Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you a Bigot??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:36 AM
Original message
Are you a Bigot??
I hear lots of bigoted comments on hear about the Military.

I think it is narrow minded of someone to say that they are against someone serving office because of having served in the military.

How is this any different than saying someone should not serve in an office because they are a women, or are not white?

There have been 8 Generals that served as President, from the worst, as Grant, to the best as Washington.

Every President, except Clinton, has served in uniform.

I am trying to think why someone would be opposed to someone who had once held the title of General would be a bad president.

Is it because they think a General would go to war because they love war?

Is it because they think they are stupid and have no brains and can't use thought to get through a problem?

Is it because they think they would declare marshall law and ignore the consititution?

When was the last time a war started under a former General that was President?

None of these stereotypes by narrow minded bigots apply to Wesley Clark.
Clark hates war, he has been in it. Clark does not just think in military terms. He has done more, much more than be a general. He has more education and brains in his pinky than Bush has in his entire body. Clark is a genius, he is a best selling author, a debator, a stratigist, he has three degrees from Oxford, he founded leadership for American, he worked in the White House writting the US budget.
He has build diplomatic relationships with over 50 countries.
The only thing this man has not done is run for office.

Instead, people are saying what we need is career politicans, trial lawyers, and CEO's as our leaders. These are the people that got us into this mess. These are people that robbed the stock market, our health insurance, our schools, and passed the corrupt laws that we have today.

Clark is an American, his loyality is for the common person, the person on street, the person that works everyday, the person that has nothing and had to work for a living, and the persons that care about the overall welfare of the people in country.
Clark is not about special interests, or about rigging the laws to serve them. He is about working for the average Joe and Jane on the street. He hasn't been taking donations for Enron, Shell, and McDonalds.

If you can't look past the title of General and look at man himself, Wesley, the individual, then you are no better than the people that wouldn't look at Black man, a Hispanic Man, or Women for an office. You are no better than the people that lump all Blacks, Gays, Hispanics, or Jews into one group. You are sterotyping and profiling based ONE characteristic, not the person as a whole.
What you are is a Bigot.

:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. If I were a bigot-
I wouldn't be pulling for Bill Richardson to have a spot on the 2004 ticket.

other than that, you're preaching to the choir in me.

Wesley Clark/Bill Richardson in 2004
That's the ticket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, bullshit.
And that's the second time you have made a blatently incorrect statement:

"Every President, except Clinton, has served in uniform."

Not true. Better do your homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti_shrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Do we need to mention Shrubbie?
He had a uniform, but never bothered to show up to wear it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Lincoln has not been in uniform AFAIK
prove that he was in the military. That is easier than proving he wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. John Adams served in the Military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. yes hes was.
during the blackhawk wars of 1832...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Lincoln served as a Captain of Militia during the Black Hawk War.
For that reason, I left him off my list. See below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Militias and Reserves form a grey area to me
Also doing a several year term in the military, ala JFK, isn't quite the same as making a career out of it. You don't become a General in a 5 year term, it takes a lot of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
53. So punish people for success?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #53
59. which is success, staying in or leaving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't recall John Adams being in the Military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
48. You old enough to remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. When did FDR serve in the military? I never heard of him being in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Technically, FDR was Asst Sec Nav
or some such similar post during WWI... but how 'bout Jefferson?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. That is not a military position, it is a cabinet position
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Right, but
the original post specified "in uniform" so to be completely, technically accurate, I'd give him credit for a military position... just like Raygun, who served in uniform by making training films in H'wood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Dubious at best
Cabinet positions just aren't military. The Surgeon General is technically a general, but we all know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Absolutely
but the argument was so weak that I figured a little extra leeway was in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. I don't think we should handicap ourselves when given a bullshit argument
Anyway, he said all but 1 and we showed another and that is all it takes for his argument to be revealed as a hideous and heinous lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. That's the attitude I'd expect from
a Klinkite...

DRAFT SHULTZ!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. But Schultz is an incompetent boob!
Edited on Thu Aug-14-03 01:26 AM by JVS
Klink all the way!

You certainly have your eyes on the different areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Of course he is
Which is why he's perfect- would make the transition from * all that much smoother~
And yeah, I get around :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
45. No, assistant Secretary is not, Secretary was-Still in the Military
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Did FDR do basic training?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. They served in the British Army, US didn't exist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. One could choose not to count that as serving this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Yes, but it was made up for by writing the Consititution, don't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Actually there are more then one...
Instead of panting after Supreme Commander Wesley, perhaps you ought to do your research.

Start with Adams, Jefferson, Madison...

Or how about Taft, Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover...

http://www.magweb.com/sample/wl020pre.htm

Now...go do your homework...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiltonLeBerle Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Taft thru FDR is a long run of non-military presidents.
1909-1945
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
47. Taft was Sectretary of War
FDR, Assistant secretary of the Navy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Secretary of war is now Secretary of Defense, so if Taft was military
Edited on Thu Aug-14-03 01:42 AM by JVS
then Rumsfeld is no longer a chicken-hawk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. State Militias
Are not listed. Just US service. State Militias were not listed as Federal Service.

:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. That's right...you quibble just like...
your (non) candidate!

No wonder you like him so much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. Sfecap when Dean loses
I am going to rub it in your nose, every time you come on here. Over and over again. And am I ever going to enjoy it so much!

:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. LOL...
BTW...am I still a liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Yes and
Edited on Thu Aug-14-03 02:02 AM by VoteClark
a loser, backing a person bent on detroying the party for his own personal gain.

Every president served a military. In the Milita, or the British Army, or the US Army, or in an appointed officer postion. Except Clinton.

I am sure you can make an argument that the state Milita doesn't count. But it does.

:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Gee...how sad.
Even when confronted with data proving otherwise, you continue to make false assertions.

I'll bet that the General would acknowledge his mistake and move on with a certain amount of dignity intact.

BTW...you are getting a bit personal here. Be careful or another one of your vitriolic posts will get removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. Come back tomorrow with the list of all presidents and their
military units. Then you will have proven your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #55
61. Are you a bigot, you seem intent on showing military service as ..
pre-requisite for being a president. That too is bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. John Adams. Did not serve in uniform. And neither did:
Thomas Jefferson.
James Madison.
James Monroe.
John Quincy Adams.
Martin Van Buren.
Millard Fillmore.
James Buchanan.
Andrew Johnson.
Chester A. Arthur.
William H. Taft.
Woodrow Wilson.
Calvin Coolidge.
Warren Harding.
Herbert Hoover.
Franklin D. Roosevelt.

And that's just off the top of my head. Want proof? Look up their bios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. OK...


John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
John Q. Adams
Martin Van Buren
James K. Polk
Franklin Pierce
Grover Cleveland
William H. Taft
Woodrow Wilson
Warren G. Harding
Calvin Coolidge
Herbert Hoover
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. Pierce was in the Mexican War
His commanding General was Winfield Scott
FDR was Secretary of the Navy
John Adams and Jefferson served in the British Army
Have to do somemore research on the others. But I know at least two of them served in the State Militia, which doesn't count as US Service

:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. A reading of an online Hoover biography shows no military service
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Disagree!
I think General Clark's huge asset is the General title.

But to say that someone doesn't like him because he is a General is like racism, or sexism is a bit over the top. Being a General is his occupation. Just like if someone would not like to see a porn star, trial lawyer, or big tobacco CEO in office they are against the occupation a chosen path. Not to say Porn star= General but the idea that you don't like someones job is not I don't like women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. You're comparing a job title to race and gender
Not logical at all. But I have nothing against anyone in the military. My Father and brother have been in the military and so is the person I am now dating.

If anyone said they would never vote for a military person that is there right. I think very few members actually think that--and that is their right.

My problem with Clark is I always thought he was a republican. Even his supporters did not seem sure for a while there what his party was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VoteClark Donating Member (775 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. A pro-gay, pro-abortion, pro-affirmative action Republican?
Humm, seems unlikely, very unlikely. I know many Republicans that like him. But I don't know of many that think he is a Republican. And I have talked to enough of the Draft Wesley Clark members to know they don't think that.

:kick:
J4Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfecap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Then what is his party?
And why won't he simply state it?

Why the big secret?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. so
where's the "mea culpa" about all presidents serving in the military?

You were awfully smug about your "knowledge".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Also, the last time a war started under a President/General
VietNam. Started under Eisenhower, ramped up under Kennedy and then Johnson totally screwed the pooch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. Started under Truman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Truman sent, like, 30 "advisors", true.
But direct US assistance, training by "advisors" began in '54-55, after Dien Bien Phu.

1955 January - United States begins direct assistance to the government of Vietnam
1955 February - U.S. military advisors start training South Vietnamese military
http://mil.citrus.cc.ca.us/cat2courses/HIST155/Briefings/BRIEF3.HTM

http://mil.citrus.cc.ca.us/cat2courses/HIST155/BigtimelineVWar.htm
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/mission.htm
http://www.deanza.edu/faculty/swensson/vnhist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roughsatori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. so you know his party affiliation?
then why don't you tell him! (It is "pro-choice." "Pro-abortion" is what Freepers call it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
31. Apologize for your lie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
58. I know, maybe that is why Arnold is a democrat?
wait a minute, he's a republican!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
28. I'm bigoted against plumbers, especially if they have that crack problem..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. Ah, si...
Clinton was probably the closest we've had to a plumber president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
38. Yes
Those military participating in the current conflict in the nation of Iraq are participants in an illegal war, and are, therefore, subject to war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf_Moderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-03 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
56. A voice in the wilderness..
I grow weary of the pervasive anti-military mindset I'm picking up from some. I'm glad someone pointed out that being a soldier doesn't make you any less Presidential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC