Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I am not taking sides." --Baker on Iraq's use of chem weapons vs Kuwait

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 08:55 PM
Original message
"I am not taking sides." --Baker on Iraq's use of chem weapons vs Kuwait
"I am not taking sides." --Secretary of State James Baker offering an apparent rationalization for Iraq's use of chemical weapons against Kuwait.

...Iraq invaded Kuwait and George Bush readied for combat once again. He spewed a slew of tenuous rationales for the massive U.S. buildup, but as can be expected when George Bush is involved, there was more to the story than presented for public consumption. The earliest clues appeared on October 21, 1990, two and half months into the "Gulf Crisis," when the London Observer featured a special investigative report suggesting that Bush encouraged Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to attack Kuwait.

Earlier in the year, according to the Observer, Bush sent a secret envoy to meet with one of Saddam's top officials. The envoy told the dictator's confidant "that Iraq should engineer higher oil prices to get it out of its dire economic fix," wrote the English paper. The story appeared nowhere that I ever saw in the American media.

Saddam took the envoy's advice, moving his troops to the border of Kuwait. U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad April Glaspie told Saddam, "We don't have an opinion on inter-Arab border disputes such as your border dispute with Kuwait."

"The evidence suggests that U.S. complicity with Saddam went far beyond miscalculation of the Iraqi leader's inventions," wrote Observer reporter Helga Graham. The leaked documents on which she based her piece "have built up a picture of active support for the U.S. president."

Jonathan Vankin, Conspiracies, Cover-Ups and Crimes --From JFK to the Terrorist Connection (1992)

More here.

Lori Price
http://www.legitgov.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Baker is on top of the Slime heap--he is involved in every creepy
repuke maneuver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, James Baker is like John Milton in "The Devil's Advocate."
James BaKKKer was involved in the 2000 coup d'etat, as well.

Lori Price
http://www.legitgov.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He is in everything
His law firm is always putting the final touch on PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yup, James Baker, one of the princes of darkness
If there's a buck (or more likely, millions of bucks) to be made, you'll find James Baker's smarmy little face peeking out from under the stack of ill-gotten loot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, Baker is among my 'most detested' in the Bush dictatorship...
Edited on Sun Aug-22-04 11:16 PM by Lori Price CLG
...but it's 'like a twenty-way tie.'

:)-Lori Price
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLabSoldier Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have seen pictures
In a US Army MEDDAC book on chemical munitions from Iraq. It was of Iraqi soldiers who accidently hit themselves with mustard gas. This is a blister agent, and these men look like they had been peeled. I am personally against nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, but mainly because they scare the crap out of me......I have done the chemical training, and while we have the best chemical suits and masks available, they are uncomfortable, constricting, and hard to see out of. The thought of a chemical war frightens me. Its a good thing that chemical munitions of all sorts are not very effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC