Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

D-Day Overkill, and Ronald Reagan are Intertwined......read...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:06 AM
Original message
D-Day Overkill, and Ronald Reagan are Intertwined......read...
Edited on Sat Jun-05-04 11:07 AM by mopaul
http://slate.msn.com/id/2101752/

Under Ronald Reagan, however, the mood changed. It was Reagan who kicked off the D-Day mania when, in 1984, equipped with a backdrop chosen by Michael Deaver and a speech penned by Peggy Noonan, he lauded a band of aging U.S. Army Rangers in front of the very 130-foot rock face they had scaled with fire department grappling hooks and ladders 40 years before. Reagan spoke for a constituency that wanted to reclaim America's pride in its military strength. His farewell address in 1988 called for the revival of a feel-good history that would teach schoolchildren "who Jimmy Doolittle was, and what those thirty seconds over Tokyo meant." If this rhetoric sounded fuzzy and nostalgic, it shouldn't have been surprising, since Reagan's vision of war came from Hollywood, where he had discharged his own service obligations as part of the First Motion Picture Unit of the Army Air Corps. (At times Reagan even confused the real war with memories of films he acted in or watched, as when he "remembered" having liberated the Nazi camps.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. amazing link we have two repug "war time presidents" both of
which dodged the draft and then acted as if they were war heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think this hoopla is disrespectful to the soldiers in Iraq.
Yes, of course, we all want to honor the WWII vets for their time served. And they are dying off quickly. However, this seems to be never-ending. Every week there is something on the History Channel or Discovery about these brave fighters. Yet I never see Vietnam vets interviewed by Brokaw. And while many men and women are fighting and being horribly maimed or killed this very day in a foreign war they probably don't understand anymore since they have to know the WMD's was bullshit by now...

It is flat out wrong to make heros out of certain soldiers, and not others. And oh yeah, what about the Rosy Riveters and female pilots who made it all possible for the men to do their job?

And they complain it took so long to get their memorial! Well, hell, you guys only got your high-paying jobs back from the women who had them. You only got the GI bill. You only got affordable housing and oh, the parades and booze and women! Woo-hoo. The Vietnam vets didn't get shit, not even health care for agent orange poisoning. That's why they got a memorial!!!!!

No offense to the old guys, but enough already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. bush mentioned every war EXCEPT vietnam in his mem. day speech
he tried very hard to associate world war 2 with his wars, and mentioned every damn war we ever had, but not one mention of vietnam. the one he dodged, and the one we didn't win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You're kidding.
58,000 soldiers died in that fiasco and he didn't even bother to mention their sacrifice on Memorial Day??!!!

:nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke:

Ripley's gone ballistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. and one that bush supported
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-05-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. However, Bitburgmania wasn't nearly as successful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC