Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Assume the documents ARE Forgeries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 09:35 AM
Original message
Assume the documents ARE Forgeries
For a moment or three:

If the documents are forgeries, what previous allegations are destroyed?

ZERO.

If the documents are real, what new info do they prove?

1. Bush defied a direct order.

If he was given a direct order to report, wouldn't there be other documentation floating around somewhere to that effect?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. You'll notice that the White House IS USING the memo language...
to defend the shrub!

Yesterday's Press Gaggle transcript includes a footnote, citing the Killian memo which claims Bush* was "working with his commanders to comply with that order."

If the memo is a forgery, the White House's evidence disappears!

I have the transcript excerpt and the link on my blog:
http://ascrivenerslament.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
priller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your problem is you're thinking about this logically
The "documents are forgeries" thing has nothing to with logic, it's all about appearances and impressions. If THIS part of the AWOL story can be shown as ginned up, then ALL criticism about AWOL is discredited. And they don't even have to be conclusively shown as forgeries, they just need to muddy the waters enough to give people doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good Point, But
If that be the case, don't you think CBS is going to be doing some heavy investigating to find out why they were given fakes? Where do you think that's going to lead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Even you have drunk from the kool-aid, it seems
Only the authenticity of one of the documents has been questioned (and falsely, IMHO). The CYA memo that Killian kept in his own files.

The other documents are not in question. It's the other documents that prove he missed his physical and was suspended as a result.

So it's 'assume DOCUMENT is a forgery' not 'DOCUMENTS'.

That point has already been submerged by the impressive amount of bullshit the Bush machine excreted last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The only fools
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 10:17 AM by notsodumbhillbilly
are the ones who try to defend AWOL George. The documents were not "made up".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. it doesn't matter......we are playing right into their hands by repeating
the stupid story...hey guys...DU is supposed to be on the cutting edge...not the ass end.

They are imploding! Bush's goose will be cooked on Nov.2nd.

Dinner will be served!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC