Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who was the less effective president, Bush SR or Bush JR ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:51 PM
Original message
Who was the less effective president, Bush SR or Bush JR ?
I actually thought Bush Sr should have gotten more of the credit for the Berlin Wall and Soviet Empire crumbling, rather than Reagan. Because it was on his watch - not Reagan's. In truth, neither deserves any huge amount of credit. However, when Bush SR attacked Iraq, Soviet weapons were the weapons that were defeated by the US and allies, to a large extent. The Soviet Union collapsed soon thereafter. Also, Bush SR had enough sense to see that the deficits were smothering our economy and had the courage to do something about it, even though most now say it lost him the election.

Bush JR, on the other hand, has done everything differently than his Poppy. He has rushed headlong into an unnecessary war without adequate troops or adequate planning and under false pretenses. By all rights, he should have been impeached. This was after he went on vacation and forgot to read the intelligence warnings about al Qaeda and permitted our country to be attacked. Although he is praised by the right-wing evangelicals, it is not because of his policies, it is because of his perceived faith. Even there, he cusses those mother fuckers when they don't treat him right.

So, I don't think there is any comparison. I think Bush SR is much less offensive than the Shrub Jr.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Danger Duck Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Effective or offensive?
* is by far the more effective President in recent history. He has effectively ruined our standing in the world, our economy, and our military. Pretty damn effective and offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lizzie Borden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Depends...
on how you define effective. If the term is defined as getting his agenda across, then it's W. If it's who did the least harm to the country and world, the it's Poppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. That's what I would have asked
I think effective is defined as to which degree a certain goal is reached, so the answer depends on which goal one takes into account.

Bush was very effective in selling a war, in making the rich richer, and so on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghetto_Boy Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. poppy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Four words come to mind
Edited on Sun Aug-22-04 02:57 PM by ih8thegop
Americans with Disbilities Act.

I doubt Dubya would sign that.

Plus, Poppy fought a war that resulted in the deaths of 140 Americans. Dubya's war has resulted in nearly seven times that number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. If effective means trying to do the right thing, then Bush Sr.
If effective means affecting a change that is either good or bad, Bush Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCdem87 Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. I disagree...
while shrub jr.'s offensive policy is more apparent to us now, his father was still very much a bad president. Personally i don't like anyone from that family in politics because they all care nothing about the American people (at least not the ones who aren't involved in oil or money by the millions of barrels or millions of dollars respectively). They are all dangerous to the welfare of this country. Its just the blistering sore of the bushies and their policy has finally taken a head in chimpy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Poppy in the Middle of Everything

People think that Poppy is so innocent.
Not me.


When he was President hed presented himself as intelligent and middle of the road.

There is no one knows the ins and outs of this government like Poppy.
He us calling all the shots,IMO, for Rove etc.

Remember that Condi was POPPY's good friend. Therefore, she follows Poppy's orders when feeding garbage into the Chimp.

Colin was hand picked by Poppy and so was Clarence Thomas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoiBoy Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. This post says it all, IMO...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=1696082&mesg_id=1696082&page=


<snip>
Speaking of conspiracies ... ONE name at the heart of all these
Nor, finally, is it in any way a "theory" that the one, single name that can be directly linked to the Third Reich, the US military industrial complex, Skull and Bones, Eastern Establishment good ol' boys, the Illuminati, Big Texas Oil, the Bay of Pigs, the Miami Cubans, the Mafia, the FBI, the JFK assassination, the New World Order, Watergate, the Republican National Committee, Eastern European fascists, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the United Nations, CIA headquarters, the October Surprise, the Iran/Contra scandal, Inslaw, the Christic Institute, Manuel Noriega, drug-running "freedom fighters" and death squads, Iraqgate, Saddam Hussein, weapons of mass destruction, the blood of innocents, the savings and loan crash, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, the "Octopus," the "Enterprise," the Afghan mujaheddin, the War on Drugs, Mena (Arkansas), Whitewater, Sun Myung Moon, the Carlyle Group, Osama bin Laden and the Saudi royal family, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, and the presidency and vice-presidency of the United States, is: George Herbert Walker Bush.
<end>

W is just a front... the faces behind the front all belong to Poppy (Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, et al...)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes,yes,yes!!! Poppy is right in the middle of everything!!!

I totally agree with you!

I even read a thread here that suggested that Poppy could have been Deep Throat.

It really caused me to think about that possibility and since the first time it was mentioned, I have seen nothing that changes my mind.

That is what is so dangerous about this administration. If Kerry beats Bush,Poppy will still have his fingers in the pie. He has placed a lot of people that will owe him big time - Porter Goss for example.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-22-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sr. was the stealth prez
It was his one world order that spawned the trade treaties, starting with GATT
He injected the US into MidEast turmoil with US troops, setting the bar so all future incursions could be expected.

As far as the crumbling of the Soviet Empire, I strongly believe that the Cold War bankrupted them.

The Cold War has also bankrupted us - it is just that our solution is to preserve the wealthy class and throw the rest overboard.

The Cold War was a costly war in terms of money spent, resources utilized, the spreading of cancer from nuclear testing and the growth of the defense contractors and their powers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. More proof that Poppy is ALWAYS in the middle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. No doubt about it...W is extremely effective.
Much more effective than his father. That's the problem.

W got a lot of mileage out of 9/11. I believe that without it, his agenda would have met resistance in the congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. George the First was an ineffectual wimp
His only "accomplishment" was staying the hell out of the way while his surrogates waged a dubious "war."

George the Lesser, however, has killed thousands and quite effectively destroyed the US economy, our reputation in the world, our relationships with our allies, the air, the water, the national parks, healthcare (which was already hurting pre-bushgang), the Constitution/Bill of Rights, and several acres of prime Manhattan real estate.

"Effective" is a neutral term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Poppy was busy doing lots of other things


that have paved the way for this administration to spin its web around us.

He may have looked like he was sitting back but what a busy bee he really has been for all these years.

What in the hell was he meeting with Cheney for the evening before 911? If you go back and really review all the hints that MM gave us in F 911, he all but said Poppy has more power than we know.

IMO MM just didn't have the time to focus on Poppy more,but Poppy was doing his dirty work with oil and everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. Damn, it's a toss-up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Not to me


GW is not really President so how could he be effective?

If we are talking about his administration,that is different.
Cheney and Poppy and Rove are really doing the work.

GW is far too stupid to hold down a job. He is a totsl idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sr. less effective-Jr. is just destructive
Sr. has a bit of an excuse-he couldn't try to reverse the unsound policies of Reagan. They were still basking in the glow of Ronnie's tenure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC