Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi & O'Reilly: "safer than we were on 9/11 but we’re not yet safe"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 11:36 AM
Original message
Condi & O'Reilly: "safer than we were on 9/11 but we’re not yet safe"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,127847,00.html



CONDOLEEZZA RICE, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER: Well, Americans should know that, as the president has said many times, the Al Qaeda network has been hurt, but not hurt badly enough to the point that they can’t attack again. This country is safer than we were on 9/11 but we’re not yet safe.

And there is no doubt that we have been receiving over the last really several weeks a lot of information that Al Qaeda might try and make an attack prior to the U.S. election. That information had been out before.

But what happened over the last few days is that that information has become more specific as to place and that is why Tom Ridge felt it necessary yesterday to go out and talk about rather the specific targets in New York and in New Jersey and in Washington, D.C.

snip

RICE: Well, Bill, I believe that Americans understand that anything worth doing is sometimes difficult. And it requires sacrifice. But this president is not one who just, when the going gets tough, decides that, well, we’re just going to give up. What we’re going to do is we’re going to stay the course. Iraqis every day are taking more and more responsibilities. They have a good interim government in place. They’re moving toward elections. This Iraqi government will hold elections. And the American people will have a good democratic partner in Iraq that will be stable and that will not be threat to this region. Because after all, to have Saddam Hussein, this terrible tyrant who used weapons of mass destruction, cavorted with terrorists, we’d gone to war against him before, that was a threat that you could not leave; the most dangerous man in the middle of the world’s most dangerous region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kissy Kissy


What a bitch. She can lie with real words vs. Bush who can not make a complete sentence.

That is why she is so dangerous.

The will both look wonderful at the Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. What Bugs Me about This
We cannot be safer if we are not safe. It just does not make sense in the American language. We must be safe in order to be safer. Therefore, if we are not safe we are not safer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I Keep Hearing "Safer"...Safer Than What?
Safer than last week, last month, a year ago? Surely we're not safer in this country than we were prior to 12/1/2000...and we're sure not getting safer with Bunnypants as a walking recruitment poster for all sorts of terrorist groups. This double-speak has gotta stop.

Yep, there's a major threat to our national security...we even isolated it to where they could attack...which just happens to be where we're holding our big drinkie-drinkie party and don't want no long-haired librul commies messing things up...it is so dangerous we had to raise the terror alert to Ernie Orange...but that's ok, brave Mrs. Pickles Stepford walked bravely right into one of those targets...sheesh. Safer? I feel a lot safer when I'm watching them in the dock in the Hague, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's the Chewbacca Defense!
Edited on Tue Aug-03-04 12:44 PM by Walt Starr
OH NO, THEY ARE USING THE CHEWBACCA DEFENSE!!!

"Ladies and gentlemen of the supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider: (pulling down a diagram of Chewie) this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk, but Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now, think about that. That does not make sense! (jury looks shocked)

Why would a Wookiee -- an eight foot tall Wookiee -- want to live on Endor with a bunch of two foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense!

But more importantly, you have to ask yourself: what does that have to do with this case? (calmly) Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense!

Look at me, I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca. Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense. None of this makes sense.

And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberating and conjugating the Emancipation Proclamation... does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense.

If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Of course. It makes perfect sense............. Here's exhibit A:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cavorting with terrorists?!?
Well, I hope he had a good time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC