Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IIS group says there is 18K al queda is same group who said Iraq had WMDS.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 09:49 AM
Original message
IIS group says there is 18K al queda is same group who said Iraq had WMDS.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040526/ap_on_re_mi_ea/al_qaida&cid=540&ncid=716


Al-Qaida is probably working on plans for major attacks on the United States and Europe, and it may be seeking weapons of mass destruction in its desire to inflict as many casualties as possible, the International Institute of Strategic Studies said in its annual survey of world affairs.

Here is the ISS:
http://www.iiss.org/

Here is their famous Iraqi dossier....

http://www.iiss.org/news-more.php?itemID=88

I rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. no nuclear . a bioweapons capability and small chem stockpile - Good Analy
"Today, after four years without inspections, there can be no certainty about the extent of Iraq’s current capacities. A reasonable net assessment is that Iraq has no nuclear weapons but could build one quickly if it acquired sufficient fissile material. It has extensive biological weapons capabilities and a smaller chemical weapons stockpile. It has a small force of ballistic missiles with a range of 650km, that are capable of delivering CBW warheads, and has prepared other delivery methods for CBW, including manned aircraft and UAVs. Sooner or later, it seems likely that the current Iraqi regime will eventually achieve its objectives."

I wish the US had been as clear and honest as these folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. radwriter, your message is interesting but rather cryptic.
You seem to be saying that their WMD analysis was wrong, and therefore we shoudn't believe their Al-Qaida projections. But the IISS Iraq dossier that you link seems to be fairly modest in its claims about WMD. Maybe I'm reading it wrong.

Could you explain a little more fully.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the point is that the IIS is a rather bogus op whose info in the past has
been used to bolster far bigger lies, such as the WMD claims in iraq.

So why would they tell the truth about al queda....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC