Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashcroft faces whistleblower secrets probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:24 AM
Original message
Ashcroft faces whistleblower secrets probe
ASHCROFT faces whistleblower secrets probe
United Press International - USA

This has probably been posted but I hadn't seen it here.
Ashcroft has been taking some heat lately. :-)

<http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040627-030547-4386r>

By Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor
Published 6/27/2004 10:10 PM


WASHINGTON, June 27 (UPI) -- The federal government's secrecy watchdog is conducting an inquiry into whether Attorney General John Ashcroft acted properly in classifying information relating to a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower from the FBI's translation unit.

Sibel Edmonds, a contract translator who blew the whistle on mismanagement, inefficiency and serious security problems, is suing the Department of Justice for violating her First Amendment rights by quashing her claims against the FBI with the rarely invoked "state-secrets privilege."

Her case relates to the way the translation unit in the bureau's Washington field office was run immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks. Edmonds has made shocking allegations about incompetence, lax internal security and deliberate efforts to frustrate the unit's work -- some of which have been acknowledged to be true by the FBI.

<snip>
Secrecy experts say the affair appears to be part of a pattern of behavior by the Bush administration: the abuse of classification procedures to stifle public debate about politically sensitive aspects of the war against terrorism.


WATCHDOG probes Ashcroft moves
Washington Times - Washington,DC,USA

<http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040628-123410-8862r.htm>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. The one and only thing Ashcroft has
is audacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. sounds Josh Marshally tectonic to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let the eeeeaaagle sooooooaaarrr!!!! Like she's never
soarn (?) befooooooorrreeee!

Pardon me, I just had a flashback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. What a voice
Best for all of us if in fact he does quit his day job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slit Skirt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. it's good to see this story is finally ...
getting some mainstream coverage...she needs the media on her side..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I have "Sibel Edmonds" on google news alert
anytime her name appears in a story it is emailed to me. This was the latest. Her name is coming more often, which is definately a good sign in itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. He got away with contempt
of congress, why should this be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Daniel Ellsberg says Ashcroft may do time over this cover-up.
http://www.breakfornews.com/Sibel-Edmonds1.htm
(link for Ellsberg statement)

The same site has a LOT of good background on this legal case:
http://www.BreakForNews.com/Sibel-Edmonds.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC