|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
MiltonLeBerle (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:31 PM Original message |
Why a Flat-tax isn't "fair". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. but is it "balanced"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kamika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. well i agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wise man once told me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. And watch carefully what's being taxed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. Slight adjustment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. That works for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. I agree - a per person deductible of $7500 makes it work fairly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybylla (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I have always supported a flat tax with a floor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:38 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. The problem is that you don't collect enough tax to fund the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Not so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. The real problem is there aren't enough evil rich people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiltonLeBerle (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. As long as the floor is adequate- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SavageWombat (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'll play devil's advocate here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. This is Milton Friedman's negative income tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
8. fines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cprise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
12. Reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kamika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
15. How would this work as a flat tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. It depends on what the definition of "isn't" isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jiacinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
19. It isn't fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Deductions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The mortgage interest deduction is corporate welfare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiltonLeBerle (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:54 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Mortgage interest deduction on primary residence only- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Classic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-15-03 03:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Middle-class entitlement and corporate welfare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC