Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the IBM Selectronic Typewriter have "Proportional Spacing".....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:03 PM
Original message
Did the IBM Selectronic Typewriter have "Proportional Spacing".....
on it?

Was this an option in the 1970's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lilymidnite Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, from personal experience
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:07 PM by enoel2
With a fancy Selectric, in the 1970's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Links
Here are thumbnails of old ads, from 1935 onward. Links are at the bottom: http://www.etypewriters.com/history.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zuzu98 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. there's a thread here somewhaere
I'll try to find it. It includes an ad from the 40's (I think) touting the proportional spacing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, From The Early Sixties - It Was A Selling Feature And Appeared
In their ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. yes
This has been discussed extensively. There are now (count 'em) 43 threads on DU with the word "proportional" and "spacing" in them from the last 24 hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes, worked in a law office &
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:13 PM by rozf
typed many a real property Deed on one. Also made it easier 2 fit names is prescribed spaces. Anyone who worked w/ this 'selectric', had a little plastic box w/ different fonts. U could pick what was needed or as the mood hit U. Had a 'courier' and a 'script' ball is all i can recall but I know that box held about 9 font balls....no probably 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. If you're referring to a standard Selectric
I don't remember proportional spacing. However, some models had "dual pitch," which meant the machine could be easily adjusted to use either "Elite" or "Pica" type sizes. Of course, type could be squeezed in if one was to use Pica type with Elite spacing.

The IBM Composer wasn't used as a typewriter. It was a typesetter and much more difficult to use. It wouldn't be used for daily tasks such as a letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lilymidnite Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. There were custom balls for Selectrics
I think. I had a pile of them in my desk. I typed in Greek and Russian script from time to time. I know there was a ball with a 'th' in superscript. I also used a very fancy Selectric with magnetic cards that you could program to do the dishes if you tried hard enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. IBM Composer was used for all tasks at the Pru Annuity area in 67
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 07:56 PM by papau
in Newark -if -

If you had a good title, you got "quality"

Proportional spacing was in my Sec workstations Composer typewriter in 69 - The $2500 Selectric had a Times Roman Ball - and Times Roman is defined as proportional - but that Selectric did not really do proportional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadamImAdam Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Better question: How did it print the "th"?
The superscript "th" in the CBS documents was raised half-way above the typed line (consistent with MS Word, but inconsistent with military typewriters which kept everything in-line to avoid writing outside the pre-printed boxes of standard forms).

See what I mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Wrong
It's obvious you didn't see tonight's CBS Evening News broadcast. If you had, you'd have seen them report that other military records released by the White House show the same superscript th. See www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/06/politics/main641481.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadamImAdam Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I did see it and the "th" was not raised like the TANG docs
That is my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. See post #20
Your efforts to discredit have fallen flat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
*points*

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. raised th was standard in most Selectric's in late 60's.
indeed on the same Guard Forms released by the WH, the th appears NOT raised on one line - and in another entry it appears raised - and the form was filled out in "1969"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadamImAdam Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Why didn't Rather use the raised example?
That is the simple question. TANG docs had it raised and Rather's example did not. Why didn't he use the proof if it's there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Again, you are using information from RW sites that is not CREDIBLE
do some REAL research and we might take you seriously!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadamImAdam Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I saw it with my own eyes
The "th" example "proving" the CBS assertion was not anything like the TANG docs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. See the Martin Heidt Feedom of Information Act data that he obtained
There is a boatload of proof there - from our government - that proves raised th and the lower th were used in the same office at the same time in 1969.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 08:04 PM by RationalRose
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fsbooks Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. the "executive" model had it
My father used one in the 60's. He was working under NOC for the government overseas. They also had paper ribbons to provide crisp type and so that the day's work could be removed and destroyed (everything else kept in the safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OilemFirchen Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The Executive was not a Selectric
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 08:00 PM by OilemFirchen
The Executive used a type bar, while the Selectrics used balls.

The Selectric could not do proportional fonts, IIRC. The Executive (and its predecessors) could, because the platen could move in increments of spaces - up to eight, again IIRC. I think the Selectrics could move half-spaces, but I may be wrong. Certainly no finer an increment.

Both the Selectrics and Executive could do sub and postscript. The Selectric could, theoretically, do such with a smaller pitch font if the typist changed balls. The Executive was a fixed-pitch machine, so any super or subscript would be the same pitch as the rest of the document.

That said, it's entirely possible that the Executive had specific keys for ligature characters (it obviously had 1/2, 1/4, etc.) and may have included th, nd, etc.

Moreso, the Executive type bar could be changed, though it was a more daunting task than changing a Selectric ball. I doubt that a secretary would go to the trouble unless it was a requirement. I've read about an attachment of sorts that could hold special characters, but I have my doubts.

I'll stick my neck out and say, conclusively, that the docs are genuine. And my vote goes to an Executive.

Sure do wish someone had one of the beasts and could put this nonsense to rest...




Eddimented fer speelink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I agree - I recall it as you have described - you bought special keys in
order to get special characters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. The Selectric Composer Does It All!
http://www.ibmcomposer.org/docs/Selectric%20Composer%20Operations%20Manual.pdf

The above instruction manual, which was set on the Selectric Composer, can do just about anything MS Word can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC