Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Iran Next?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 03:37 PM
Original message
Why is Iran Next?
Can you say "Oil Pipeline"? Read this excellent short history from Asia Times.


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FI28Ak01.html

The arrival of Western oil companies in Azerbaijan and the development
of that country's offshore energy infrastructure were treated with the
greatest levels of concern in Tehran. This was accentuated by Iran
missing out on a lucrative deal to act as a transit route for the
export of Azeri oil via the Persian Gulf. The Americans applied intense pressure to persuade all parties concerned to replace the most
convenient and economically efficient route (ie Iran) with the Turkish
port of Ceyhan - the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan route. Moreover, the Iranians
feared that oil exploration activities in the Caspian were beginning to encroach on its yet to be determined territorial waters. Thus in early 2001, the Iranian navy fired warning shots at an exploration boat belonging to BP and forced it to sail away.

The ever-increasing concentration of US energy interests in Azerbaijan
has brought the country under greater US influence. This influence grew exponentially after the terrorist assaults on September 11, 2001, to cover security and military fields. Indeed, the Americans seized the opportunity to establish a visible military presence in Central Asia and the Caucasus. Although publicly the Americans deny maintaining military forces in Azerbaijan, the Iranians have on numerous occasions complained to the Baku government about the presence of US military "advisers" in the country. The Iranians are also concerned about the concentration of US signals intelligence (SIGINT) resources in the south of the republic, close to the border with Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
obnoxiousdrunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because
Sharon says so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you say petroeuro?
That was Iraq's fatal mistake too - seriously considering changing their oil trade to euros. Iran is now doomed too unless they quit talking about it.

I honestly believe this is what it's all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC