Democrats divided over best way to beat Bush

[No2W2004]

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1506&e=3&u=/afp/20040529/ts_alt_afp/us_vote_kerry_bush

(snip)

"Democrats wonder if Kerry should stay on careful path," The New York Times said Thursday, a day after Gore hammered the Bush administration.

Kerry should offer a decidedly different agenda than Bush when it comes to Iraq and the war on terrorism, some Democrats say, warning that Bush's poll numbers could get a boost from improvements in Iraq, a surge in the economy or the capture of Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden (news - web sites).

But other Democrats cautioned against a strategy that relies on Bush's misfortunes to win the presidency.

"I don't think anybody in their right mind is going to run for president on a strategy of 'people hate the other guy and that's enough for our guy to win'," Douglas Sosnik, former president Bill Clinton (news - web sites)'s political strategist, told the Times.

WTF??? How does Sosnik think the Republicans have been winning???

[bucknaked]

1. Not selling many papers, lately? Otherwise, I'm thinking "creative..."

"...journalism."

Who the hell is divided? Certainly, us, here, are NOT!

Analyst... you DO know what the first 4-letters of that title, are, right?

Please!

BTW, "Elite Schools???" Well then...

What...

the...

...Hell! Would you call Yale?!

C/1.5 GPA Stutterboy wafting his way through that school on a legacy admittance.

Oy ve!