|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:04 PM Original message |
If there are fewer to support social security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because the schools are being built where people live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. On second thought, is this question a joke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wurzel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. "Fewer to support SS" is a total red herring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stavka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. ...or if there wasn't such low a cap on maximum contribution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wurzel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:18 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That's the truth. There should be no cap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. the cap on Social Security is a slap in the face to the working poor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. The baby boom would have already been through the system by 1980 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Our population has stayed relatively static |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 10:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. But the population moves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 11:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Smaller class sizes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-26-04 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. So if the old schools are in disrepair should we not fix or rebuild? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC