Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reagan's biggest legacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ringmastery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 04:12 PM
Original message
Reagan's biggest legacy
Of course the republican hack who wrote this thinks it's all great. We know better.

In 1981, when the nation's air-traffic controllers threatened to do what the law forbade them to do—strike—Reagan warned that if they did they would be fired. When they struck in August, Reagan announced that the strikers would be terminated in two days. By firing the controllers, Reagan, the only union man—he had been head of the Screen Actors Guild—ever to be president, destroyed a union, the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO). This has often, and not incorrectly, been called a defining episode of the Reagan presidency because it notified foreign leaders, not least those of the Soviet Union, that he said what he meant and meant what he said.

But now, more than two astonishing decades on, it also is reasonable to conclude that Reagan's fracas with the controllers had huge economic consequences, domestic and foreign. It altered basic attitudes about relations between business and labor in ways that quickly redounded to the benefit of the nation, and not least the benefit of American workers. It produced a cultural shift, a new sense of what can be appropriate in business management: layoffs can be justifiable even when a company is profitable, if the layoffs will improve productivity and profitability. Within a few years, both AT&T and Procter Gamble, although quite profitable at the time, implemented large layoffs, without arousing significant protests.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5146340/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Newsweek = Newsmax
That's right, the two are no different.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pollock Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reagan wanted to let unions know
that management could do anything to ruin the life of working America; most people in the country were now expendable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reagan's greatest legacy......Bush
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 04:25 PM by buycitgo
via bringing the Bernays/Goebbels propaganda model into the 21st century

Deaver and his acolytes have brought us the current junta

read the book, after these snips:

"The whole thing was PR. This was a PR outfit that became President and took over the country. And to the degree then to which the Constitution forced them to do things like make a budget, run foreign policy and all that, they sort of did. But their first, last, and overarching activity was public relations."

Leslie Janka, a deputy White House press secretary under Reagan


......

James Baker, White House chief of staff during the first term and Secretary of the Treasury during the second, told me, "There were days and times and events we might have some complaint about, on balance and generally speaking, I don't think we had anything to complain about in terms of first-term press coverage. "

David Gergen, former White House director of communications, confirmed shortly after leaving the administration in January 1984 that President Reagan and most of his advisers had come to believe that the basic goal of their approach to the news media-"to correct the imbalance of power with the press so that the White House will once again achieve a 'margin of safety' "- had finally been attained.

Most expansive of all was Michael Deaver, the first-term deputy chief of staff and a virtual surrogate son to the Reagans. Deaver wrote in his memoirs that up until the Iran-contra scandal broke, "Ronald Reagan enjoyed the most generous treatment by the press of any President in the postwar era. He knew it, and liked the distinction."


wonder why Hertsgaard isn't on any of these hagio-circuses
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Ronald_Reagan/On_Bended_Knee.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. I've always thought it was trashing "Fairness in Broadcasting"
E.G.: it used to be the law of the land that the people owned the airwaves and any opinion could be expressed but equal time for differing opinions were required: Reagan ended that and opened the door for Bushbots like Hannity, Rush and O'Reilly.

Anyone agree with me?

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-06-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Out to lunch
Edited on Sun Jun-06-04 04:51 PM by wtmusic
PATCO's members were forbidden to strike, and they did anyway. They got fired. That the PATCO strike "altered basic attitudes about relations between business and labor" is a wholly fictitious invention of the writer.

Massive layoffs were common throughout the seventies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC