Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
defoliate_bush Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:30 PM
Original message
Gay rights
Don't get me wrong. I am %100 behind marriage rights. Hell, I'm a lesbian! However, I don't think this is the time for the Democratic Party to be crusading for gay marriage. I know that if Democrats show strong support for it now, Kerry/Edwards will be at a HUGE disadvantage. If we have another four years of this Bush regime, gays and lesbians will NEVER have rights. Right now we need to stick to the real issues-the economy, the war, etc. What do you guys think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats still should be AGAINST the GOP's constitutional amendment
Edited on Mon Jul-12-04 07:33 PM by David Dunham
I agree this is not the time for Dems to push gay marriage, but Dems should still oppose Bush's contitutional amendment, which would ban gay marriage permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed.
I'm not expecting the Democrats to become champions for the cause however I very much expect them to be against amending the constitution to explicitly DENY rights to people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defoliate_bush Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Of course
It's pretty certain that this amendment won't pass anyway. I just think that it should be kept subtle. I correct myself about the "crusading" part, though. Very few dems actually support gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
put out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I do. So does my mate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dem party did not crusade for gay marriage.
This is strictly being brought up by the GOP as a wedge issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Democrats are not actually crusading for this.
The repukes are trying to use it as a wedge issue.

I don't think there is ever a bad time to crusade for peoples' rights.

But Kerry and Edwards are not actually doing that.

It is the same for African Americans. They were always told to wait, to go slow. I did not agree with that either.

But I don't think this election will hinge on gay rights, either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excellent Response, Murielm99.
Couldn't possibly have said it better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Well said, and succinct.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cardlaw Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I say
just force a cloture vote. Fend of Repub crap about not allowing a vote by noting that amending the Constitution requires 67 votes, a cloture vote requires only 60. If they can't get 60 votes, they sure as hell can't get 67.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. the Dems will allow a vote on Wednesday...
but the ammendment will never pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Gay Marriage issue and Republicans
Whatever happened to States rights?

I thought Republicans were for limited Federal
Government and States Rights!

This is an issue that should be left to the
States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. States Rights? Ha!

Tell that to the medical marijuana patients here in CA who've had their doors kicked down by Asscroft's DEA. States rights only apply when we're dealing with the state's right to be fascist or asinine. States do not have the right to be any more liberal than the dumbest right-wing hick common denominator. Welcome to America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Hi phillysuse!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. How about pointing out
that gays and lesbians have been getting married for months in California and a few other places and the sky hasn't fallen, men haven't deserted their wives and kiddies to go searching for the men of their dreams, and nobody who isn't sitting out in a thunderstorm hasn't been hit by lightning?

That should do it. It's a big ho-hum and I think even fundies have more pressing issues.

I don't think we have to do anything but point out the obvious. No crusading for gay marriage is needed. It's an idea whose time has come. Let the right expend time and energy shrieking against it.

What else have they got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westsidexview Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. yes
to play the cultural wars game card has one effect: to have people who should vote democrat instead vote republican. republicans are so sexually repressed. why should they be so concerned with other people's sex lives? whatever peeping tom tendencies freepers have, don't give them the issue to exploit the republican-duped voting cattle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. I agree. This was handed to the GOP on a platter by Massachusetts.
And they have run with it. Gays may not realize it, since I think they mainly live in communities and cities that are more accepting of homosexuality, but polls have shown that majority of Americans want marriage to remain between a man and a woman, although they're okay with civil unions for gays.

I don't know how many votes the GOP will get or solidify with this issue, but they'll get some. And it may make a difference in what will probably be a very close race.

A safer, better national strategy would have been to let things lie low until after the election, and then pursue the issue through the states and courts, or force President Kerry to deal with it. Democrats are much more sympathetic on this issue. And Kerry doesn't think this is a federal issue.

But I don't think there's a national strategy. If * wins, there will definitely be a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. If it doesn't pass this time, it will eventually. And the Repubs are like pit bulls - they don't give up on bills that speak to their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. What?!? "Gays" mainly live in communities that are accepting?
That's quite a general statement to make. In fact, "gays" (fyi "gay people" would be a bit more polite term to use) live everywhere you straight people do.

It isn't about LETTING things lie low... it's about this being shoved down our throats as an issue by the GOP. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nothing but FLAMEBAIT. Hope DU can see through it.
Crusading for gay marriage? Who's doing that? Name someone - anyone. And then we'll discuss.

Hmm, something's rotten in Demark here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Thank you for pointing that out! It is a bit smelly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xocolatl Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Agreed (also gay here) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aunt Anti-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. I would have to say you are right.
I wish now that his position on gay rights is 'out' (forgive the pun) I think he should put it on the backburner just simply to gather together other supporters to be able to win the election. However, I don't think it will hurt him to keep it up, either. If you think about it there aren't too many people left who don't have a loved one or a friend who is gay. A lot of straight people like me who believe in straight-marriage also believe our gay relatives and friends should enjoy the same legal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. This flamebait issue has been done to death here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC