Title: IOC prevents athletes from reporting on experiences through weblogs
ATHENS (AP) - The International Olympic Committee (news - web sites) is barring competitors, as well as coaches, support personnel and other officials, from writing firsthand accounts for news and other websites.
An exception is if an athlete has a personal website that they did not set up specifically for the Games.
The IOC (news - web sites)'s rationale for the restriction is that athletes and their coaches should not serve as journalists -and that the interests of broadcast rightsholders and accredited media come first.
Participants in the Games may respond to written questions from reporters or participate in online chat sessions -akin to a face-to-face or telephone interview -but they may not post journals or online diaries, blogs in Internet parlance, until the Games end Aug. 29.
more...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/cpress/20040820/ca_pr_on_tc/oly_athletes_reporting_1~~~~~~~~~~
Are Olympic athletes now considered "employees"? What I'm seeing here over a century or so, is that first "speech" is ruled as "money", and those with more money get larger megaphones--fast forward to the present--now, "big money" is "controlling the speech of individuals".
Is this now an expansion beyond the right of an employer to curb a employee's speech? If so, who's next?