think anyone in authority signed an unconditionasl surrender. As far as I can tell the only ones who said the war was over was us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Doesn't it work that way?
It takes at least two parties to have a war.
If one of them says the war's over, then I guess that's that.
Isn't it?
I dunno.
This makes my head hurt.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. go to buzzflash
third col. third story about our troops being used as decoys..what the fuck? looks like we set up our own troops to be assassinated...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. So by that reasoning, NASCAR drivers are "speeders"
:)

Ha ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernfried Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. some think Tupak Shakur was assissanitated too, so what ?
you're just as dead irrespective of the lingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incognito Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. I heard a Repuke
talking head......SORRY, can't remember HER name....refer to the soldiers deaths as "serial killings". Why can't they just admit the damn war isn't over yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. They mixed up two Bush-murder categories.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. well, they do overstate what may be a valid point

Hussein's secret police is probably doing some of the killings, and likely in the style they're trained in.

That the killings are of individually unimportant military personnel and all about rule of the country makes "assassination" a bad semantic choice of words. The attempt is to talk about the method, but for soldiers they don't talk about "target exercises that were successful".

When they kill Bremer with an antitank rocket, _that's_ an assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. So what's the problem?
The shrub's gone on record approving the use of assassination by US forces against our evil enemies, so who should have a problem with everyone else following our lead? Turnaround's a bitch, ain't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. The Republicans just don't get the concept of "precedent."
Or "consequences." That's another toughie for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe it's because of this:

The Washinton Post had an article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28712-2003Jul8.html?nav=hptop_tb


This sentence from the article stuck out:

"He said the fatal, point-blank shooting of a soldier on Sunday at Baghdad University was the eighth incident that involved a shot to the neck area, above the soldier's flak jacket but below the helmet."

I can see how that could be construed as "assasination". After all, the war is over, right? </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. It means that they're being murdered standing in line.
People with small, easily concealed guns are walking up to our off-duty soldiers and putting bullets in their brains, then walking away.

Without a boo from the Iraqi bystanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-03 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. whats the difference?
Didnt Bob Barr relegalize assassination? Must be better than murder, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC