Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Dismisses Two Nichols Jurors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:32 PM
Original message
Judge Dismisses Two Nichols Jurors
Judge Dismisses Two Nichols Jurors
By TIM TALLEY, Associated Press Writer
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040602/ap_on_re_us/nichols_trial_13



McALESTER, Okla. - Two members of the jury considering sentencing for Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols were dismissed by the judge Wednesday and were replaced by the last two remaining alternate jurors.

Judge Steven Taylor did not explain what the two jurors did wrong, but he strongly told the rest of the panel not to discuss the case outside of regular jury deliberations.

"Do not discuss sentencing," Taylor said following a one-hour closed meeting with prosecution and defense attorneys. "Do not allow anyone to discuss it with you."

One of the jurors dismissed Wednesday was the jury foreman.

*SNIP*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. What happens if there's a mistrial in the sentencing phase?
They would just have to lose one more juror for that to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was wondering the same thing myself. I wonder what...
...happened with those two jurors. I'm sure the jurors are under one heck of a lot of pressure; I wouldn't want to be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. According to one of the talking heads, the sentencing phase
would then be left up to the judge to decide, not the jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'd hate to be that Judge... n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Unconstitutional
The Supreme Court said that wasn't acceptable, has to be a jury. I'd think there'd be a mistrial and new trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Just the penalty phase, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Any idea what the deal is with the Jury? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libcurious Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder
what ever happened to the 11 security camera's that caught everything but were confiscated by the FBI and not allowed to be shown at the trials?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the FBI lists 23 tapes in evidence; the Secret Service log...
...discusses one of them. I think it is from the camera on the SW Bell building. I don't know why the official position is that there are no tapes when two different services talk about them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd like to volunteer to be on the jury that puts that a-hole to death
like he belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, here's the thing:
This actually doesn't have anything to do with the jury members being dismissed, but, if the death penalty is in effect in OK, and Nichols has been convicted, why would they NOT give him the death penalty? If killing 169 people doesn't get you a lethal injection, what would? This seems like it should be a slam dunk, I'm wondering why the jury is out for more than an hour deciding this. Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The Jury must have had some concerns about the evidence...
...is all I can figure. A lot of the government's case had a bad smell to it.




Archived Stories at:
http://news.yahoo.com/fc?tmpl=fc&cid=34&in=us&cat=oklahoma_city_bombing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Videos of explosion - Any lawyers here who know why the...
...government wasn't forced to produce the videos that the FBI lists in inventory and the Secret Service references?

If the government can just say there are no tapes and it is let go at that...why didn't Nixon just destroy his tape? :)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC